?Charted: Annual Space Launches by Superpowers (1957?2025)?
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/sp/hf09-charted-annual-space-launches-b y-country-19572026/
Hat tip to:
https://thelibertydaily.com/
I guess that the USA gets to count SpaceX. Of course, SpaceX is an arm
of the USA DOW. And I like that.
On Tue, 2 Jun 2026 14:52:53 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
?Charted: Annual Space Launches by Superpowers (1957?2025)?
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/sp/hf09-charted-annual-space-launches-by-country-19572026/
Hat tip to:
https://thelibertydaily.com/
I guess that the USA gets to count SpaceX. Of course, SpaceX is an arm
of the USA DOW. And I like that.
So the USA has a DoD but no "DOW", this means that SpaceX is an arm of
... nothing.
On 6/3/2026 10:36 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2026 14:52:53 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
?Charted: Annual Space Launches by Superpowers (1957?2025)?
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/sp/hf09-charted-annual-space-launches-by-country-19572026/
Hat tip to:
https://thelibertydaily.com/
I guess that the USA gets to count SpaceX. Of course, SpaceX is an arm
of the USA DOW. And I like that.
So the USA has a DoD but no "DOW", this means that SpaceX is an arm of
... nothing.
Sigh. Just another old man screaming at the sky, trying to ruin my day.
On 6/3/2026 10:36 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2026 14:52:53 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
?Charted: Annual Space Launches by Superpowers (1957?2025)?
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/sp/hf09-charted-annual-space-
launches-by-country-19572026/
Hat tip to:
˙˙˙ https://thelibertydaily.com/
I guess that the USA gets to count SpaceX.˙ Of course, SpaceX is an arm
of the USA DOW.˙ And I like that.
So the USA has a DoD but no "DOW", this means that SpaceX is an arm of
... nothing.
Sigh.˙ Just another old man screaming at the sky, trying to ruin my day.
Lynn
We have a DOD and NASA is related to that so SpaceX and other providers
are related to that.
Bobbie Sellers <blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com> wrote:
We have a DOD and NASA is related to that so SpaceX and other providers >> are related to that.
NASA is NOT related to that. This is very deliberate. NASA was created because it was found impossible to get a particular job done under a
military organization. NASA is a research organization with some
operational parts.
SpaceX is contracted by some of those operational parts and they use some NASA facilities. SpaceX is also contracted by the Space Force, a DoD organization.
--scott
On 6/3/2026 5:44 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
Bobbie Sellers˙ <blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com> wrote:
˙˙˙˙We have a DOD and NASA is related to that so SpaceX and other
providers
are related to that.
NASA is NOT related to that.˙ This is very deliberate.˙ NASA was created
because it was found impossible to get a particular job done under a
military organization.˙ NASA is a research organization with some
operational parts.
SpaceX is contracted by some of those operational parts and they use some
NASA facilities.˙ SpaceX is also contracted by the Space Force, a DoD
organization.
--scott
There is no DoD organization.˙ There is the DoW organization.
Lynn
On 6/3/26 16:24, Lynn McGuire wrote:
On 6/3/2026 5:44 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:˙˙˙˙So you maintain that their is no Constitution setting forth
Bobbie Sellers˙ <blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com> wrote:
˙˙˙˙We have a DOD and NASA is related to that so SpaceX and other
providers
are related to that.
NASA is NOT related to that.˙ This is very deliberate.˙ NASA was created >>> because it was found impossible to get a particular job done under a
military organization.˙ NASA is a research organization with some
operational parts.
SpaceX is contracted by some of those operational parts and they use
some
NASA facilities.˙ SpaceX is also contracted by the Space Force, a DoD
organization.
--scott
There is no DoD organization.˙ There is the DoW organization.
Lynn
the duties and powers of the respective Branches of the Government?
That document gives the power of creating and designating agencies
to the United States Congress. That Constitution which in my youth
I swore to uphold˙ to the very best of my abilities which are mainly
verbal these days. Otherwise I would give you such a pinch!
Do you maintain that our Federal Government is non-existent or
founded on some other document perhaps the Project 2025
document?
Perhaps there is no Bill of Rights or the rest of the Constitutional Amendments to this time.
Perhaps you feel it is fitting that Mr.Trump be subjected to no more
horrible elections but instead be crowned as the King of the ??? ?
Tell us how you feel with oil over $100/barrel?
˙˙˙˙bliss
That document gives the power of creating and designating agencies
to the United States Congress.
On 6/3/2026 8:58 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
On 6/3/26 16:24, Lynn McGuire wrote:
On 6/3/2026 5:44 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:˙˙˙˙˙So you maintain that their is no Constitution setting forth
Bobbie Sellers˙ <blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com> wrote:
˙˙˙˙We have a DOD and NASA is related to that so SpaceX and other
providers
are related to that.
