• Re: market change due to

    From paulie420@VERT/BEERS20 to Dart on Tue Sep 2 19:58:00 2025
    hi everybody. What do you think about the current state of the labor market? I have a feeling that if AI continues to develop at its current pace, many people will remain unemployed, including me, who is studying
    to become a programmer. as an employee, I have only one way out so far - to improve my skills, but perhaps over time this will not be enough, and the profession will almost die out.

    I disagree - even with the advancements of AI. There will always be a need for ideas, code and humans with the ability of creating things we all want and need; AI will simply help you to expedite the creation...

    Get on it! Build the next Uber!



    |07p|15AULIE|1142|07o
    |08.........

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2024/05/29 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: 2o fOr beeRS bbs>>>20ForBeers.com:1337
  • From MRO@VERT/BBSESINF to paulie420 on Tue Sep 2 23:38:40 2025
    Re: Re: market change due to
    By: paulie420 to Dart on Tue Sep 02 2025 07:58 pm

    I disagree - even with the advancements of AI. There will always
    be a need for ideas, code and humans with the ability of creating
    things we all want and need; AI will simply help you to expedite
    the creation...


    i just see stupidity, deepfakes and overall bullshit with AI.

    at it's best it's a plagiarist.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Dr. What@VERT/CABANABR to paulie420 on Wed Sep 3 07:25:00 2025
    I disagree - even with the advancements of AI. There will always be a
    need for ideas, code and humans with the ability of creating things we
    all want and need; AI will simply help you to expedite the creation...

    Whenever I hear about how "AI will replace programmers", I respond with "Let me tell you the story about CASE tools back in the 1990's".

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: bbs.CabanaBar.net:11123
  • From Dart@VERT to All on Wed Sep 3 13:31:56 2025
    were there programmers among those who answered me? It seems to me that many of you underestimate the development of AI in recent years.
    perhaps I exaggerated when I said that the profession would disappear completely, but already now you can see that there are no more vacancies, campaigns are reducing staff, and those who remained thanks to the same AI are doing more work. speaking of vacancies, I meant vacancies for junior developers.
    that's why I said that now the only way is to raise your competence to at least the middle developer, since juniors can easily be replaced by one middle with AI. an intelligent person will be able to give precise instructions to AI and quickly check the finished code, quickly finding errors if there are any. at the same time, the neural network writes code almost instantly when compared with a human. therefore, it is advantageous for the campaign to use the middle with a neural network than the middle and junior.
    I'm not trying to scare you, these are just my observations. This is important to me, because no one wants to be unemployed. I don't want to work outside my profession, but I may have to.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Mindsurfer@VERT/FUNTOPIA to Dart on Wed Sep 3 23:18:00 2025
    Re: market change due to
    By: Dart to All on Wed Sep 03 2025 13:31:56

    were there programmers among those who answered me? It seems to me that many of you underestimate the development of AI in recent years. perhaps I exaggerated when I said that the profession would disappear completely, but already now you can see that there are no more vacancies, campaigns are reducing staff, and those who remained thanks to the same AI are doing more work. speaking of vacancies, I meant vacancies for junior developers. that's why I said that now the only way is to raise your competence to at least the middle developer, since juniors can easily be replaced by one middle with AI. an intelligent person will be able to give precise instructions to AI and quickly check the finished code, quickly finding errors if there are any. at the same time, the neural network writes code almost instantly when compared with a human. therefore, it is advantageous for the campaign to use the middle with a neural network than the middle and junior. I'm not trying to scare you, these are just my observations. This is important to me, because no one wants to be unemployed. I don't want to work outside my profession, but I may have to.

    i am running a node for a decentralized mesh network and to manage payments for the services of the node, i need a RPC api endpoint. prefered a freemium RPC endpoint.
    the point is, the RPC endpoint provider i awas using was reducing block range so significantly that i could not query eth_logs for the required block range anymore.
    Long story short, using gemini, i created a python based RPC proxy that is able to paginate block ranges that are longer then allowed by the fremium RPC tier.
    It just does as much RPC endpoint calls as required to get the whole block range.
    so i was able to solve a problem with AI at almost no cost but time. Someone would have to create this code for me for a certain price.
    Since i can solve quite complex problems like those via AI at almost no cost now, i don't have to pay someone for it.
    And you think AI will have no affect on the labor market?
    think again!

