• Computer turns on and then just dies

    From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 22 02:19:46 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    I've got a computer I haven't used for some time. I took out a hdd (D:)
    and left it alone. I'm trying to get it to work again, but it just dies
    on me. I've reinstalled the missing hdd and replaced the BIOS battery.

    When I flip the switch of the power supply the standby power led on the motherboard (ASUS F1A75) turns on, stays on for a bit and then dies. If
    I then try again, nothing happens. I have to turn off the power switch
    (power supply), leave it off and then try again. I can get in the BIOS
    shortly (all fans are blowing) and then power's gone again.

    I checked all cables and they should be fine. What could be causing this
    and how to solve?

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Marco Moock@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 22 02:28:56 2024
    Am 21.11.2024 16:19 Uhr schrieb s|b:

    When I flip the switch of the power supply the standby power led on
    the motherboard (ASUS F1A75) turns on, stays on for a bit and then
    dies. If I then try again, nothing happens. I have to turn off the
    power switch (power supply), leave it off and then try again. I can
    get in the BIOS shortly (all fans are blowing) and then power's gone
    again.

    Do you have a spare power supply?

    Can you check the CPU temperatures in the BIOS?


    --=20
    Gru=C3=9F
    Marco

    Spam und Werbung bitte an
    1732202386ichwillgesperrtwerden@nirvana.admins.ws


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: ---:- FTN<->UseNet Gate -:--- (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 22 02:35:10 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:19:46 +0100, s|b wrote:

    I checked all cables and they should be fine. What could be causing this
    and how to solve?

    Forget to mention: I connected a little speaker to the motherboard and
    when I (try to) boot it beeps once, indicating the motherboard should be
    OK. There's a MemOK! switch that shows a red light, but only for a
    moment.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 22 03:07:12 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:28:56 +0100, Marco Moock wrote:

    Do you have a spare power supply?

    I may have one around that I could use, but it's going to take some time
    if I want to try this.

    Can you check the CPU temperatures in the BIOS?

    On the rare occasion I can enter the BIOS it's not long enough to check
    the CPU temperature.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Mr. Man-wai Chang@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 22 03:18:24 2024
    On 22/11/2024 12:07 am, s|b wrote:
    On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:28:56 +0100, Marco Moock wrote:

    Do you have a spare power supply?

    I may have one around that I could use, but it's going to take some time
    if I want to try this.

    Can you check the CPU temperatures in the BIOS?

    On the rare occasion I can enter the BIOS it's not long enough to check
    the CPU temperature.

    CPU too hot, leading to immediate shutdown?

    You forgot to mention the brand and model of the motherboard, and those
    of the power supply!

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 22 03:57:33 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:18:24 +0800, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

    CPU too hot, leading to immediate shutdown?

    When it starts all fans start blowing, CPU fan included. I'm not saying
    it's impossible, but the tower was untouched after I took out the hard
    drive. No loose cables (so it seems).

    You forgot to mention the brand and model of the motherboard, and those
    of the power supply!

    I clearly stated which motherboard it was in the OP:

    ASUS F1A75
    <https://www.asus.com/supportonly/f1a75/helpdesk_manual/>

    Power supply: Antec model EA-380D GREEN 380W

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 22 05:22:45 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    I've got a computer I haven't used for some time. I took out a hdd (D:)
    and left it alone. I'm trying to get it to work again, but it just dies
    on me. I've reinstalled the missing hdd and replaced the BIOS battery.

    When I flip the switch of the power supply the standby power led on the motherboard (ASUS F1A75) turns on, stays on for a bit and then dies. If
    I then try again, nothing happens. I have to turn off the power switch
    (power supply), leave it off and then try again. I can get in the BIOS shortly (all fans are blowing) and then power's gone again.

    I checked all cables and they should be fine. What could be causing this
    and how to solve?

    After replacing the CMOS battery, did you reset the CMOS table (to avoid corruption of its settings, and restore them from EEPROM)?

    When you apply power, do the fans spin, especially the CPU fan? Or do
    they just wiggle a little, and stop? Or not spin at all?

    Used air cans to dust out the inside, like the heatsinks on the CPU and
    GPU? If those are filthy, or not well secured to the CPU and GPU, or
    the thermal paste has dried out, the heat from the chip cannot get
    dissipated from the heatsink (which needs air blowing over it to remove
    the heat fast enough). Thermal protection will shutoff the computer if temperatures of the chips get too high. If you have any cables in the
    way of air flow over the heatsinks, you need to move the cables out of
    the way. Cooling requires drawing inside air, so the inlet of air into
    the case is needed.

    When powering up, also check the PSU fan spins. If not, it also has
    thermal protection.

    If this isn't a really old computer using an AT-style PSU where the
    Power switch was hardwired into the PSU, but is an ATX-style PSU where
    it still supplies some power (3V standby) to the mobo to power the
    onboard logic for powering on, and to where the Power switch goes to the
    mobo, have you tried shorting the PS-On signal on the mobo header to
    where the Power switch connects? For ATX, the Power switch goes to the
    mobo instead of the PSU. It drops the PS-On line to ground which
    signifies to the PSU it should come fully on. On the cable going to the
    mobo from the PSU, the PS-On signal is the green wire. With the PSU
    cable connected to the mobo, you can use a couple sewing needles to
    press into the backside of the cable connector, and cross the needles to
    short the PS-On pin to a Gnd pin.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PS-ON_Signal
    https://www.smps.us/atx-pinout.png
    Pin 16 (green) = PS-On
    There is a ground on both sides of the PS-On pin.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 22 05:43:13 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:19:46 +0100, s|b wrote:

    I checked all cables and they should be fine. What could be causing this
    and how to solve?

    Forget to mention: I connected a little speaker to the motherboard and
    when I (try to) boot it beeps once, indicating the motherboard should be
    OK. There's a MemOK! switch that shows a red light, but only for a
    moment.

    The single beep on cold boot is notifying the video BIOS loaded. Before
    the mobo BIOS can load, the video BIOS has to load (so you can see the
    POST screen, BIOS settings, and the OS loading).

    Without knowing the brand and model of motherboard, not sure what a
    MemOK LED might indicate. In general, a red MemOK LED means there is a
    memory problem. Were you inside the case touching stuff without being
    properly grounded? Because of thermal expansion and contraction when components heat up and cool, components can "walk" out of their
    connectors, or connectors can separate. Unplug and reseat the DIMM
    memory modules, and make sure they are fully seated. Did you change the position (slots) of any DIMM modules? They may only work when paired in
    the correct slots. If all slots are filled, then position is not an
    issue. You might also want to unplug and replug the power connectors
    (to mobo, to video card, to drives, etc) to wipe their contacts of any
    oxides, and ensure they are fully seated. You might even want to remove
    and reseat any daughtercards (those in mobo slots).

    If you are overclocking, DON'T. Reset the BIOS (short the 2-pin mobo
    header) to ensure you are using standard settings. If the MemOK LED is
    also a switch, I believe you can press that switch to load the BIOS
    default settings. However, some mobos come preset for overclocking
    usually so they can sell at a higher price. You might see a spec saying
    "DDR4 3400*/3333*/3200*/3100*/3000*/2933*/2800*/2666*/2600*/2400*/2133"
    for your mobo and what DIMM speeds it supports, but the asterisked ones
    are overclocked settings, so resetting BIOS could have you using the standard/slow speed, and you'd have to test which of the higher settings
    are stable.

    Don't try to boot with the old HDD installed into the computer. Leave
    out the old HDD, and boot with no drive installed. The computer should
    still boot, you get a beep saying the video BIOS loaded okay, the fans
    all spin, but there will be a message on the screen saying something
    like "boot device not found". Getting that far means the system would
    come up if it found an OS on one of the drives configured in BIOS.

    With a red LED next to the MemOK switch, DIMMS that are incompatible or misconfigured (wrong slots) or defective can cause a system boot
    failure. Press and hold the MemOK switch to start automatic memory compatibility tuning which should change BIOS settings to match the
    memory in the DIMM slots. However, if the red LED lights up only
    momentarily, it just might be flashing during the boot (as a test the
    LEDs are working), but the system isn't getting powered off, so the LED
    goes off, too. That flash of the red LED may not indicate a memory
    problem, only that the LED gets flashed as a normal event, but the
    system isn't powering up.

    Got a multimeter or voltmeter to check the voltages on the 20/24-pin
    connector from PSU to mobo?

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 22 07:58:30 2024
    On Thu, 11/21/2024 10:19 AM, s|b wrote:
    I've got a computer I haven't used for some time. I took out a hdd (D:)
    and left it alone. I'm trying to get it to work again, but it just dies
    on me. I've reinstalled the missing hdd and replaced the BIOS battery.

    When I flip the switch of the power supply the standby power led on the motherboard (ASUS F1A75) turns on, stays on for a bit and then dies. If
    I then try again, nothing happens. I have to turn off the power switch
    (power supply), leave it off and then try again. I can get in the BIOS shortly (all fans are blowing) and then power's gone again.

    I checked all cables and they should be fine. What could be causing this
    and how to solve?


    "flip the switch... standby power led on ASUS F1A75... stays on for a bit and then dies"

    The power supply consists of two halves.

    The supervisor power makes +5VSB.
    On an Asus motherboard, the +5VSB LED is tied right to that rail.
    When you see the Asus LED go OFF, it means the +5VSB supply is OFF.

    It has nothing to do with the main SMPS block, which makes 3.3/5/12/-12

    In the situation where you got the BIOS to respond, it means
    the +5VSB circuit was running, and main SMPS was running,
    then the +5VSB fails and the +5VSB "enables" the main SMPS.
    Both of them go off. The +5VSB is the "boss of the machine".

    Your first observation then, is indicative of the problem.

    1) Open PSU casing, check for cobwebs or hair, or some component
    has fallen off its heatsink. Be careful in there, as it's HVDC
    in part of the circuit. 300-500VDC could be on the main cap.

    Also examine for leaking caps (brown stain on top of caps where the
    cap has "K" or "X" seams"). On a failed Antec (ChannelWell CWT)
    here, it was four capacitors on the main supply that were leaking.
    I also had an Antec where the Antec was a spare, and two years
    after I bought it, I went to use it, and it had leaking caps
    just sitting in storage. The Bad Cap Era was not stress related,
    it was bad chemistry (wrong pH) inside the electrolytic cap.

    2) Use a clamp-on ammeter, to monitor the +5VSB wire on the main cable.
    On modern sheathed cabling, we can no longer conveniently do this test!
    The PSU may have a 3 ampere limit. +5VSB at 1 amp might be a typical value
    for a load. Charging your iPhone off USB may draw up to 2 amps, which
    would be very close to the limit for a +5VSB. when the fan stops spinning
    on a PSU which normally spins the fan at all times, and you were charging
    your iPhone, it means the +5VSB runs without cooling. I would recommend
    people NOT charge junk off the PC port -- it might extend the life of the
    +5VSB block.

    Here is a reference circuit. They don't build PSUs this way any more.
    This diagram then, is just to understand the block level concepts.

    http://www.pavouk.org/hw/en_atxps.html

    The +5VSB block is in the lower left corner. This one happens to be a
    linear regulator with fairly low output current capability. Modern
    supplies use an SMPS with MOSFETs for that block, and hopefully,
    with higher efficiency. The SMPS doesn't kick out the heat
    that the item in the diagram does. You can get linear regulators at
    the 3 ampere level, so it is possible to build that circuit as a linear,
    but it could really throw out a lot of heat if charging an iPhone.
    That's why today, it's a tiny SMPS in the lower left corner.

    The top middle of the diagram, has two power transistors switching the primary winding of the shared transformer. The secondary side has rectifier diodes,
    and LC filtering to make low-ripple DC on the output. That was back when the main SMPS was a single circuit. The evolution of the main SMPS into
    two SMPS boards is irrelevant to your debug today.

    At one time, some of the AthlonXP designs (before your AMD was invented),
    they used +5V @ 13A for the CPU supply. This changed to +12V at many more
    amps, from the PSU. The PSU designs of today, have HUGE +12V ratings,
    suited to running CPUs and video cards. One of the consequences of that,
    is the modern PSUs don't expect big +5V loads any more. If selecting
    a supply to run a dual socket AthlonXP board, none of the modern supplies
    would be suitable. There were a few PSUs back in those days, that could
    do +5V @ 40A, whereas the ones today can do +5V @ 20A, and that's not
    enough to run my AthlonXP sample build here.

    Your motherboard is modern enough, that the PSUs are mostly intended
    for it, so you can buy most anything. Beware though, that some of the
    supplies have the connector for the RTX4090 GPU and they don't have
    quite the same selection of PCIe 2x3 and 2x4 supply connectors.