NASA is NOT related to that.˙ This is very deliberate.˙ NASA was
created
because it was found impossible to get a particular job done under a
military organization.˙ NASA is a research organization with some
operational parts.
SpaceX is contracted by some of those operational parts and they use
some
NASA facilities.˙ SpaceX is also contracted by the Space Force, a DoD
organization.
--scott
There is no DoD organization.˙ There is the DoW organization.
Lynn
the duties and powers of the respective Branches of the Government?
That document gives the power of creating and designating agencies
to the United States Congress. That Constitution which in my youth
I swore to uphold˙ to the very best of my abilities which are mainly
verbal these days. Otherwise I would give you such a pinch!
Do you maintain that our Federal Government is non-existent or
founded on some other document perhaps the Project 2025
document?
Perhaps there is no Bill of Rights or the rest of the Constitutional
Amendments to this time.
Perhaps you feel it is fitting that Mr.Trump be subjected to no more
horrible elections but instead be crowned as the King of the ??? ?
Tell us how you feel with oil over $100/barrel?
˙˙˙˙˙bliss
I like oil at $100 but it has slipped below that.
That document gives the power of creating and designating agencies
to the United States Congress.
Which article?
On 6/3/26 11:49, Lynn McGuire wrote:an arm
On 6/3/2026 10:36 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2026 14:52:53 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
?Charted: Annual Space Launches by Superpowers (1957?2025)?
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/sp/hf09-charted-annual-space-
launches-by-country-19572026/
Hat tip to:
??? https://thelibertydaily.com/
I guess that the USA gets to count SpaceX.? Of course, SpaceX is
ofof the USA DOW.? And I like that.
So the USA has a DoD but no "DOW", this means that SpaceX is an arm
day.... nothing.
Sigh.? Just another old man screaming at the sky, trying to ruin my
Lynn
We have a DOD and NASA is related to that so SpaceX and other providers
are related to that.
Congress after WW II changed the name of the Department of War
to the Department of Defense. They haven't changed the name yet and
they are the body with that authority.
On 6/3/2026 10:32 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
On 6/3/2026 8:58 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
On 6/3/26 16:24, Lynn McGuire wrote:
On 6/3/2026 5:44 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:˙˙˙˙˙So you maintain that their is no Constitution setting forth
Bobbie Sellers˙ <blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com> wrote:
˙˙˙˙We have a DOD and NASA is related to that so SpaceX and other >>>>>> providers
are related to that.
NASA is NOT related to that.˙ This is very deliberate.˙ NASA was
created
because it was found impossible to get a particular job done under a >>>>> military organization.˙ NASA is a research organization with some
operational parts.
SpaceX is contracted by some of those operational parts and they
use some
NASA facilities.˙ SpaceX is also contracted by the Space Force, a DoD >>>>> organization.
--scott
There is no DoD organization.˙ There is the DoW organization.
Lynn
the duties and powers of the respective Branches of the Government?
That document gives the power of creating and designating agencies
to the United States Congress. That Constitution which in my youth
I swore to uphold˙ to the very best of my abilities which are mainly
verbal these days. Otherwise I would give you such a pinch!
Do you maintain that our Federal Government is non-existent or
founded on some other document perhaps the Project 2025
document?
Perhaps there is no Bill of Rights or the rest of the Constitutional
Amendments to this time.
Perhaps you feel it is fitting that Mr.Trump be subjected to no more
horrible elections but instead be crowned as the King of the ??? ?
Tell us how you feel with oil over $100/barrel?
˙˙˙˙˙bliss
I like oil at $100 but it has slipped below that.
That document gives the power of creating and designating agencies
to the United States Congress.
Which article?
Congress?s authority to create federal agencies comes from Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution ? specifically the Necessary and
Proper Clause, which empowers Congress to make laws needed to carry out
its enumerated powers.
Article I establishes the legislative branch and grants Congress
specific powers such as regulating commerce, collecting taxes,
establishing post offices, and providing for the common defense. To
execute these powers effectively, Congress may create administrative agencies to implement and enforce federal law.
The Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) gives Congress the flexibility to establish structures ? including agencies ? needed to carry out its constitutional responsibilities. The Supreme
Court has repeatedly affirmed that this includes creating and shaping
the federal bureaucracy.
pt
On 6/3/2026 9:59 PM, Cryptoengineer wrote:
Congress?s authority to create federal agencies comes from Article I,
Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution ? specifically the Necessary and
Proper Clause, which empowers Congress to make laws needed to carry out
its enumerated powers.
Article I establishes the legislative branch and grants Congress
specific powers such as regulating commerce, collecting taxes,
establishing post offices, and providing for the common defense. To
execute these powers effectively, Congress may create administrative
agencies to implement and enforce federal law.
The Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) gives
Congress the flexibility to establish structures ? including agencies ?
needed to carry out its constitutional responsibilities. The Supreme
Court has repeatedly affirmed that this includes creating and shaping
the federal bureaucracy.
pt
The President is the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces. This is in
the Constitution and supported by SCOTUS. He can call it whatever he wants.
The President is the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces. This is in
the Constitution and supported by SCOTUS. He can call it whatever hewants.
There is no DoD organization. There is the DoW organization.
On Thu, 4 Jun 2026 15:18:13 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
<snippo>
The President is the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces. This is in
the Constitution and supported by SCOTUS. He can call it whatever he wants.
If that were /really/ the case, he would be subject to the UCMJ.
And the military has a lot of experience with removing Commanding
Officers who behave badly. Generally /not/ with extreme prejudice, of
course.
At some point, the legal reality of the title will need to be
determined: a courtesy reflecting his being Chief Executive, or actual
fact.
On 6/5/2026 10:45 AM, Paul S Person wrote:in
On Thu, 4 Jun 2026 15:18:13 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
<snippo>
The President is the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces. This is
wants.the Constitution and supported by SCOTUS. He can call it whatever he
If that were /really/ the case, he would be subject to the UCMJ.
And the military has a lot of experience with removing Commanding
Officers who behave badly. Generally /not/ with extreme prejudice, of
course.
At some point, the legal reality of the title will need to be
determined: a courtesy reflecting his being Chief Executive, or actual
fact.
You are a funny guy. The USA Constitution has a well laid out procedure
for removing the President or the Vice President.
On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 18:07:33 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/5/2026 10:45 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2026 15:18:13 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
<snippo>
The President is the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces. This is in >>>> the Constitution and supported by SCOTUS. He can call it whatever he wants.
If that were /really/ the case, he would be subject to the UCMJ.
And the military has a lot of experience with removing Commanding
Officers who behave badly. Generally /not/ with extreme prejudice, of
course.
At some point, the legal reality of the title will need to be
determined: a courtesy reflecting his being Chief Executive, or actual
fact.
You are a funny guy. The USA Constitution has a well laid out procedure
for removing the President or the Vice President.
The UCMJ doesn't require the approval of Congress.
And the JAG is not limited by the DOiJ theory that they cannot indict
a sitting President.
But none of this is to the point. So I guess you have no point, on
this topic.
As to talking to Trump, I have far better things to waste my time on.
On 6/6/2026 10:30 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 18:07:33 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/5/2026 10:45 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2026 15:18:13 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
<snippo>
The President is the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces.˙ This
is in
the Constitution and supported by SCOTUS.˙ He can call it whatever
he wants.
If that were /really/ the case, he would be subject to the UCMJ.
And the military has a lot of experience with removing Commanding
Officers who behave badly. Generally /not/ with extreme prejudice, of
course.
At some point, the legal reality of the title will need to be
determined: a courtesy reflecting his being Chief Executive, or actual >>>> fact.
You are a funny guy.˙ The USA Constitution has a well laid out procedure >>> for removing the President or the Vice President.
The UCMJ doesn't require the approval of Congress.
And the JAG is not limited by the DOiJ theory that they cannot indict
a sitting President.
But none of this is to the point. So I guess you have no point, on
this topic.
As to talking to Trump, I have far better things to waste my time on.
Your TDS is getting worse.
Lynn
On 6/6/26 11:32, Lynn McGuire wrote:This
On 6/6/2026 10:30 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 18:07:33 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/5/2026 10:45 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2026 15:18:13 -0500, Lynn McGuire
<lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
<snippo>
The President is the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces.?
whateveris in
the Constitution and supported by SCOTUS.? He can call it
ofhe wants.
If that were /really/ the case, he would be subject to the UCMJ.
And the military has a lot of experience with removing Commanding
Officers who behave badly. Generally /not/ with extreme prejudice,
actualcourse.
At some point, the legal reality of the title will need to be
determined: a courtesy reflecting his being Chief Executive, or
procedurefact.
You are a funny guy.? The USA Constitution has a well laid out
On the other hand your Trump Derangement Syndrome seems incurable,for removing the President or the Vice President.
The UCMJ doesn't require the approval of Congress.
And the JAG is not limited by the DOiJ theory that they cannot indict
a sitting President.
But none of this is to the point. So I guess you have no point, on
this topic.
As to talking to Trump, I have far better things to waste my time on.
Your TDS is getting worse.
Lynn
Lynn. You are accepting every word that comes out of
that mouth as gospel truth, as though the lying felon were
indeed a manifestation of Divinity.
So sad to see a mind like yours sunk into the depths
of inanity by TDS.
| Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
|---|---|
| Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
| Users: | 14 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 227:05:10 |
| Calls: | 218 |
| Files: | 21,503 |
| Messages: | 82,858 |