What do you all think of using a dedicated sound card for a PC these days? Is there any benefit anymore?
If you do have a need for better audio on a PC, I've heard people recommend an external audio interface these days (typically USB-based).
Nightfox
I record music some, so I use an external USB Focusrite Scarlett audio interface. It makes a great sound card with easy access to io ports. I agree with you on the Sound Blaster cards. I had a higher end one years ago (can't remember which one now) and I used to love to play midi files through it as it has real instrument sounds.
These days, it seems software-based MIDI synthesizers are typically used (and Windows has one built-in).
What do you all think of using a dedicated sound card for a PC these days? Is there any benefit anymore?
These days, it seems software-based MIDI synthesizers are typically used
(and Windows has one built-in).
Really? I'm using 10 and 11 and I've never come accross a synth.
Re: Dedicated sound cards for a PC
By: Mortar to Nightfox on Mon Jan 05 2026 07:35 pm
These days, it seems software-based MIDI synthesizers are typically used
(and Windows has one built-in).
These days, it seems software-based MIDI synthesizers are typically used
(and Windows has one built-in).
I know this is getting in the weeds some from your original question. But, you can go a step farther with MIDI files and use a software DAW like Cubase and assign virtual instruments VSTs to each track within the MIDI file and end up with a great sounding audio track.
In my earlier reply I
mentioned an older Sound Blaster AWE32/64 card that I had that had these realistic instrument sounds embedded in the chip. Which sounded superior even to the one's on modern mother boards.
What do you all think of using a dedicated sound card for a PC these days? Is there any benefit anymore?
| Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
|---|---|
| Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
| Users: | 15 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 182:25:12 |
| Calls: | 188 |
| Files: | 21,502 |
| Messages: | 82,070 |