    PSUs can be expensive. I picked up a "mid value" supply at Best Buy
    (as the computer store had a poor selection) and that supply was
    $150.00 CDN. The last two builds used a 750W (in the low power PC)
    and a 650W (in the high power PC). I'm just slapping in whatever
    is sitting on a shelf :-) Since the individual builds happen without coordinating where best to use the supplies, sometimes I end up
    with illogical choices like that. The 650W one has maybe 350W of load
    or so. The +3.3V and the +5V are likely 10 amps or less (out of 20 amps).
    The 3.3V and 5V have a "combined power" - on a Seasonic the combined power
    is 100W. On some other brands the combined power is 130W. My daily driver
    PC has the Seasonic in it SS620GB has combined power of 130W for the
    +3.3V and +5V board, so I must have been checking which Seasonic
    I was buying on that day. This is why you have to sort your Seasonic
    into piles, in terms of rating.

    I try to keep a spare PSU in the house, but it's tough. I don't
    have a spare right now. Everything is in computer cases. And I don't particularly want to go out and buy another $150.00 supply right now.

    Sometimes, there are clearance sales. When Enermax left the country
    (could not get reliable warranty service from Canadian warranty companies), some of their supplies went for a lower price. This offers a chance
    to find supplies at a discount. "Keeping a spare" then, represents
    an open order, to be filled by a supply which is on sale. So really,
    my spare is a measure of "how cheap I am" :-) By buying a spare before
    you need it, you can shop for bargains. So what if it doesn't have
    a warranty.

    Paul

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Mr. Man-wai Chang@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 22 14:42:23 2024
    On 22/11/2024 12:57 am, s|b wrote:

    I clearly stated which motherboard it was in the OP:

    My apology!


    ASUS F1A75
    <https://www.asus.com/supportonly/f1a75/helpdesk_manual/>

    Wow... that's an old AMD motherboard, and it's socket FM1.

    I got an older Asus M3N78 PRO (socket AM2) still kicking though... quite surprising. :)

    Power supply: Antec model EA-380D GREEN 380W

    I had used the same power supply. It did fail after not being powered on
    for months.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Mr. Man-wai Chang@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 22 14:47:38 2024
    On 22/11/2024 12:57 am, s|b wrote:

    I clearly stated which motherboard it was in the OP:

    ASUS F1A75
    <https://www.asus.com/supportonly/f1a75/helpdesk_manual/>

    Speaking of AMD motherboard in that cold era of AMD history, I got a
    dead Asus M5A99X EVO. It worked for years and then suddenly, it could no longer get pass CPU test. That socket AM3 board belonged to the same era
    as your socket FM1 motherboard, and both used DDR3 memory modules.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 22 16:28:07 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

    ...

    2) Use a clamp-on ammeter, to monitor the +5VSB wire on the main cable.

    For typical clamp meters, those rely on alternating current to fluctate
    the magnetic field around the conductor; i.e., the common clamp meter
    just measures AC. The 5V standby line is DC, not AC. With the
    20/24-pin connector from PSU pushed onto the mobo (to account for any
    load), use a voltmeter to measure DC voltage from the +5VSB line (pin 9, purple) to a ground pin (black).

    I can't think of any AC inside the computer excluding the input circuit
    in the PSU. Power into the PSU is AC. All lines out of the PSU are DC.

    DC also induces a magnetic field around the conductor, but not a
    fluctuating magnetic field. An AC clamp meter using a transformer wound through the closing fingers of the clamp won't work on a DC wire. For
    DC, a Hall effect sensor can measure the magnetic field: the magnetic
    field induces a current in the sensor. However, those are inaccurate.
    When measuring hundreds of amperes passing through a conductor, you
    don't care if the actual current is different by several amps. When
    measuring 20A, or especially milliamps, the reading in the meter is so inaccurate that it amounts to using a continuity tester to see there is
    a connection versus how many ohms there are between the 2 points of
    contact. Both AC clamp-on meters and DC Hall effect meters measure by conversion, not direct readings. Magnetic field intensity decreases exponentially by distance, and the huge space inside the fingers of the
    clamp means the reading changes if you reposition the wire from the
    center of the gap to closer to the wire, and it's never accurate,
    anyway.

    You and I may have AC and AC/DC clamp meters, but I suspect the OP does
    not. A good AC clamp meter at Home Depot costs $60 to $120. A good DC
    clamp meter greatly hikes the price to $500, and up.

    I try to keep a spare PSU in the house, but it's tough.

    I tried the same using a modular PSU, so I only need to connect enough
    cables to the PSU as were needed for the particular build. But
    eventually it got used in the next build. A $150+ PSU makes for an
    expensive parts drawer. For an emergency, I'll pay for overnight or
    2-day delivery rather than buy a PSU that may never get used. However,
    I have other computers to use, so I go with free delivery in 5 days.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 22 23:24:18 2024
    On Fri, 11/22/2024 12:28 AM, VanguardLH wrote:
    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

    ...

    2) Use a clamp-on ammeter, to monitor the +5VSB wire on the main cable.

    For typical clamp meters, those rely on alternating current to fluctate
    the magnetic field around the conductor; i.e., the common clamp meter
    just measures AC. The 5V standby line is DC, not AC. With the
    20/24-pin connector from PSU pushed onto the mobo (to account for any
    load), use a voltmeter to measure DC voltage from the +5VSB line (pin 9, purple) to a ground pin (black).

    I can't think of any AC inside the computer excluding the input circuit
    in the PSU. Power into the PSU is AC. All lines out of the PSU are DC.

    DC also induces a magnetic field around the conductor, but not a
    fluctuating magnetic field. An AC clamp meter using a transformer wound through the closing fingers of the clamp won't work on a DC wire. For
    DC, a Hall effect sensor can measure the magnetic field: the magnetic
    field induces a current in the sensor. However, those are inaccurate.
    When measuring hundreds of amperes passing through a conductor, you
    don't care if the actual current is different by several amps. When measuring 20A, or especially milliamps, the reading in the meter is so inaccurate that it amounts to using a continuity tester to see there is
    a connection versus how many ohms there are between the 2 points of
    contact. Both AC clamp-on meters and DC Hall effect meters measure by conversion, not direct readings. Magnetic field intensity decreases exponentially by distance, and the huge space inside the fingers of the
    clamp means the reading changes if you reposition the wire from the
    center of the gap to closer to the wire, and it's never accurate,
    anyway.

    You and I may have AC and AC/DC clamp meters, but I suspect the OP does
    not. A good AC clamp meter at Home Depot costs $60 to $120. A good DC
    clamp meter greatly hikes the price to $500, and up.

    I try to keep a spare PSU in the house, but it's tough.

    I tried the same using a modular PSU, so I only need to connect enough
    cables to the PSU as were needed for the particular build. But
    eventually it got used in the next build. A $150+ PSU makes for an
    expensive parts drawer. For an emergency, I'll pay for overnight or
    2-day delivery rather than buy a PSU that may never get used. However,
    I have other computers to use, so I go with free delivery in 5 days.


    I have an AC/DC clamp meter with Hall Probe technology that
    is every bit as good as your Harbor Freight multimeter, with
    the exception it needs no electrical connection. Slide the
    jaws around and make measurement.

    Mine will measure the automotive starter current, which on a defective
    start can be 150 amps. It will measure 20mA in the last digit, but
    that digit is pretty noisy so the measurement at that level would
    be one looking for activity and not a precise value. That's to give
    some idea what range of measurements I've made with it. The meter measures
    400 amps max, but because it's a Hall probe, nothing gets warm.

    That meter, is the most expensive meter in the house, at around $300
    or so. It does not get used often, but it's a handy thing to have.
    Back when PCs were unsleeved, you could do a complete characterization
    with the clamp-on meter. Check your Intel processor for consumption
    and so on.

    They make slightly more sensitive Hall Probes than that, but then the
    current the sensor draws is 350mA and not a good match for a battery
    operated hand held meter.

    You could make the measurement with a Harbor Freight meter too.
    But it would mean buying a 24 pin extension cable for ATX, cutting
    the +5VSB wire in two, and inserting the meter in-circuit. Which is
    why I don't suggest doing it that way. It interferes with circuit
    operation, and if the wire opens, the PC goes off.

    Paul

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Nov 23 03:20:41 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

    On Fri, 11/22/2024 12:28 AM, VanguardLH wrote:
    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

    ...

    2) Use a clamp-on ammeter, to monitor the +5VSB wire on the main cable.

    For typical clamp meters, those rely on alternating current to fluctate
    the magnetic field around the conductor; i.e., the common clamp meter
    just measures AC. The 5V standby line is DC, not AC. With the
    20/24-pin connector from PSU pushed onto the mobo (to account for any
    load), use a voltmeter to measure DC voltage from the +5VSB line (pin 9,
    purple) to a ground pin (black).

    I can't think of any AC inside the computer excluding the input circuit
    in the PSU. Power into the PSU is AC. All lines out of the PSU are DC.

    DC also induces a magnetic field around the conductor, but not a
    fluctuating magnetic field. An AC clamp meter using a transformer wound
    through the closing fingers of the clamp won't work on a DC wire. For
    DC, a Hall effect sensor can measure the magnetic field: the magnetic
    field induces a current in the sensor. However, those are inaccurate.
    When measuring hundreds of amperes passing through a conductor, you
    don't care if the actual current is different by several amps. When
    measuring 20A, or especially milliamps, the reading in the meter is so
    inaccurate that it amounts to using a continuity tester to see there is
    a connection versus how many ohms there are between the 2 points of
    contact. Both AC clamp-on meters and DC Hall effect meters measure by
    conversion, not direct readings. Magnetic field intensity decreases
    exponentially by distance, and the huge space inside the fingers of the
    clamp means the reading changes if you reposition the wire from the
    center of the gap to closer to the wire, and it's never accurate,
    anyway.

    You and I may have AC and AC/DC clamp meters, but I suspect the OP does
    not. A good AC clamp meter at Home Depot costs $60 to $120. A good DC
    clamp meter greatly hikes the price to $500, and up.

    I try to keep a spare PSU in the house, but it's tough.

    I tried the same using a modular PSU, so I only need to connect enough
    cables to the PSU as were needed for the particular build. But
    eventually it got used in the next build. A $150+ PSU makes for an
    expensive parts drawer. For an emergency, I'll pay for overnight or
    2-day delivery rather than buy a PSU that may never get used. However,
    I have other computers to use, so I go with free delivery in 5 days.


    I have an AC/DC clamp meter with Hall Probe technology that
    is every bit as good as your Harbor Freight multimeter,

    I don't buy much at Harbor Freight. Mostly just focus on Pittsburgh
    brand. For multimeters, never bought one there. Instead of Ames, I'd
    rather spend the money on Klein at Home Depot, and the other brands at
    Harbor aren't work even putting in my car's toolbox.

    Mine will measure

    Brand? Model? Price?

    That meter, is the most expensive meter in the house, at around $300
    or so.

    So, I wasn't far off in guessing $500, or more, for a clamp meter that
    includes a Hall sensor. Guess I'm looking for a couple extra features
    as baseline that up the price.

    You and I like good tools, and collect them like women collect shoes
    (sorry, couldn't help using the sexist analogy). I have oscilloscopes,
    too, but I don't expect typical computer users to have many tools other
    than a few hand tools they acquired for fixing doors and tables.

    You could make the measurement with a Harbor Freight meter too.
    But it would mean buying a 24 pin extension cable for ATX, cutting
    the +5VSB wire in two, and inserting the meter in-circuit. Which is
    why I don't suggest doing it that way. It interferes with circuit
    operation, and if the wire opens, the PC goes off.

    That's why I figured the OP wouldn't be measuring the amp draw on 5VSB.
    Really all he needs to check is there is 5VDC on the 5VSB line. Even
    the lowest grade PSUs should be able to provide enough amps for that.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Nov 23 05:47:54 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 11:42:23 +0800, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

    Wow... that's an old AMD motherboard, and it's socket FM1.

    I got an older Asus M3N78 PRO (socket AM2) still kicking though... quite surprising. :)

    I've got an even older PC that I used to play around with Linux Mint,
    Tails, Kali Linux, Puppy Linux, ...

    Power supply: Antec model EA-380D GREEN 380W

    I had used the same power supply. It did fail after not being powered on
    for months.

    The power supply that I have available is even older, but I know it
    works. Question is if I can use. Connectors seem the same.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Nov 23 05:48:28 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 11:47:38 +0800, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

    Speaking of AMD motherboard in that cold era of AMD history, I got a
    dead Asus M5A99X EVO. It worked for years and then suddenly, it could no longer get pass CPU test. That socket AM3 board belonged to the same era
    as your socket FM1 motherboard, and both used DDR3 memory modules.

    Maybe it's (real) bugs? ;-)

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Nov 23 05:56:17 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 12:43:13 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    The single beep on cold boot is notifying the video BIOS loaded. Before
    the mobo BIOS can load, the video BIOS has to load (so you can see the
    POST screen, BIOS settings, and the OS loading).

    Sometimes I can get in the BIOS, but after seconds the power is shut
    off.

    Without knowing the brand and model of motherboard, not sure what a
    MemOK LED might indicate.

    I mentioned that in the OP and I've searched the manual: red for a few
    seconds and then off is a good thing.

    Were you inside the case touching stuff without being
    properly grounded?

    You mean like the thingy on my wrist? No.