    Mindsurfer

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ FuNToPiA BBS - telnet://funtopia.synchro.net:3023 ssh:3022
  • From MRO@VERT/BBSESINF to Mindsurfer on Wed Sep 3 19:31:12 2025
    Re: market change due to
    By: Mindsurfer to Dart on Wed Sep 03 2025 11:18 pm

    anymore. Long story short, using gemini, i created a python based
    RPC proxy that is able to paginate block ranges that are longer then
    allowed by the fremium RPC tier. It just does as much RPC endpoint
    calls as required to get the whole block range. so i was able to
    solve a problem with AI at almost no cost but time. Someone would
    have to create this code for me for a certain price. Since i can
    solve quite complex problems like those via AI at almost no cost now,
    i don't have to pay someone for it. And you think AI will have no
    affect on the labor market? think again!


    so did you have to go over the code and fix it up. are are you sure
    that code wasn't stolen from 1 or more other sources? that's what i've seen personally when i ask ai to shit out some code or a script for me.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Mindsurfer@VERT/FUNTOPIA to MRO on Thu Sep 4 12:36:00 2025
    Re: market change due to
    By: MRO to Mindsurfer on Wed Sep 03 2025 19:31:12

    so did you have to go over the code and fix it up. are are you sure that code wasn't stolen from 1 or more other sources? that's what i've seen personally when i ask ai to shit out some code or a script for me.

    i can't know how the AI comes to what it is coding. It works surely not very different then when i would learn that stuff, but AI has much more memory to choose from and can code super fast. Yes, AI takes from everywhere (thats an issue and not ok) and if monetized, makes money from that information. Everything gets public domain.

    And yes, i do not just take what the Ai is coding. i go through the code and have a general understanding of what is happening.

    i do not sell my RPC proxy or put it on Github etc. I had an issue with small block ranges on fremium accounts and AI was coding a solution for me.

    I had to test the software/code, talk back to the AI and had it make corrections etc. it was not just one go and i had a finished software. It took some testing and fixing. But in the end i had what i wanted and it just works for me now, helping me using fremium RPC providers with a proxy that can paginate the queries.

    Tell me what i would have paid if i would have hired a professional software company. Would a professional software company deliver a better product? probably. Would i care if the script that i got from Gemini does what it's supposed to do? No.

    And i think we are not yet at the end of the AI development. I guess it will only get better/worse (depending how you look at it).

    And certain Jobs just wont be needed anymore or are to expensive if done by a human.


    Mindsurfer

    ps: i did use the free version of googles gemini for this. Just text prompts, no VScode addon or something btw

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ FuNToPiA BBS - telnet://funtopia.synchro.net:3023 ssh:3022
  • From Dr. What@VERT/THEGATEB to Dart on Thu Sep 4 07:09:00 2025
    Dart wrote to All <=-

    were there programmers among those who answered me? It seems to me that many of you underestimate the development of AI in recent years.

    No, I think you overestimate the ability of AI.

    perhaps I exaggerated when I said that the profession would disappear completely, but already now you can see that there are no more
    vacancies, campaigns are reducing staff, and those who remained thanks
    to the same AI are doing more work.

    Only because management has had a few articles about AI read to them that promise a major cost savings. It will take some time to go through the whole 1. Wonderful!
    2. Why isn't this stuff working right?
    3. We don't understand what it does because the AI wrote it.
    4. Our customer dropped us because our AI-written code sucks and we can't fix things quickly.

    speaking of vacancies, I meant vacancies for junior developers.

    Yup. That's what this will hit hardest, sadly.

    that's why I said that now the only
    way is to raise your competence to at least the middle developer,

    But while you are raising your competence, you are a jr. developer - without a job.

    IHMO: Any company that thinks that they will replace developers with AI is going out in a year or so anyway.

    Now, that doesn't mean that AI can't be a productivity tool and make us better developers. But based on what I've seen of the tools today, we are pretty far from that.

