• Re: stats 2926-05

    From oldernow@3:633/10 to All on Mon Jun 1 14:57:08 2026
    On 2026-06-01, The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
    Group : rec.arts.sf.written
    Statistics : from 2026-05-01 to 2026-05-31

    ***** Users with most messages *****
    num| Name | Nb Msg |
    ----|----------------------|--------|
    1 | Lynn McGuire | 142 |
    2 | Paul S Person | 101 |
    3 | oldernow | 99 |
    4 | Lawrence D?Oliveiro | 69 |
    5 | Bobbie Sellers | 65 |
    ...

    Kind of fascinating.

    First, oldernow's contributions have far and
    away been pointing out examples of TDS-rooted
    idiocy, which of *course* is not on topic, and
    yet neither was the idiocy being responded to,
    so... there seemed plenty of "what's good for
    the goose" justification to do so.

    After that, oldernow is remembering only "Lynn
    McGuire" and "Lawrence D?Oliveiro" being much
    involved on topic. "Paul S Person" and "Bobbie
    Sellers" seemed mostly interested in perpetuating
    off topic political threads - which, of course,
    would thus be where oldernow would feel the most
    need to followup given the high concentration
    of TDS-rooted idiocy stinking up the place.

    And then there's this:

    ***** Users with most started threads *****
    num| Name | or. |
    ----|----------------------|-----|
    1 | Lynn McGuire | 42 |
    2 | James Nicoll | 15 |
    3 | oldernow | 4 |
    ...

    Really? oldernow somehow ranked *third* in
    starting threads?

    (Okay, oldernow is vaguely remembering starting
    threads that were *arguably* on topic inasmuch
    as the phrase "speculative fiction" hardly
    constitutes a tight, narrow beam of
    specificity.)

    Proof the usenet is not dying

    Maybe.

    Shame on you, those of you who consider yourself
    legitimate rec.arts.sf.written participants! How
    is it that you're posting less than those who
    clearly aren't fans or appreciators of
    "speculative fiction" given their
    overall followup political focus?

    People complain about "trolls", and yet don't
    do their part to make a newsgroup sufficiently,
    legitimately vibrant to discourage some people
    feeling the need to spice a place up a bit for
    lack of on topic fervor.

    What's extra interesting is this author is
    speculating this very moment, and many would
    call it fiction, and thus this post winds up
    hitting the bullseye topically!

    So curious a species....

    --
    v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v
    | alt.troll.adam-h-kerman: proof that the |
    | internet sometimes gets something right | ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.15
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)