    Unplug and reseat the DIMM
    memory modules, and make sure they are fully seated. Did you change the position (slots) of any DIMM modules?

    Tried that, several combinations. It's 2 modules; the mobo supports
    paired.

    If you are overclocking, DON'T.

    I don't.

    Reset the BIOS (short the 2-pin mobo
    header) to ensure you are using standard settings.

    Tried that.

    Don't try to boot with the old HDD installed into the computer. Leave
    out the old HDD, and boot with no drive installed. The computer should
    still boot, you get a beep saying the video BIOS loaded okay, the fans
    all spin, but there will be a message on the screen saying something
    like "boot device not found". Getting that far means the system would
    come up if it found an OS on one of the drives configured in BIOS.

    This, I haven't tried.

    Got a multimeter or voltmeter to check the voltages on the 20/24-pin connector from PSU to mobo?

    That's above my skill. I know how to build a PC and what each part does
    (more or less), but that's about it.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Nov 23 06:01:39 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 12:22:45 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    After replacing the CMOS battery, did you reset the CMOS table (to avoid corruption of its settings, and restore them from EEPROM)?

    I did the reset, but don't remember if that was before or after I
    replaced the battery. Will do it again.

    When you apply power, do the fans spin, especially the CPU fan? Or do
    they just wiggle a little, and stop? Or not spin at all?

    CPU fan, case fan, power supply fan, graphic card fan, they all spin at
    high speed, but only for a few seconds.

    Used air cans to dust out the inside, like the heatsinks on the CPU and
    GPU? If those are filthy, or not well secured to the CPU and GPU, or
    the thermal paste has dried out, the heat from the chip cannot get
    dissipated from the heatsink

    I'm beginning to think this could be it. Wouldn't there be warning beeps though?

    When powering up, also check the PSU fan spins. If not, it also has
    thermal protection.

    Last time I checked it spinned, but I will take extra notice next time.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Nov 23 10:32:06 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 12:43:13 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    Were you inside the case touching stuff without being
    properly grounded?

    You mean like the thingy on my wrist? No.

    Actually you just need to ground yourself with a wired wrist
    contraption. With the computer plugged into a 3-prong outlet, the
    chassis is grounded. Use one hand to grab the chassis (ground) while
    you use the other hand to putz around inside. If you need 2 hands
    inside, just ground yourself first, and don't anything while inside,
    like walk around on carpet, shuffle papers, or do anything that will
    build a static charge on you. You're trying to reduce or eliminate the
    voltaic potential between you and the electronics, not necessary have
    you grounded but the device floating at some higher voltage.

    High voltage doesn't kill. A difference in voltage kills.
    Speed doesn't kill. A difference in speed kills.

    Got a multimeter or voltmeter to check the voltages on the 20/24-pin
    connector from PSU to mobo?

    That's above my skill. I know how to build a PC and what each part does
    (more or less), but that's about it.

    Multimeters are cheap. You don't need a super accurate one that has
    been verified at a lab. You're just checking if voltages from the PSU
    (while under load) are okay at the 20/24-pin connector from PSU to mobo.

    What brand PSU do you have? Some are pretty bad. Is it a prebuilt
    computer? Those get minimal PSUs often incapable of supporting the
    additional load of populating the other daughtercard slots on the mobo.
    Figure a 10% loss in wattage each year for the cheapies, or 5% per year
    for the good ones. They wane over time. The cheapies also overrate
    their capacity by claiming, say, 750W but not for a sustained load.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Nov 23 11:03:37 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 12:22:45 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    After replacing the CMOS battery, did you reset the CMOS table (to avoid
    corruption of its settings, and restore them from EEPROM)?

    I did the reset, but don't remember if that was before or after I
    replaced the battery. Will do it again.

    When you apply power, do the fans spin, especially the CPU fan? Or do
    they just wiggle a little, and stop? Or not spin at all?

    CPU fan, case fan, power supply fan, graphic card fan, they all spin at
    high speed, but only for a few seconds.

    Used air cans to dust out the inside, like the heatsinks on the CPU and
    GPU? If those are filthy, or not well secured to the CPU and GPU, or
    the thermal paste has dried out, the heat from the chip cannot get
    dissipated from the heatsink

    I'm beginning to think this could be it. Wouldn't there be warning beeps though?

    Thermal protection does a power shutdown. While they measure
    temperature, reaching that temperature means it is on the rise, and
    there is more heat building up. The component will get even hotter,
    especially when fans are turned off (so it be smarter to keep the fans
    running for a minute after the thermal shutdown, like how some electric
    fans on car radiators keep spinning after turning off the car). They
    have to shut down at temperature that permits sufficient time to prevent further buildup of heat causing damage.

    In some setups, the CPU gets throttled (runs slower) to reduce its heat
    output. That makes the computer really slow, but it still starts.
    However, if the temperature is too high, the thermal cutoff is immediate
    to prevent burning up stuff.

    Often you can use your nose as a detective. Sniff around inside, like
    the exhaust side of the PSU (that pushes air into the case), the voltage regulator capacitors around the CPU. Although you could get an infrared temperature probe, just putting a finger on heatsinks and memory modules
    might hint stuff is getting too hot. Same for touching the drives.
    Just remember that what is too hot for your finger isn't that hot for electronics. The CPU is probably rated for an *operating* temperature
    up to 80C (176F), but your finger won't enjoy that temperature. Third
    degree burns happen at 66C (150F).

    You won't know if new thermal paste is needed until you separate the
    heatsinks from the chip, but then you'll need to repaste, anyway. Don't
    reuse thermal paste. After separating the two, clean off the old paste,
    even if it looks good, and apply new paste. Most users apply thermal
    paste way too thick. Metal-to-metal is best for thermal transfer. Air
    is very bad. The paste is used only to fill the microscopic gaps
    between chip plate and heatsink. Unfortunately not all chip plates and heatsinks are perfectly flat, so the paste also accomodates larger gaps,
    but thermal paste is not as good as metal-to-metal. More paste is not
    better. Rare few users lap the plate atop the CPU and the bottom of the heatsink to get them as flat as possible to ensure maximum
    metal-to-metal contact.

    Some setups don't use paste, but thermal strips as those are more neat
    to apply (less mess), don't require expertise in applying a *thin* layer
    of paste, and don't ooze out under the pressure of clamping the heatsink
    to the CPU. Those liquidfy under pressure and heat: they get applied to
    the heatsink which is pressed down onto the CPU which heats up, and the
    tape liquidfies. Thermal strips are not as effective as thermal paste,
    but thermal paste gobbed on too thick is almost as bad as not using any.
    If you do end up scraping off the old paste and applying new paste, be
    careful of those containing metallic particles. The premise is the
    metal particles provide better thermal transfer, but any that oozes out
    when the heatsink is clamped onto the CPU can short out foil paths and component connections on the mobo around the CPU.

    When powering up, also check the PSU fan spins. If not, it also has
    thermal protection.

    Last time I checked it spinned, but I will take extra notice next time.

    Most PSUs have only 1 fan: exhaust (into the interior of the case).
    Some have 2 fans: intake (outside air into PSU) and exhaust (inside of
    PSU into the case). Mostly those are for redundancy: if one fan fails,
    the other is sufficient.

    There are some PSUs that don't push any air inside the case. Usually
    those are bottom-mounted in the case. They suck up air from the bottom
    and push out to the side. The outside air goes through the PSU, and
    only through the PSU to cool just the PSU. The idea is not to push
    preheated air from heated components inside the PSU into the case.
    Instead separate case fans are used to get cooler outside air inside the
    case.

    Although you may see the fans spin doesn't mean their spindles will spin
    freely (minimum friction). If a fan, especially the CPU heatsink fan,
    doesn't spin fast enough, the BIOS can power down the computer. Without
    the fan spinning, there is no air passing over the heat sink to cool it.
    Often the BIOS settings will show the fan speeds, but you might not be
    able to navigate to that screen since the computer is powering off
    pretty quick. Take an ear swab, wood stirrer stick, or something thin
    and non-conductive to flick the blades on the fan to spin it. The fan
    should not immediate stop when the stirrer stick stops pushing the
    blade. If accessible, you can also put your finger on the hub to spin
    the blades attached to it. If you feel resistance, or almost a
    throbbing sensation (there is intermittent resistance), or the hub with
    blades won't keep spinning a turn or two after you flick the hub, the
    fan is worn out. That could result in the fan not spinning fast enough,
    the BIOS sees a slow fan, and shuts down to prevent thermal damage from
    lack of air cooling.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Nov 23 12:34:22 2024
    On Fri, 11/22/2024 1:47 PM, s|b wrote:
    On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 11:42:23 +0800, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

    Wow... that's an old AMD motherboard, and it's socket FM1.

    I got an older Asus M3N78 PRO (socket AM2) still kicking though... quite
    surprising. :)

    I've got an even older PC that I used to play around with Linux Mint,
    Tails, Kali Linux, Puppy Linux, ...

    Power supply: Antec model EA-380D GREEN 380W

    I had used the same power supply. It did fail after not being powered on
    for months.

    The power supply that I have available is even older, but I know it
    works. Question is if I can use. Connectors seem the same.


    October 2, 2010 7:00 PM EST

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/3902/antec-earthwatts-ea-380d-green-380w/7

    "There's still enough power on top to run a Core i7 or Phenom X6 processor
    and a discrete GPU, but you'll want to stick with graphics cards that only
    require a single PCIe power connection to err on the side of caution."

    That means in their estimation, a 125W video card (50W slot, 75W on 2x3)

    5V 3.3V 12V1 12V2 -12V +5VSB [ PCIe 1 x 6-pin ]

    20A 20A 17A 15A 0.5A 2.5A
    \ / \ /
    115W 28A common
    combined source

    12V2 is CPU
    12V1 is peripherals, PCIe slots

    The two wiring looms should have their own overcurrent detection.
    And apparently draw from a common source (the 28A number).

    *******

    "ASUS F1A75" we don't know what processor.

    A guess would be, it can't be over about 100W or 12V @ 10A to allow some efficiency room. The 380D should be fine with the 15A it offers.

    https://www.asus.com/me-en/supportonly/f1a75-v%20pro/helpdesk_cpu/

    AMD A8-3870K (AD3870WNZ43GX, rev.B0, 3.0GHz, QC, L2:4M, HD6550D, 100W)

    10A from 28A combined spec, leaves 18A for peripherals, and the peripheral
    rail has a 17A limit. 10A for the biggest video card it supports by
    using the PCIe 2x3 connector leaves 12V @ 7A margin.

    Best guess, when the supply was healthy and new, yes, it would be
    sufficient for that board. Barring any surprises like
    "I'm running a Bitcoin farm off it too" :-)

    Paul




    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Mr. Man-wai Chang@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Nov 23 15:12:16 2024
    On 23/11/2024 2:48 am, s|b wrote:
    On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 11:47:38 +0800, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

    Speaking of AMD motherboard in that cold era of AMD history, I got a
    dead Asus M5A99X EVO. It worked for years and then suddenly, it could no
    longer get pass CPU test. That socket AM3 board belonged to the same era
    as your socket FM1 motherboard, and both used DDR3 memory modules.

    Maybe it's (real) bugs? ;-)


    It was really strange. First the Asus M5A99X EVO randomly failed to
    boot, then it just stopped at the CPU test LED. I always thought this
    could be fixed by Asus, but I did not ask for services and just bought/upgraded to a better motherboard.

    OTOH, I still got a Asrock E350M1 kicking. It also belonged to that cold
    era of AMD history.



    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Nov 23 22:09:57 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 15:58:30 -0500, Paul wrote:

    "flip the switch... standby power led on ASUS F1A75... stays on for a bit and then dies"

    The power supply consists of two halves.

    It's a bit too technical for me, but I appreciate the response. I'd
    expect the PSU to either work or not. Is the behaviour that I'm
    experiencing possible with a broken PSU?

    I'm going to replace the thermal paste of the CPU first and see what
    happens.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Nov 23 23:07:35 2024
    On Sat, 11/23/2024 6:09 AM, s|b wrote:
    On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 15:58:30 -0500, Paul wrote:

    "flip the switch... standby power led on ASUS F1A75... stays on for a bit and then dies"

    The power supply consists of two halves.

    It's a bit too technical for me, but I appreciate the response. I'd
    expect the PSU to either work or not. Is the behaviour that I'm
    experiencing possible with a broken PSU?

    I'm going to replace the thermal paste of the CPU first and see what
    happens.


    Just change the PSU and retest :-)
    I've done that a few times, as a first step.

    *******

    Never hurts to change thermal paste. Especially the hobby non-permanent kind.

    Some of the paste materials are good enough to be permanently used.
    The screened thick materials provided initially on heatsinks
    can be quite good.

    Hobby pastes vary in endurance. One (which I won't promote by
    naming it), reacts with the metal in the CPU and the metal in the
    heatsink. That's an example of a bad choice, as some people have
    experienced (no warranty support when that damage is detected!).