    Right now, the best AI can do is be a manual reader/regurgitator for a developer. Maybe, the better AIs can write the boilerplate code for us, but that would be redundant since most of the non-AI tools that we have today can already do that.

    AIs will probably improve to a better code suggestor, but we aren't there yet.


    ... Features should be discovered, not documented!
    --- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    þ Synchronet þ ** The Gate BBS - Shelby, NC - thegateb.synchro.net **
  • From MRO@VERT/BBSESINF to Mindsurfer on Thu Sep 4 12:22:21 2025
    Re: market change due to
    By: Mindsurfer to MRO on Thu Sep 04 2025 12:36 pm


    i can't know how the AI comes to what it is coding. It works surely

    you can always ask it. i dont know if it would tell the truth.

    I had to test the software/code, talk back to the AI and had it make corrections etc. it was not just one go and i had a finished
    software. It took some testing and fixing. But in the end i had what
    i wanted and it just works for me now, helping me using fremium
    RPC providers with a proxy that can paginate the queries.

    i tried that a bunch of times. it would just keep creating bad code or making the wrong corrections. i would point out the problems with the code, telling it how to make corrections and half the time it would ignore me and do something else. i know that it was stealing from sources online and not giving credit. I recognized the code it was taking from.

    Tell me what i would have paid if i would have hired a professional
    software company. Would a professional software company deliver

    they probably wouldnt deal with you. there's always that rent a coder shit
    or just getting help on a forum and paying them a fee.

    And i think we are not yet at the end of the AI development. I guess
    it will only get better/worse (depending how you look at it).

    And certain Jobs just wont be needed anymore or are to expensive
    if done by a human.


    i dont think it will really take jobs away. there's always going to have to be a human handler. I run robots at my job and they do stuff i wouldnt want to do but they still need to be corrected often.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Mindsurfer@VERT/FUNTOPIA to MRO on Thu Sep 4 20:36:00 2025
    Re: market change due to
    By: MRO to Mindsurfer on Thu Sep 04 2025 12:22:21


    i dont think it will really take jobs away. there's always going to have to be a human handler. I run robots at my job and they do stuff i wouldnt want to do but they still need to be corrected often.

    How about jobs in marketing or layout / design?
    when you have a product and need some good looking product shots?
    Is that something where the AI could take jobs?
    Or how about tax advisors?

    The question is if AI is overhyped and it will just get a bit better over time only, or if we are really at the beginning of a world/life changing technology that has just started.

    Mindsurfer

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ FuNToPiA BBS - telnet://funtopia.synchro.net:3023 ssh:3022
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Mindsurfer on Thu Sep 4 12:20:31 2025
    Re: market change due to
    By: Mindsurfer to MRO on Thu Sep 04 2025 08:36 pm

    How about jobs in marketing or layout / design? when you have a product and need some good looking product shots? Is that something where the AI could take jobs?

    I'm not sure. I think part of marketing and layout/design and photos requires a sort of instinct to know what might or might not succeed in a certain place (sometimes I think it's just a guess - I initially didn't see much value in the iPhone, but several years later I got a smartphone and I liked it). Also, for photos, I think there's a sense of what makes a good shot; I think AI could be trained for that, but I feel like there's still times when a human could just do better. But I can see AI improving.

    Or how about tax advisors?

    It seems to me that taxes are one thing where AI could probably succeed in helping people. While complicated, it's possible to follow all the details of tax laws and make recommendations, which I think computers are already good at even without AI. I've been using tax software (such as TurboTax) to help with my taxes for a long time.

    The question is if AI is overhyped and it will just get a bit better over time only, or if we are really at the beginning of a world/life changing technology that has just started.

    I imagine AI will get better, but I'm nervous about where it's heading. I almost feel like a situation like in Terminator or The Matrix could be a real thing. Also, things like Elon Musks's Neuralink make me nervous.. Elon Musk leads the development of Neuralink, and he's also into AI, so I'd be nervous that it may lead to some kind of AI-assisted brain implant of some kind. I feel like if we allow something like that, then it's crossing a line into something that could be dangerous - perhaps we could end up like the Borg from Star Trek.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com