    Some of the others, are well designed pastes, with the right
    kind of viscosity, but if you "abuse" the PC, by dropping or
    kicking it, that affects the paste integrity (air ingress), and
    re-pasting those is a good idea. Like, just handling the heavy
    heatsink assembly, applying too much "torque" to it while working
    on a PC, can affect it by a few degrees of performance. It's because
    the huge heatsinks weigh so much, that this kind of thing happens.
    A light heatsink has sufficient normal force to remain in contact.

    Paul


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Nov 24 07:28:54 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 15:58:30 -0500, Paul wrote:

    "flip the switch... standby power led on ASUS F1A75... stays on for a bit and then dies"

    The power supply consists of two halves.

    It's a bit too technical for me, but I appreciate the response. I'd
    expect the PSU to either work or not. Is the behaviour that I'm
    experiencing possible with a broken PSU?

    I'm going to replace the thermal paste of the CPU first and see what
    happens.

    Make sure to use non-metallic paste. Use ceramic. Since you're not overclocking, you won't achieve a one to three degree decrease in
    temperature, anyway. Not overclocking already reduced heat generation.
    Also, make sure it is thermal PASTE, not thermal adhesive which is an
    epoxy. You might even go with a thermal strip aka thermal pad for less
    mess. Although not as efficient as paste, strips will work well enough, especially in non-overclocking scenarios. Way too many users gob on too
    much paste resulting is less than an ideal mating between CPU plate and heatsink. More is NOT better.

    You'll need a piece of mylar or other thin plastic to apply the paste.
    A credit card is too rough on its edges. You want a shear coat, not an
    opaque coat. After pressing the heatsink to the CPU plate, and before
    clamping down the heatsink, rotate the heatsink to ensure the paste gets distributed across the CPU plate. You can watch Youtube videos to get techniques and suggestions. However, even this guy put on way too much: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7x2sUt0mqo. Yet his moniker claims he
    is from Arctic which is the pervasive leader in after-market pastes.
    About a quarter of what he applied is needed. Of course, when using the plastic plate to watch the spread, probably about half of the paste
    ended up on the plastic plate after removal. Here's another guy gobbing
    on way too much thermal paste: https://youtu.be/a0LlMDk_ljQ?t=12.

    I've seen many techniques suggested for applying the correct amount of
    thermal paste. One is to use a piece of thin mylar to spread around the
    paste to coat a thin layer you can see through. Another is to put one
    drop in the middle of the CPU plate, or 5 tiny drops in the center and
    at midway to the corners, to push down the heatsink to rotate and spread
    the paste. If any oozes out paste the CPU plate, you put on too much
    which also means there is likely too much between CPU and heatsink.

    You'll need isopropyl alcohol and a plastic scraper to remove the old
    paste. Make sure the CPU plate and heatsink are devoid of any old paste
    or thermal pad, and are clean. After cleaning, keep your fingers off.

    Considering your lack of electronic test equipment, I suspect paste
    might not be the way for you to go. A thermal pad gets squeezed between
    CPU plate and heatsink, won't ooze out, and liquifies (melts) under
    pressure and heat. Considering how many users apply way too much paste,
    and if not overclocking, a pad is just as good. I've never gotten into
    pads, but https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BhKx0iQ4K8 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niAQs8dZohE look interesting. Despite
    the claim reusability of the graphic pad, I'd never reuse one. I'd
    replace it just I would replace paste. I'm not building and rebuilding hundreds of boxes.

    Personally I'd go with the PSU substitution suggestion first. The load
    a PSU can handle with proper regulation varies with age, and crappy PSUs
    age faster. Replacing thermal paste isn't a job for a newbie. I always
    lap the CPU plate and heatsink to get them as flat as possible for best
    mating since metal-to-metal contact is by far the best method for
    thermal transfer. However, rare few users lap their CPU and heatsink.
    I don't overclock, but do want thermal transfer to work best, and want
    the least amount of paste since it also ages.

    Although the focus has been on the paste, another facet of concern is if
    the clamping of the heatsink is even. You don't want to cinch down one
    side more than the other. That will squeeze out more paste on one side,
    but leave too much on the side with less pressure. You want paste to substitute for air, not thermal paste to be the primary transfer media.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Nov 24 08:18:53 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:18:24 +0800, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

    CPU too hot, leading to immediate shutdown?

    When it starts all fans start blowing, CPU fan included. I'm not saying
    it's impossible, but the tower was untouched after I took out the hard
    drive. No loose cables (so it seems).

    You forgot to mention the brand and model of the motherboard, and those
    of the power supply!

    I clearly stated which motherboard it was in the OP:

    ASUS F1A75
    <https://www.asus.com/supportonly/f1a75/helpdesk_manual/>

    Power supply: Antec model EA-380D GREEN 380W

    I didn't see mention the power consumption of that motherboard, but then
    other components would add to that, like video card, drives, memory
    modules, etc. Rather than try to use some online power calculator
    trying to estimate what size PSU is needed for a particular setup, I
    measure the input power to the computer.

    You could use a clamp A/C meter to measure how much current was flowing
    into the computer on its power cord, but you need to use a splitter
    adapter or shunt that separates the lines (hot and neutral) to let you effectively put the clamp around just one wire. Instead a kill-a-watt
    meter is much easier. You plug it into the outlet, and plug the power
    cord into the meter. That will tell you how much power is getting drawn
    into the computer for all components inside, and everything attached
    drawing power from the computer.

    https://www.amazon.com/P3-P4400-Electricity-Usage-Monitor/dp/B00009MDBU?th=1

    There are different models, and different brands. All you might need is
    a cheap model as you only want to see what the computer draws at the
    time you are using it, not record high and low points or a history of
    power consumption.

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/3902/antec-earthwatts-ea-380d-green-380w
    (use the drop-down list to read other sections of the article)

    That measures the power going in. PSUs are not 100% efficient. Your
    Antec PSU has an efficiency of 85%, at best, but that's when it was new
    at a particular load. So, whatever the kill-a-watt meter shows you
    multiply by .85 for what the PSU could deliver out. The less efficient
    the PSU, the heat it generates. I didn't bother to check if the 380W
    rating was for momentary or sustained load. Mostly when I saw 380W it
    seemed too low, but then maybe your setup doesn't need much power. At a minimum, I'd go by the kill-a-watt meter for what you're using now, and
    ignore the efficiency rating.

    If I knew the mobo's max load, CPU, drives, memory, video card, and
    everything else inside, and anything connected to the computer, like USB devices that don't supply their own power, then I could figure out what
    size PSU is needed. Without all that, and to measure the actual load
    versus what the specs say, I'd use a kill-a-watt meter.

    If you replace the PSU, get a bigger one. Perhaps a much bigger one,
    and more efficient to run cooler. Besides, you'll save very little
    getting another 350W PSU versus a 750W PSU. You might actually pay more
    for a 350W PSU, because the manufacturers are focusing and are tooled to produce higher wattage units.

    I've bought Fortron PSUs who became FSP which sells to makers under the
    brands Antec, Sparkle, OCZ, SilverStone, Thermaltake, Nexus, Zalman, and
    maybe more.

    350W at Newegg: https://www.newegg.com/p/pl?d=power+supply&N=600014047%20100007657
    Higher wattages: https://www.newegg.com/p/pl?N=100007657%20600479296&d=power+supply

    Might as well buy a bigger one than the same cost on a small one.


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Nov 25 02:51:38 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:19:46 +0100, s|b wrote:

    When I flip the switch of the power supply the standby power led on the motherboard (ASUS F1A75) turns on, stays on for a bit and then dies.

    These should be all components:


    CPU: AMD-A8-3870 BLACK EDITION WITH RADEON HD 6550D

    Tower/PSU: ANTEC-NSK4482B-EC 380 WATT

    Graphic card: AMD-AP38G160U2K

    SSD: INTEL-SSDSC2CW120A310 120GB 520 SERIES 34NM SATA III2 .

    HDD: WESTERN DIGITAL-WD5000AAKX 500GB 16MB SATA600 7200RPM

    CD/DVD (re)writer: LITE-ON-IHAS122-18 SATA 22X DVD-RW

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Nov 25 03:10:28 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 14:28:54 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    I'm going to replace the thermal paste of the CPU first and see what happens.

    Make sure to use non-metallic paste. Use ceramic. Since you're not overclocking, you won't achieve a one to three degree decrease in temperature, anyway. Not overclocking already reduced heat generation.
    Also, make sure it is thermal PASTE, not thermal adhesive which is an
    epoxy.

    I already ordered Arctic MX-4. What can I say? I'm an impulsive buyer.
    (-:

    You'll need a piece of mylar or other thin plastic to apply the paste.
    A credit card is too rough on its edges. You want a shear coat, not an opaque coat.

    I'm hardly an expert, I just saw a YT trying one dot, 5 dot, cross and
    then some tool to spread the paste, like what you're saying. Some guy
    commented that one dot is the best and that using a tool causes air
    bubbles. (?)

    I've seen many techniques suggested for applying the correct amount of thermal paste. One is to use a piece of thin mylar to spread around the paste to coat a thin layer you can see through. Another is to put one
    drop in the middle of the CPU plate, or 5 tiny drops in the center and
    at midway to the corners, to push down the heatsink to rotate and spread
    the paste. If any oozes out paste the CPU plate, you put on too much
    which also means there is likely too much between CPU and heatsink.

    I think I'm going to go with the one dot method while keeping in mind:
    less is more. I'll practice on a napkin first.

    You'll need isopropyl alcohol and a plastic scraper to remove the old
    paste. Make sure the CPU plate and heatsink are devoid of any old paste
    or thermal pad, and are clean. After cleaning, keep your fingers off.

    Done.

    Considering your lack of electronic test equipment, I suspect paste
    might not be the way for you to go. A thermal pad gets squeezed between
    CPU plate and heatsink, won't ooze out, and liquifies (melts) under
    pressure and heat. Considering how many users apply way too much paste,
    and if not overclocking, a pad is just as good. I've never gotten into
    pads, but https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BhKx0iQ4K8 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niAQs8dZohE look interesting. Despite
    the claim reusability of the graphic pad, I'd never reuse one. I'd
    replace it just I would replace paste. I'm not building and rebuilding hundreds of boxes.

    One of the few computers I assembled myself had AMD CPU's with a
    heatsink that had such a thermal pad. I'm just going to with the paste.
    It's not like it's a brand new computer.

    Personally I'd go with the PSU substitution suggestion first.

    So you're conspiring with Paul eh? ;-) I already removed the paste, so
    I'll have to replace that first. If that doesn't work I'll come back to
    ask if the even older PSU that I've got is compatible.

    The load
    a PSU can handle with proper regulation varies with age, and crappy PSUs
    age faster. Replacing thermal paste isn't a job for a newbie. I always
    lap the CPU plate and heatsink to get them as flat as possible for best mating since metal-to-metal contact is by far the best method for
    thermal transfer. However, rare few users lap their CPU and heatsink.
    I don't overclock, but do want thermal transfer to work best, and want
    the least amount of paste since it also ages.

    I understand your concern, but it's not a new computer. For me it's more
    for the fun of it. If I fail, then I fail, but I will still have learned something and that's worth something (for me anyway).

    Although the focus has been on the paste, another facet of concern is if
    the clamping of the heatsink is even. You don't want to cinch down one
    side more than the other. That will squeeze out more paste on one side,
    but leave too much on the side with less pressure. You want paste to substitute for air, not thermal paste to be the primary transfer media.

    Thanks for the advice. I've been practicing on the clamping of the
    heatsink.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Nov 25 03:12:27 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 07:07:35 -0500, Paul wrote:

    Just change the PSU and retest :-)
    I've done that a few times, as a first step.

    Yes, I just read VanguardLH's advice, but it's too late; i already
    removed the paste from the CPU and heatsink.

    Never hurts to change thermal paste. Especially the hobby non-permanent kind.

    Is Arctic MX-4 any good?

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Nov 25 07:21:47 2024
    On Sun, 11/24/2024 11:12 AM, s|b wrote:
    On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 07:07:35 -0500, Paul wrote:

    Just change the PSU and retest :-)
    I've done that a few times, as a first step.

    Yes, I just read VanguardLH's advice, but it's too late; i already
    removed the paste from the CPU and heatsink.

    Never hurts to change thermal paste. Especially the hobby non-permanent kind.

    Is Arctic MX-4 any good?


    You can see they have a lot of similarities. In terms of slump
    and texture. A lot of these look like the AS-5 I use right now.

    https://www.tweaktown.com/image.php?image=https://static.tweaktown.com/content/3/3/3383_04_full.jpg

    No, you don't generally spread them with a credit card any more.
    Some of the products are "crumbly" and the reputation is they
    are hard to apply, which is probably quite true. The others
    are more gel-like, and when crushed by the load of the heatsink,
    they spread quite nicely.

    You can tell this, by doing a calibration fitting. Say the instructions
    tell you to install "five dots".

    x x

    X

    x x

    You can apply your heatsink for a test, press down, then remove
    the heatsink and look at how well it spread out. This also functions
    as your "tinting cycle", as you'll be wiping that off and cleaning
    most all of it off, and the grooves in the metal will have some
    of the new paste in them. I don't leave a lot of material during
    the cleaning, in order to not apply too much later.

    Then, when you do the real installation, you will know whether the
    dots should have been bigger or not

    X X

    ***

    X X

    You don't want too much shooting out of the gap,
    as then it's a mess to clean up later if it gets
    into the wrong places on the motherboard.

    I have a tube of AS-5 here, and it's suitable for
    applying dots (according to what the manufacturer
    recommends for each processor type), then just seat
    the heatsink in it and tighten it up. Some processors
    only use a central dot. Some processors are convex,
    some processors are flat on top, which is why the
    dot pattern recommendation varies.

    I like screw fittings and permanently attached back plates.
    Some of the solutions that "come in the box" with motherboards,
    they fall off when unscrewed, then you have to remove the
    motherboard from the computer, apply paste, assemble,
    and insert the reassembled mobo+HS into the case. This is
    a major pain. And something they don't tell you, is you
    can SCRAPE SMALL CAPS off the board when reinserting the
    board into the computer case.

    It is for this reason, that I recommend third party HS
    assemblies which allow removal and re-seating of the
    heatsink, without having to pull the motherboard out
    of the case. As long as the manufacturers use 1x2 cellphone
    capacitors on the motherboard surface, you have to be a lot
    more careful to not damage the surface mount components.
    Your motherboard is an older generation and might have
    0603 or 0402 caps and the older components are a bit
    bigger and harder to damage without a bit more effort.

    *******

    The MX-4 has the ability to spread easily. The temperature
    different generally is only a couple degrees C between
    competitors. But when a compound spreads (these are not
    phase change compounds like the screened ones that come
    with the heatsink are), you may have to redo it five years
    from now. The temperature rise will tell you it is time to change it.

    https://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/3383/arctic_cooling_mx_4_thermal_compound/index.html

    The problem with getting, say, a new heatsink for a build,
    is you ruin the screened material while having trouble
    fitting the screws. I've had trouble tightening the screws
    on any of the last four (third-party) heatsinks, and none of
    them had the screw threads "catch" on the first try. I was
    a lather of sweat, lots of cursing, before the damn screws
    were finally fitted. And that might have been the third time
    I applied paste. This is why, if a screened material is placed
    on the brand new heatsink, you hardly get to keep that compound
    and have to use your tube of MX-4 instead. Fitting these things
    is a nuisance.

    Paul

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Nov 25 07:27:43 2024
    On Sun, 11/24/2024 11:10 AM, s|b wrote:


    I think I'm going to go with the one dot method while keeping in mind:
    less is more. I'll practice on a napkin first.

    No, you do a test fitting, applying your proposed dot pattern, and
    checking the spread of the compound when the heatsink is pressed into it.

    The size of the "contact circle" as the paste spreads, tells you

    1) Whether the dot was the right size.
    2) Whether it should have been a five dot pattern.

    You do not need to do a second calibration cycle, as you now know
    how big the total quantity of compound needs to be, to fill
    out to the edges.

    Since you are changing paste types, you need to recalibrate
    the quantity so you do a good job. The purpose of doing a
    good job, is not creating a cleanup problem later.

    Paul

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Nov 25 08:03:35 2024
    On Sun, 11/24/2024 10:51 AM, s|b wrote:
    On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:19:46 +0100, s|b wrote:

    When I flip the switch of the power supply the standby power led on the
    motherboard (ASUS F1A75) turns on, stays on for a bit and then dies.

    These should be all components:


    CPU: AMD-A8-3870 BLACK EDITION WITH RADEON HD 6550D

    Tower/PSU: ANTEC-NSK4482B-EC 380 WATT

    Graphic card: AMD-AP38G160U2K

    SSD: INTEL-SSDSC2CW120A310 120GB 520 SERIES 34NM SATA III2 .

    HDD: WESTERN DIGITAL-WD5000AAKX 500GB 16MB SATA600 7200RPM

    CD/DVD (re)writer: LITE-ON-IHAS122-18 SATA 22X DVD-RW


    That is not too heavy of a load.

    Paul

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Nov 26 00:38:03 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 14:28:54 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    Here's another guy gobbing
    on way too much thermal paste: https://youtu.be/a0LlMDk_ljQ?t=12.

    This guy is doing a lot better, I think: <https://youtu.be/eyNTXDoLyEU?feature=shared>

    I don't think my MX-4 comes with a spatula, but I've cut 1/3 of a
    plastic card which I'll be using.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Nov 26 00:58:48 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 15:21:47 -0500, Paul wrote:

    No, you don't generally spread them with a credit card any more.

    Some versions of the MX-4 come with a spatula. This guy seems to be
    doing it right: <https://youtu.be/eyNTXDoLyEU?feature=shared>

    You don't want too much shooting out of the gap,
    as then it's a mess to clean up later if it gets
    into the wrong places on the motherboard.

    The guy in the YT spilled on a few places, but he seems to be alright.
    In comparison to others he uses very little paste, seems even less than
    the 'pea' a lot of people advise.

    I have a tube of AS-5 here, and it's suitable for
    applying dots (according to what the manufacturer
    recommends for each processor type), then just seat
    the heatsink in it and tighten it up. Some processors
    only use a central dot. Some processors are convex,
    some processors are flat on top, which is why the
    dot pattern recommendation varies.

    Good to know.

    It is for this reason, that I recommend third party HS
    assemblies which allow removal and re-seating of the
    heatsink, without having to pull the motherboard out
    of the case.

    I can remove the heatsink without a problem.

    As long as the manufacturers use 1x2 cellphone
    capacitors on the motherboard surface, you have to be a lot
    more careful to not damage the surface mount components.
    Your motherboard is an older generation and might have
    0603 or 0402 caps and the older components are a bit
    bigger and harder to damage without a bit more effort.

    That's a good thing, right? (-:

    The MX-4 has the ability to spread easily. The temperature
    different generally is only a couple degrees C between
    competitors. But when a compound spreads (these are not
    phase change compounds like the screened ones that come
    with the heatsink are), you may have to redo it five years
    from now. The temperature rise will tell you it is time to change it.

    I'm making a note of that. I bought the PC in 2012, so there's a good
    chance it's the CPU and not the PSU that causes the shutdown?

    https://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/3383/arctic_cooling_mx_4_thermal_compound/index.html

    The problem with getting, say, a new heatsink for a build,
    is you ruin the screened material while having trouble
    fitting the screws. I've had trouble tightening the screws
    on any of the last four (third-party) heatsinks, and none of
    them had the screw threads "catch" on the first try. I was
    a lather of sweat, lots of cursing, before the damn screws
    were finally fitted. And that might have been the third time
    I applied paste. This is why, if a screened material is placed
    on the brand new heatsink, you hardly get to keep that compound
    and have to use your tube of MX-4 instead. Fitting these things
    is a nuisance.

    The heatsink I have works with two clamps (?) which have to be attached
    left and right and then you pull a lever to tighten it to the CPU.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Nov 26 01:03:46 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:03:35 -0500, Paul wrote:

    That is not too heavy of a load.

    If I get it to work again I'm probably going to use it to test some more
    Linux distributions. In the past I was that guy in the family people
    went to 'to fix their computer'. Nowadays everybody has a smartphone and
    they don't need me anymore. So maybe it's finally time I can ditch
    Windows (W11) and switch to Linux.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Nov 26 01:08:15 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 15:27:43 -0500, Paul wrote:

    No, you do a test fitting, applying your proposed dot pattern, and
    checking the spread of the compound when the heatsink is pressed into it.

    And then clean up that mess again?

    The size of the "contact circle" as the paste spreads, tells you

    1) Whether the dot was the right size.
    2) Whether it should have been a five dot pattern.

    I think I'll try the small dot and (self made) spatula like the guy in
    the YT vid. He says everybody's going to hate him for it, but he's been
    doing it for years.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Nov 26 09:33:05 2024
    On Mon, 11/25/2024 8:58 AM, s|b wrote:

    I'm making a note of that. I bought the PC in 2012, so there's a good
    chance it's the CPU and not the PSU that causes the shutdown?


    Unlikely.

    If a heatsink falls off the CPU, the temperature shoots up to 200C,
    the thermal protection does not engage immediately, that
    could damage a CPU.

    But really, with the heatsink fastened to the top, there is
    thermal inertia (mass) and the temperature does not shoot up
    quite as rapidly.

    It's more likely a capacitor is leaking near the CPU socket,
    if the board won't start.

    But your case, your initial symptoms were an overloaded +5VSB.
    I suggested measuring the current, as one way to ascertain
    if there is a specific problem with the combination of
    components. If something is shorted on the motherboard,
    then the problem (box shuts off), may still be present
    with your spare supply installed. You would put in the
    spare supply. The LED would be lit for a minute or two,
    then go off on its own. That could be an overload of +5VSB
    for example.

    Modern motherboards (yours is modern enough), have THERMTRIP.
    If the CPU goes over 100C to 120C or so, THERMTRIP causes
    PSON# to be deasserted and the PC fans stop spinning, and
    3.3V/5V/12V are then powered off. You can have a shutdown
    due to a thermal issue. The Asus LED remains lit when that happens
    (a THERMTRIP).

    But the thing is, you told us that the Asus LED, which
    monitors +5VSB, that went OFF. That's an indication of
    a power supply problem, not a THERMTRIP. THERMTRIP will
    not turn that LED off.

    The LED then, is key to determining whether you have
    a "NEW" or "DIFFERENT" problem than the first one reported.

    1) Swap out power supply. Put in known-good supply.
    2) Record symptoms again. Does PC shut off as before ?
    Does the Asus LED stay lit after the erroneous shutdown ?

    Report back.

    Paul


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Nov 26 10:09:12 2024
    On Mon, 11/25/2024 9:03 AM, s|b wrote:
    On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:03:35 -0500, Paul wrote:

    That is not too heavy of a load.

    If I get it to work again I'm probably going to use it to test some more Linux distributions. In the past I was that guy in the family people
    went to 'to fix their computer'. Nowadays everybody has a smartphone and
    they don't need me anymore. So maybe it's finally time I can ditch
    Windows (W11) and switch to Linux.


    Each sub-ecosystem in Linux has its own personality.

    As a newcomer, you would select one of the less aggressive groups
    of people, select an OS where people actually help one another.

    The other ingredient, would be, is the person making the distro,
    making it for the wrong reasons ? The ones working on "commercial gain"
    or "wishing to have their company complete an IPO stock offering",
    these will not be the best makers of Linux. They will inject
    all sorts of handcuff garbage which promotes their business
    interests, and not your ease of use.

    Sure, I recommend you test a few Linux OSes. Some have a deliberate
    interest in your comfort with the project (Zorin Lite, the free version).
    Zorin is a commercial project, where other SKUs are the "fancy" version
    of Zorin Lite. Zorin seeks to promote "direct Linux sales", not
    a "support contract $150 per year please" model. Whereas Ubuntu,
    the Canonical eventual goal is a support contract.

    At one time, Ubuntu existed to make a distro for end users,
    and there wasn't an initial rush to commercialize it instantly.
    But Shuttleworth wants to "cash out". He has been funding this
    thing for decades, from his personal wealth, and now, he
    wants the money back :-) He's invested a lot of himself in
    the project, and when his attempts to float an IPO failed,
    he took some of the investor comments to heart, and is now
    building a "Red Hat" competitor of sorts. And this is why,
    if Ubuntu bites you on the ass, you know why it is biting
    you on the ass.

    Debian 35000 packages, distro has the odd rough edge
    / \__
    Ubuntu \ Uses Debian, better patch fit/finish on programs, "wants to be RedHat"
    / \ \
    / LinuxMint \ End user focus, will use Ubuntu until no longer tenable, all free distros (no Snaps)
    | \
    | LMDE Debian-based version of LinuxMint, for "life without Ubuntu"
    |
    Zorin End user focus, free and paid SKUs available (need paid SKUs to pay for bandwidth)

    And this is how you have to know your neighborhood, to plan
    for the future when the future arrives.

    Paul

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Wed Nov 27 04:44:54 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:33:05 -0500, Paul wrote:


    I'm making a note of that. I bought the PC in 2012, so there's a good chance it's the CPU and not the PSU that causes the shutdown?

    Unlikely.

    )-:

    If a heatsink falls off the CPU, the temperature shoots up to 200C,
    the thermal protection does not engage immediately, that
    could damage a CPU.

    But really, with the heatsink fastened to the top, there is
    thermal inertia (mass) and the temperature does not shoot up
    quite as rapidly.

    That's disappointing, sort of. But I do get to play with the paste.

    It's more likely a capacitor is leaking near the CPU socket,
    if the board won't start.

    Well then it's removing the hard drives and dump the tower at a recycle
    point! If I'll bring it to a computer repair store they will charge me
    an arm and a leg.

    But your case, your initial symptoms were an overloaded +5VSB.
    I suggested measuring the current, as one way to ascertain
    if there is a specific problem with the combination of
    components. If something is shorted on the motherboard,
    then the problem (box shuts off), may still be present
    with your spare supply installed. You would put in the
    spare supply. The LED would be lit for a minute or two,
    then go off on its own. That could be an overload of +5VSB
    for example.

    I'm learning new things here. It's my brother who knows electricity; I'm
    100% sure he's got the equipment to measure.

    I checked the PSU that I hopefully can use:

    AOpen
    Model no: Z400-08FC (400W peak)

    Modern motherboards (yours is modern enough), have THERMTRIP.
    If the CPU goes over 100C to 120C or so, THERMTRIP causes
    PSON# to be deasserted and the PC fans stop spinning, and
    3.3V/5V/12V are then powered off. You can have a shutdown
    due to a thermal issue. The Asus LED remains lit when that happens
    (a THERMTRIP).

    But the thing is, you told us that the Asus LED, which
    monitors +5VSB, that went OFF. That's an indication of
    a power supply problem, not a THERMTRIP. THERMTRIP will
    not turn that LED off.

    OK, tnx. Does this also fit in the fact that I sometimes get to the BIOS (however briefly it is) ?

    The LED then, is key to determining whether you have
    a "NEW" or "DIFFERENT" problem than the first one reported.

    1) Swap out power supply. Put in known-good supply.
    2) Record symptoms again. Does PC shut off as before ?
    Does the Asus LED stay lit after the erroneous shutdown ?

    Report back.

    Will do when you confirm I can use the other PSU. It's ATX, so I'm
    guessing yes?

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Wed Nov 27 09:31:52 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    Well then it's removing the hard drives and dump the tower at a recycle point! If I'll bring it to a computer repair store they will charge me
    an arm and a leg.

    If you're removing the components from the case leaving just a metal
    shell for the case, that can go in your recycle bin along with all the
    cans for food (after rinsing them). Just remove any screws since those
    are hardened, and not recyclable. If there are plastic covers, like
    over the front, remove those to dump in the trash.

    The PCBs have lead for the solder. Those, and other components with
    hazardous materials can be dropped off at the local hazard waste site.
    They charge me $10 per load no matter how much I bring in (so I amass a
    bunch of stuff before going) except for special items, like tires and
    big heavy bulky stuff. Don't know if you have any hazardous waste
    collection locations. Often they are run by the municipality or
    counties.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Wed Nov 27 09:37:21 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 14:28:54 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    Here's another guy gobbing
    on way too much thermal paste: https://youtu.be/a0LlMDk_ljQ?t=12.

    This guy is doing a lot better, I think: <https://youtu.be/eyNTXDoLyEU?feature=shared>

    I don't think my MX-4 comes with a spatula, but I've cut 1/3 of a
    plastic card which I'll be using.

    The "card" should be thin and pliable. The spatula is okay, but I
    prefer a piece of a mylar sheet. The amount the YT author used is the
    right amount. I apply until the layer is just translucent, and then
    twist the HSF onto the CPU plate while pressing down. Then I remove to
    gauge my result. I have to clean the HSF and CPU again, and do new
    paste while making an adjustment if my prior effort deficient. Unless
    you are building computers, and need to save on the paste, even a tiny
    tube gives you 5 to 10 applications, or more, which is plenty to get it
    right for just one setup. You're not gluing the HSF to the CPU, so you
    can repeat until you get it right.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Wed Nov 27 13:04:00 2024
    On Tue, 11/26/2024 12:44 PM, s|b wrote:
    On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:33:05 -0500, Paul wrote:


    I'm making a note of that. I bought the PC in 2012, so there's a good
    chance it's the CPU and not the PSU that causes the shutdown?

    Unlikely.

    )-:

    If a heatsink falls off the CPU, the temperature shoots up to 200C,
    the thermal protection does not engage immediately, that
    could damage a CPU.

    But really, with the heatsink fastened to the top, there is
    thermal inertia (mass) and the temperature does not shoot up
    quite as rapidly.

    That's disappointing, sort of. But I do get to play with the paste.

    It's more likely a capacitor is leaking near the CPU socket,
    if the board won't start.

    Well then it's removing the hard drives and dump the tower at a recycle point! If I'll bring it to a computer repair store they will charge me
    an arm and a leg.

    But your case, your initial symptoms were an overloaded +5VSB.
    I suggested measuring the current, as one way to ascertain
    if there is a specific problem with the combination of
    components. If something is shorted on the motherboard,
    then the problem (box shuts off), may still be present
    with your spare supply installed. You would put in the
    spare supply. The LED would be lit for a minute or two,
    then go off on its own. That could be an overload of +5VSB
    for example.

    I'm learning new things here. It's my brother who knows electricity; I'm
    100% sure he's got the equipment to measure.

    I checked the PSU that I hopefully can use:

    AOpen
    Model no: Z400-08FC (400W peak)

    Modern motherboards (yours is modern enough), have THERMTRIP.
    If the CPU goes over 100C to 120C or so, THERMTRIP causes
    PSON# to be deasserted and the PC fans stop spinning, and
    3.3V/5V/12V are then powered off. You can have a shutdown
    due to a thermal issue. The Asus LED remains lit when that happens
    (a THERMTRIP).

    But the thing is, you told us that the Asus LED, which
    monitors +5VSB, that went OFF. That's an indication of
    a power supply problem, not a THERMTRIP. THERMTRIP will
    not turn that LED off.

    OK, tnx. Does this also fit in the fact that I sometimes get to the BIOS (however briefly it is) ?

    The LED then, is key to determining whether you have
    a "NEW" or "DIFFERENT" problem than the first one reported.

    1) Swap out power supply. Put in known-good supply.
    2) Record symptoms again. Does PC shut off as before ?
    Does the Asus LED stay lit after the erroneous shutdown ?

    Report back.

    Will do when you confirm I can use the other PSU. It's ATX, so I'm
    guessing yes?


    AOpen Z400-08FC (400W peak) [Numbers are different than the 380D supply]

    5V 3.3V 12V1 12V2 -12V +5VSB [ no PCIe 1 x 6-pin ? ]

    20A 20A 10A 13A 0.3A 2.5A
    \ / \ /
    130W 23A common
    combined source

    12V2 is CPU
    12V1 is peripherals, PCIe slots

    "ASUS F1A75" it is probably the 3870K entry below.

    A guess would be, it can't be over about 100W or 12V @ 10A to allow some efficiency room. The Z400 has 13A available for the 10A load, which is
    pretty full.

    https://www.asus.com/me-en/supportonly/f1a75-v%20pro/helpdesk_cpu/ <=== check the table, your CPU
    is in that table
    AMD A8-3870K (AD3870WNZ43GX, rev.B0, 3.0GHz, QC, L2:4M, HD6550D, 100W)

    The 12V1 has 10A for things like a video card (if present). If
    you took the video output of your APU (CPU has GPU inside), then
    the biggest drain after that would be HDD and ODD, and 10A is
    enough for that (12V @ 1.5A ODD, 12V @ 2A HDD).

    The AOpen is enough for a basic PC.

    CPU: AMD-A8-3870 BLACK EDITION WITH RADEON HD 6550D
    Tower/PSU: ANTEC-NSK4482B-EC 380 WATT
    Graphic card: AMD-AP38G160U2K <=============================== I can find no info for this.
    SSD: INTEL-SSDSC2CW120A310 120GB 520 SERIES 34NM SATA III2 .
    HDD: WESTERN DIGITAL-WD5000AAKX 500GB 16MB SATA600 7200RPM
    CD/DVD (re)writer: LITE-ON-IHAS122-18 SATA 22X DVD-RW

    I'm not getting a match on your video card.
    Both search engines aren't matching on "AP38G160U2K"

    The graphics function inside the 100W APU is HD6550D.

    The thing is, your Peripheral supply 12V1 is only 10 amps,
    and that's not going to be enough for much of a standalone
    video card in an expansion slot.

    The motherboard has four video connectors on the plate.
    It has DVI-D, VGA, HDMI, DisplayPort. These run off the APU (CPU+GPU) chip
    and so to make the PC work, you don't even need a separate video card.

    https://www.legitreviews.com/images/reviews/1721/asus-f1a75-v-pro-layout-6.jpg

    Normally, if you had purchased a separate video card, it would
    go in the long, dark-blue slot on the left of this picture.

    https://www.legitreviews.com/images/reviews/1721/asus-f1a75-v-pro-layout-5.jpg

    ( https://www.legitreviews.com/asus-f1a75-v-pro-motherboard-review_1721/3 )

    The thing is, the AOpen supply is unlikely to have a PCI Express 2x3 power connector on it. And a small video card might need a power source like that. That's why knowing some details about what you are actually
    using for video is important.

    Next to the long, dark-blue4 slot on the left of the picture,
    is the round CMOS battery CR2032.

    Using your multimeter, you can connect the black lead to the chassis metal
    (the VGA screw would do) and the red lead to the top of the CMOS cell, and
    that should read +3.0 volts on the 20V scale of the meter, if the cell was new. If the PC has been sitting in a closet for more than 3 years, then
    the CMOS battery will be flat, and you will need to purchase a
    replacement CR2032 to put in the round socket. I have replaced a lot
    of these here, because the PCs sitting in the junk room, wear that
    battery down quickly. Only a few PCs will not start, unless that
    battery has at least 2.0V on it. The battery is a bit higher than
    3.0V when new.

    The motherboard will not "remember" the BIOS settings you enter, unless
    the battery is functioning. The clock for example, will show the wrong time.

    Using your debug technique of "swap it out", you do not need to
    replace the CR2032 right away. However, if you fit the Z400 supply,
    and the Asus LED lights up, but pressing the power button does not
    work, then replacing the CR2032 would be the next step.

    *******

    summary: Please examine the contents of the PC and confirm how your
    video works. Is there an add-in card in one of the long slots ?
    Or are you using a video connector in the group-of-four connectors
    in the Legitreviews picture ? It you are using a separate video card,
    there may not be enough power for it, or a connector to feed the
    card power.

    Paul


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Thu Nov 28 01:38:09 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:31:52 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    If you're removing the components from the case leaving just a metal
    shell for the case, that can go in your recycle bin along with all the
    cans for food (after rinsing them). Just remove any screws since those
    are hardened, and not recyclable. If there are plastic covers, like
    over the front, remove those to dump in the trash.

    In Belgium we have Recupel. I can either bring it back to the place that
    sold it to me or I can bring it to a 'recyclagepark' and they're
    responsible for the recycling. I'll do the latter.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Thu Nov 28 01:45:11 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:51:38 +0100, s|b wrote:

    Graphic card: AMD-AP38G160U2K

    Ugh, these are the DDR3 modules. This is the graphic card:

    ASUS-EAH5450 SILENT/DI/ 512MB GDDR PCI EXPRESS

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Thu Nov 28 02:01:17 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:04:00 -0500, Paul wrote:

    Graphic card: AMD-AP38G160U2K <=============================== I can find no info for this.

    That's my fault; these are the 2 DDR3 modules. This is the graphic card:

    ASUS-EAH5450 SILENT/DI/ 512MB GDDR PCI EXPRESS

    I'm not getting a match on your video card.
    Both search engines aren't matching on "AP38G160U2K"

    <https://www.startpage.com/do/dsearch?q=AP38G1608U2K&cat=web&language=english>

    <https://tweakers.net/pricewatch/302780/amd-performance-ap38g1608u2k/specificaties/>

    The graphics function inside the 100W APU is HD6550D.

    I know. I should have used that one and the shop should have mentioned
    it to me, but I got a PCIe ienstead.

    The thing is, your Peripheral supply 12V1 is only 10 amps,
    and that's not going to be enough for much of a standalone
    video card in an expansion slot.

    So better not try then.

    The motherboard has four video connectors on the plate.
    It has DVI-D, VGA, HDMI, DisplayPort. These run off the APU (CPU+GPU) chip and so to make the PC work, you don't even need a separate video card.

    https://www.legitreviews.com/images/reviews/1721/asus-f1a75-v-pro-layout-6.jpg

    See above. I got the card that I didn't really need. I don't play games
    on PC or anything.

    Normally, if you had purchased a separate video card, it would
    go in the long, dark-blue slot on the left of this picture.

    https://www.legitreviews.com/images/reviews/1721/asus-f1a75-v-pro-layout-5.jpg

    That's where it is.

    The thing is, the AOpen supply is unlikely to have a PCI Express 2x3 power connector on it. And a small video card might need a power source like that. That's why knowing some details about what you are actually
    using for video is important.

    My fault, I'm sorry. This shoul d be it:

    ASUS-EAH5450 SILENT/DI/ 512MB GDDR PCI EXPRESS

    Next to the long, dark-blue4 slot on the left of the picture,
    is the round CMOS battery CR2032.

    Yeah, I replaced that already and then did a BIOS reset by replacing the
    jumper (and then back).

    The motherboard will not "remember" the BIOS settings you enter, unless
    the battery is functioning. The clock for example, will show the wrong time.

    These things I'm familiar with. Long ago I did a course 'computer
    hardware'. Nothing fancy, just the basics, enough to build your own PC.
    I can do that, although I did it only twice. It's just when things
    (hardware) start breaking down I lack the knowledge.

    Using your debug technique of "swap it out", you do not need to
    replace the CR2032 right away. However, if you fit the Z400 supply,
    and the Asus LED lights up, but pressing the power button does not
    work, then replacing the CR2032 would be the next step.

    I checked ealier: the PSU has an on/off button at the back. If I switch
    it on the LED lights up, but only for a short time. After it switches
    off nothing happens when I push the button of the tower.

    summary: Please examine the contents of the PC and confirm how your
    video works. Is there an add-in card in one of the long slots ?
    Or are you using a video connector in the group-of-four connectors
    in the Legitreviews picture ? It you are using a separate video card,
    there may not be enough power for it, or a connector to feed the
    card power.

    Again, tnx for taking your time. This is the graphic card (that I didn't
    really need :-) :

    ASUS-EAH5450 SILENT/DI/ 512MB GDDR PCI EXPRESS

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Thu Nov 28 02:05:47 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:37:21 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    The "card" should be thin and pliable. The spatula is okay, but I
    prefer a piece of a mylar sheet. The amount the YT author used is the
    right amount. I apply until the layer is just translucent, and then
    twist the HSF onto the CPU plate while pressing down. Then I remove to
    gauge my result. I have to clean the HSF and CPU again, and do new
    paste while making an adjustment if my prior effort deficient. Unless
    you are building computers, and need to save on the paste, even a tiny
    tube gives you 5 to 10 applications, or more, which is plenty to get it
    right for just one setup. You're not gluing the HSF to the CPU, so you
    can repeat until you get it right.

    I practiced a bit and then just went ahead. I thought it went pretty
    good, but... as you and Paul already stated: this isn't what causing the problem.

    I just read Paul's reaction and apparently I forgot to mention the video
    card.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Thu Nov 28 02:19:54 2024
    On Wed, 11/27/2024 10:01 AM, s|b wrote:
    On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:04:00 -0500, Paul wrote:

    Graphic card: AMD-AP38G160U2K <=============================== I can find no info for this.

    That's my fault; these are the 2 DDR3 modules. This is the graphic card:

    ASUS-EAH5450 SILENT/DI/ 512MB GDDR PCI EXPRESS

    I'm not getting a match on your video card.
    Both search engines aren't matching on "AP38G160U2K"

    <https://www.startpage.com/do/dsearch?q=AP38G1608U2K&cat=web&language=english>

    <https://tweakers.net/pricewatch/302780/amd-performance-ap38g1608u2k/specificaties/>

    The graphics function inside the 100W APU is HD6550D.

    I know. I should have used that one and the shop should have mentioned
    it to me, but I got a PCIe ienstead.

    The thing is, your Peripheral supply 12V1 is only 10 amps,
    and that's not going to be enough for much of a standalone
    video card in an expansion slot.

    So better not try then.

    The motherboard has four video connectors on the plate.
    It has DVI-D, VGA, HDMI, DisplayPort. These run off the APU (CPU+GPU) chip >> and so to make the PC work, you don't even need a separate video card.

    https://www.legitreviews.com/images/reviews/1721/asus-f1a75-v-pro-layout-6.jpg

    See above. I got the card that I didn't really need. I don't play games
    on PC or anything.

    Normally, if you had purchased a separate video card, it would
    go in the long, dark-blue slot on the left of this picture.

    https://www.legitreviews.com/images/reviews/1721/asus-f1a75-v-pro-layout-5.jpg

    That's where it is.

    The thing is, the AOpen supply is unlikely to have a PCI Express 2x3 power >> connector on it. And a small video card might need a power source like that. >> That's why knowing some details about what you are actually
    using for video is important.

    My fault, I'm sorry. This shoul d be it:

    ASUS-EAH5450 SILENT/DI/ 512MB GDDR PCI EXPRESS

    Next to the long, dark-blue4 slot on the left of the picture,
    is the round CMOS battery CR2032.

    Yeah, I replaced that already and then did a BIOS reset by replacing the jumper (and then back).

    The motherboard will not "remember" the BIOS settings you enter, unless
    the battery is functioning. The clock for example, will show the wrong time.

    These things I'm familiar with. Long ago I did a course 'computer
    hardware'. Nothing fancy, just the basics, enough to build your own PC.
    I can do that, although I did it only twice. It's just when things
    (hardware) start breaking down I lack the knowledge.

    Using your debug technique of "swap it out", you do not need to
    replace the CR2032 right away. However, if you fit the Z400 supply,
    and the Asus LED lights up, but pressing the power button does not
    work, then replacing the CR2032 would be the next step.

    I checked ealier: the PSU has an on/off button at the back. If I switch
    it on the LED lights up, but only for a short time. After it switches
    off nothing happens when I push the button of the tower.

    summary: Please examine the contents of the PC and confirm how your
    video works. Is there an add-in card in one of the long slots ?
    Or are you using a video connector in the group-of-four connectors >> in the Legitreviews picture ? It you are using a separate video card,
    there may not be enough power for it, or a connector to feed the
    card power.

    Again, tnx for taking your time. This is the graphic card (that I didn't really need :-) :

    ASUS-EAH5450 SILENT/DI/ 512MB GDDR PCI EXPRESS


    The HD5450 is the same as an HD6450 (I have that one) and
    it is a 13 watt maximum card. You will nave no trouble
    driving that, as that's a low power card suited to media center
    applications. I have that card in my Dell Optiplex, as the card
    has no power connector and runs off slot power.

    The CPU is 10A on a 13A output, which is fine. Because
    you haven't used up all your Peripheral power, there will be
    sufficient shared amperes, to not be a problem.

    The HD5450 is anywhere between 3 watts (idle) and 13 watts.
    You can't do much better than that, on a discrete card.
    And that card of mine, works in Win10 22H2. The WDM driver
    for it, is "good enough" for the job.

    *******

    Now, let's check my memory.

    Listed as 19 watts.

    https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-hd-5450.c503

    Mine is 18 watts.

    https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-hd-6450.c402

    I don't know if Furmark will run on that, for test.

    It's not a closed loop card, so if you can find a program
    to drive is hard enough, it might draw 20 watts :-)

    Paul


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 29 03:17:44 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:19:46 +0100, s|b wrote:

    I checked all cables and they should be fine. What could be causing this
    and how to solve?

    First of all: my apologies to Paul and VanguardLH. I should have just
    listened to you both and went for the PSU instead of stubbornly playing
    with thermal paste.

    Second: you were both right, it was the PSU after all. I tried the old
    one and (almost) everything works. I can even boot the Windows 7 that
    was installed on a SSD. So tnx, guys, Paul in particular, for sticking
    with me.

    And I'm saying /almost/, because the PSU only has one SATA cable and I
    need at least 3 (SSD with W7, SATA hdd for data, SATA for
    CD/DVD-(re)writer). So I'm looking to buy a (cheap) PSU that will
    support at least 4 SATA (SATA6?) devices. I think non modular would be
    the easiest?

    If someone could point me to one, maybe available at Amazon, because
    it's no use if I'm going ask to have look at stores that only show
    Dutch. (-:

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 29 04:07:29 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    And I'm saying /almost/, because the PSU only has one SATA cable and I
    need at least 3 (SSD with W7, SATA hdd for data, SATA for
    CD/DVD-(re)writer). So I'm looking to buy a (cheap) PSU that will
    support at least 4 SATA (SATA6?) devices. I think non modular would be
    the easiest?

    After Paul responds, you might get away with just using a Y-adapter
    cable (aka power splitter): one sata power connector on one end, and
    multiple sata power connectors on the other end. Typically it is a 1 to
    2 arrangment, but you could use another Y-adapter to go 1 to 2, and then another 1 to 2, to give you 3 total. Presumably the sata power and sata
    data pins are not all in 1 connector, but instead the sata power
    (between PSU and drive) is a separate connector from the sata data
    connector (between drive and mobo).

    You might not get enough length to reach all drives with just a chained
    1-to-2 splitter. There are sata power splitters that have 4 and even 5 connectors (not including the 1 that mates to the PSU sata power
    connector) that can reach 24" in length. The placement of the
    in-between connectors may not be optimal for all drives, but 4 of them
    in a 5 connector cable should reach your drives.

    https://www.newegg.com/p/pl?d=sata+power+splitter

    You would have to check the power spec on the SATA output from the PSU
    to ensure it will handle the load for all 4 of your drives. Not an
    issue with SSDs, but the spinners (HDD and optic) have a startup surge
    current.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 29 11:30:42 2024
    On Thu, 11/28/2024 12:07 PM, VanguardLH wrote:
    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    And I'm saying /almost/, because the PSU only has one SATA cable and I
    need at least 3 (SSD with W7, SATA hdd for data, SATA for
    CD/DVD-(re)writer). So I'm looking to buy a (cheap) PSU that will
    support at least 4 SATA (SATA6?) devices. I think non modular would be
    the easiest?

    After Paul responds, you might get away with just using a Y-adapter
    cable (aka power splitter): one sata power connector on one end, and
    multiple sata power connectors on the other end. Typically it is a 1 to
    2 arrangment, but you could use another Y-adapter to go 1 to 2, and then another 1 to 2, to give you 3 total. Presumably the sata power and sata
    data pins are not all in 1 connector, but instead the sata power
    (between PSU and drive) is a separate connector from the sata data
    connector (between drive and mobo).

    You might not get enough length to reach all drives with just a chained 1-to-2 splitter. There are sata power splitters that have 4 and even 5 connectors (not including the 1 that mates to the PSU sata power
    connector) that can reach 24" in length. The placement of the
    in-between connectors may not be optimal for all drives, but 4 of them
    in a 5 connector cable should reach your drives.

    https://www.newegg.com/p/pl?d=sata+power+splitter

    You would have to check the power spec on the SATA output from the PSU
    to ensure it will handle the load for all 4 of your drives. Not an
    issue with SSDs, but the spinners (HDD and optic) have a startup surge current.


    The SATA pins are rated for one ampere per contact, three contacts
    in parallel, 3A max per rail. The SATA power design assumes power
    is not being drawn from all three rails at the same time. Usually
    only two of three rails have a power demand (not that it matters).

    If used for splitting, you would check what kind of current the hard drive draws. The max current is at spinup, and can be 1.5-2A or so. Spinning
    up two drives on a SATA to SATA splitter would be the limit that way.
    This is why I don't recommend 1-to-3 or long chains of these for fanout.

    SATA-power
    /
    SATA-power ----- 1-to-2 is safe for this
    \
    SATA-power This cabling has 3.3V, 5V, 12V on it

    The power supply likely has Molex. Molex can take 6 to 10 amps,
    depending on nearest-neighbors (a Molex 1x4 is a short connector
    so not a thermal issue). The thicker the gauge of wire, the
    closer to 10 amps you get. I generally assume 6 amps per wire in
    conversations here (as the wire gauges used may not be the best).
    This kind of thing would work. The 3.3V rail which is missing
    this way, is not usually a problem. Only the microSATA drives
    potentially used 3.3V (there are no longer microSATA at retail).

    ----+
    | SATA-power
    | /
    +--- Molex ------
    | \
    | SATA-power
    |
    | SATA-power
    | /
    +--- Molex ------
    \
    SATA-power This cabling has 5V, 12V (suited to most regular SATA)

    If you use too many adapters sequentially, eventually
    the 12V supply falls to 11V at the end of the cabling.
    If you hear "clicking sounds" from your hard drive, this
    is a sign the 12V supply is approaching 11V and the drive
    will not reliably stay rotating that way. Shorten the
    chain of cables, rearrange the chain, and the clicking
    will stop. This has happened to be *twice* :-)

    *******

    3 Molex, 3 SATA, 2 PCIe $55 EVGA 600 BR 100-BR-0600-K1 600 W

    https://www.newegg.com/evga-600-br-100-br-0600-k1-600-w-80-plus-bronze-certified/p/N82E16817438146

    Similar Thermaltake, power rating not as nice, vent design not so good, 600 W Gold, $59

    https://www.newegg.com/thermaltake-toughpower-gx2-gold-ps-tpd-0600nnfagu-2-600-w-80-plus-gold-certified/p/N82E16817153415

    You'll have to check the customer reviews, and see if anyone has figured out the real manufacturer.
    The lower-price items can be contract manufactured by a competitor.

    There are some Silverstone supplies, but the prices are likely to be too high.

    *******

    Summary:

    See if there are enough Molex connectors, to use two of these, to power four drives.
    Don't buy this particular one, wires might not be long enough.

    "Molex to two SATA, no metal clamp on these ones"

    https://c1.neweggimages.com/productimage/nb1280/A20PS2307010DGQDZC4.jpg

    Check the wire length on the items, to make sure the wires will
    reach all the drives.

    If you look in the mouth of the SATA, some 15 pin SATA on extenders, are missing
    3 of the contacts, and only 12 contacts are loaded in the connector. I like
    to buy products that load *all* the contacts (15 of them), for equal insertion force across the connector. The only way to look in the mouth of the connector, is to shop retail and inspect the damn things :-)

    The metal clamp is unnecessary, and there isn't always a place for the
    clamp to clamp on to. The metal clamp is good on the seven pin data cable.

    If it comes with a metal clamp, well OK, but the metal clamp is not
    a necessity and none of my adapters have that clamp on them. The retention force on the 15 pin ensures it is not going to fall off.

    Paul



    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 29 12:34:30 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

    On Thu, 11/28/2024 12:07 PM, VanguardLH wrote:
    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    And I'm saying /almost/, because the PSU only has one SATA cable and I
    need at least 3 (SSD with W7, SATA hdd for data, SATA for
    CD/DVD-(re)writer). So I'm looking to buy a (cheap) PSU that will
    support at least 4 SATA (SATA6?) devices. I think non modular would be
    the easiest?

    After Paul responds, you might get away with just using a Y-adapter
    cable (aka power splitter): one sata power connector on one end, and
    multiple sata power connectors on the other end. Typically it is a 1 to
    2 arrangment, but you could use another Y-adapter to go 1 to 2, and then
    another 1 to 2, to give you 3 total. Presumably the sata power and sata
    data pins are not all in 1 connector, but instead the sata power
    (between PSU and drive) is a separate connector from the sata data
    connector (between drive and mobo).

    You might not get enough length to reach all drives with just a chained
    1-to-2 splitter. There are sata power splitters that have 4 and even 5
    connectors (not including the 1 that mates to the PSU sata power
    connector) that can reach 24" in length. The placement of the
    in-between connectors may not be optimal for all drives, but 4 of them
    in a 5 connector cable should reach your drives.

    https://www.newegg.com/p/pl?d=sata+power+splitter

    You would have to check the power spec on the SATA output from the PSU
    to ensure it will handle the load for all 4 of your drives. Not an
    issue with SSDs, but the spinners (HDD and optic) have a startup surge
    current.


    The SATA pins are rated for one ampere per contact, three contacts
    in parallel, 3A max per rail. The SATA power design assumes power
    is not being drawn from all three rails at the same time. Usually
    only two of three rails have a power demand (not that it matters).

    If used for splitting, you would check what kind of current the hard drive draws. The max current is at spinup, and can be 1.5-2A or so. Spinning
    up two drives on a SATA to SATA splitter would be the limit that way.
    This is why I don't recommend 1-to-3 or long chains of these for fanout.

    SATA-power
    /
    SATA-power ----- 1-to-2 is safe for this
    \
    SATA-power This cabling has 3.3V, 5V, 12V on it

    The power supply likely has Molex. Molex can take 6 to 10 amps,
    depending on nearest-neighbors (a Molex 1x4 is a short connector
    so not a thermal issue). The thicker the gauge of wire, the
    closer to 10 amps you get. I generally assume 6 amps per wire in conversations here (as the wire gauges used may not be the best).
    This kind of thing would work. The 3.3V rail which is missing
    this way, is not usually a problem. Only the microSATA drives
    potentially used 3.3V (there are no longer microSATA at retail).

    ----+
    | SATA-power
    | /
    +--- Molex ------
    | \
    | SATA-power
    |
    | SATA-power
    | /
    +--- Molex ------
    \
    SATA-power This cabling has 5V, 12V (suited to most regular SATA)

    If you use too many adapters sequentially, eventually
    the 12V supply falls to 11V at the end of the cabling.
    If you hear "clicking sounds" from your hard drive, this
    is a sign the 12V supply is approaching 11V and the drive
    will not reliably stay rotating that way. Shorten the
    chain of cables, rearrange the chain, and the clicking
    will stop. This has happened to be *twice* :-)

    *******

    3 Molex, 3 SATA, 2 PCIe $55 EVGA 600 BR 100-BR-0600-K1 600 W

    https://www.newegg.com/evga-600-br-100-br-0600-k1-600-w-80-plus-bronze-certified/p/N82E16817438146

    Similar Thermaltake, power rating not as nice, vent design not so good, 600 W Gold, $59

    https://www.newegg.com/thermaltake-toughpower-gx2-gold-ps-tpd-0600nnfagu-2-600-w-80-plus-gold-certified/p/N82E16817153415

    You'll have to check the customer reviews, and see if anyone has figured out the real manufacturer.
    The lower-price items can be contract manufactured by a competitor.

    There are some Silverstone supplies, but the prices are likely to be too high.

    *******

    Summary:

    See if there are enough Molex connectors, to use two of these, to power four drives.
    Don't buy this particular one, wires might not be long enough.

    "Molex to two SATA, no metal clamp on these ones"

    https://c1.neweggimages.com/productimage/nb1280/A20PS2307010DGQDZC4.jpg

    Check the wire length on the items, to make sure the wires will
    reach all the drives.

    If you look in the mouth of the SATA, some 15 pin SATA on extenders, are missing
    3 of the contacts, and only 12 contacts are loaded in the connector. I like to buy products that load *all* the contacts (15 of them), for equal insertion
    force across the connector. The only way to look in the mouth of the connector,
    is to shop retail and inspect the damn things :-)

    The metal clamp is unnecessary, and there isn't always a place for the
    clamp to clamp on to. The metal clamp is good on the seven pin data cable.

    If it comes with a metal clamp, well OK, but the metal clamp is not
    a necessity and none of my adapters have that clamp on them. The retention force on the 15 pin ensures it is not going to fall off.

    Paul

    Some PSUs still have cabling for floppy drives. There are adapters to
    change to sata power. Are those safe to use for sata power?

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 29 21:21:01 2024
    On Thu, 11/28/2024 8:34 PM, VanguardLH wrote:


    Some PSUs still have cabling for floppy drives. There are adapters to
    change to sata power. Are those safe to use for sata power?


    There might be one of those floppy connectors on the supply.
    Maybe a supply older than my collection, had one of those on the end of both looms.

    http://www.playtool.com/pages/psuconnectors/connectors.html

    "The four pin floppy drive cable showed up
    when PCs started including 3.5 inch floppy drives."

    Socket housing Socket Maximum current per circuit
    AMP 171822-4 AMP 170262-1 3 amps

    That means you could draw 3 amps from +12V and 3 amps from +5V.
    At a stretch, that's two hard drives off one "adapter",
    assuming you can find a "floppy connector to two SATA 15p"
    adapter. It is basically the same situation, as a SATA to two SATA
    adapter.

    At one time, the power footprint of a hard drive was close to 40W.
    (That's also why the sleds had three fans blowing across the surface.)
    Drawing 3 amps from +12V was a real possibility. Today, the small capacity
    boot drives, the manufacturer wants those to spin up in five seconds,
    so the current will be closer to 2 amps on +12V. For the
    higher capacity drives, with more platters, more mass, they
    turn the max current down, and make use of a 20-25 second
    startup before those are ready. Some of the BIOS are set
    to time out after 35 seconds, which gives some idea how
    much faster than necessary the boot drive is at 5 seconds.

    I haven't timed my single sample 18TB drive, but after it spins up,
    it still does not ID itself, and it insists on rattling the
    heads and doing self test, before it'll talk to anyone.

    *******

    They spin up forty five identical 4TB Seagate drives at once and it draws 50 amps
    on the +12V rail. That works out to a bit more than 1 amp of spinup current. That's not considered a boot drive, which is why the current is that low
    at start. This measurement is not being done with staggered spin enabled
    in the pod.

    https://www.45drives.com/blog/storage/the-power-behind-large-data-storage/

    I measured two small boot drives:

    WD5003AZEX 1.64A startup current on +12V (yellow)
    WD1003FZEX 1.65A startup current on +12V (yellow)

    The interval at full current was so short, I missed detecting
    the peak on the second drive. And needed a second power up sequence
    to catch it. The time spent at 1.65A might be a second or so.
    with some preamble/postamble on either side of that.

    Both of those drives are 1 platter. In fact, at the end of life
    of the WD5003, they were making then with 1TB platters and
    throwing away half the capacity, in order to make drives. Of
    three of that model I bought, one was short stroked. The heads only
    go from the outer diameter of the 1TB single platter, to the middle of the single platter. Which is cool and all.

    It's possible an older drive, has a bit higher current.

    Even if two drives off one source exceeds the current by a bit,
    the duration of a second or so at that level, isn't going to hurt anything. It's not a thermally significant interval.

    Paul

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 29 22:46:56 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 11:07:29 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    After Paul responds, you might get away with just using a Y-adapter
    cable (aka power splitter): one sata power connector on one end, and
    multiple sata power connectors on the other end.

    That sounds interesting, but I'd rather have another PSU, so I can keep
    using the other one for my even older PC.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Nov 29 23:49:18 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:30:42 -0500, Paul wrote:

    3 Molex, 3 SATA, 2 PCIe $55 EVGA 600 BR 100-BR-0600-K1 600 W

    https://www.newegg.com/evga-600-br-100-br-0600-k1-600-w-80-plus-bronze-certified/p/N82E16817438146

    I've checked on amazon.com.be and practically all EVGA PSUs are
    'temporary unavailable'.

    Summary:

    See if there are enough Molex connectors, to use two of these, to power four drives.
    Don't buy this particular one, wires might not be long enough.

    I don't really need the Molex connectors, do I? It seems easier to just
    buy a new PSU with at least 4 SATA cables.

    Would this one do? It's only 42 euro.

    Thermaltake Tr2 S 500W

    <https://t.ly/6oL_g>

    <https://www.amazon.com.be/-/nl/Thermaltake-Tr2-500W-Pc-Voeding-Zwart/dp/B016WFYCD2/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2E4Z3BRYTBQ6C&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.jHC-OXbelSX_Gh1g0tjmNKgLs6PZWVj1E2rRbwx4gNbwSXIgqorHCl57DIU_Q-YBs2nrG6mKRiTY7ia00yLrqmZAlz5t52F2wybHbvp2xDRETUZcGlD7DDDTfdS7lo6MKttq42gKmVj8iBFgRZ3kp3pWX_CTASl05OPMIaFMrGTR90OxKvqqJYHoO6zRmmCPj4QmKQ3shCHY_QBuGtesLBowioCZjVhBQpI2vxKz6GrmtJn3qBpdoq0HfEBRtfW128yfBmooVOBdEERfuQ_1J1w-HiPlMtZtbCWc91YefUg.6rB3xCjCWUdUCBwofambmoKUQpN5jPD3BGsgPwzE0R4&dib_tag=se&keywords=Thermaltake%2BToughpower%2BGX2%2B80%2B&qid=1732883943&rnid=27967905031&s=computers&sprefix=thermaltake%2Btoughpower%2Bgx2%2B80%2B%2Caps%2C83&sr=1-1&th=1>

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Nov 30 03:11:00 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 13:49:18 +0100, s|b wrote:

    Would this one do? It's only 42 euro.

    Thermaltake Tr2 S 500W

    Ugh. I just saw it has 4 SATA connectors, but it's all on one cable.
    Don't want that.

    <https://www.thermaltake.com/tr2-s-500w-dc-to-dc-version.html>

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Nov 30 04:35:32 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

    VanguardLH wrote:

    Some PSUs still have cabling for floppy drives. There are adapters to
    change to sata power. Are those safe to use for sata power?

    There might be one of those floppy connectors on the supply.
    Maybe a supply older than my collection, had one of those on the end of both looms.

    http://www.playtool.com/pages/psuconnectors/connectors.html

    "The four pin floppy drive cable showed up
    when PCs started including 3.5 inch floppy drives."

    Socket housing Socket Maximum current per circuit
    AMP 171822-4 AMP 170262-1 3 amps

    That means you could draw 3 amps from +12V and 3 amps from +5V.
    At a stretch, that's two hard drives off one "adapter",
    assuming you can find a "floppy connector to two SATA 15p"
    adapter. It is basically the same situation, as a SATA to two SATA
    adapter.

    For floppy to SATA adapter, I've seen a 1-to-1 adapter: just 1 SATA
    connector. I've probably got one in my computer parts drawer.

    https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61Jy4OQLe8L.jpg

    To its SATA end, a 1-to-2 (one SATA to double SATA) cable could get
    used. That would put 2 SATA drives on the 1 floppy output from the PSU. Depends on how old is the OP's PSU as to whether or not it has a floppy
    power output.

    Looks like his ASUS F1A75 was introduced around 2011. I didn't see a
    floppy header on that mobo. It is also a mini-ITX mobo which affords
    little expandability. Looks like the OP is interested in getting a new
    PSU, anyway.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Nov 30 07:01:02 2024
    On Fri, 11/29/2024 11:11 AM, s|b wrote:
    On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 13:49:18 +0100, s|b wrote:

    Would this one do? It's only 42 euro.

    Thermaltake Tr2 S 500W

    Ugh. I just saw it has 4 SATA connectors, but it's all on one cable.
    Don't want that.

    <https://www.thermaltake.com/tr2-s-500w-dc-to-dc-version.html>


    I like to use adapters anyway :-)

    It's the flexibility of the cable I like. The adapter uses
    different wire than the "less flexible" PSU.

    Some of the "beauty queens" who hide all the wiring inside the
    computer case, and tape the wire to the metal with a ton of
    pieces of tape (out of sight), I don't bother doing things
    like that. The wire in mine just hangs down. I restrain wires
    to prevent them from falling into fans. To me, a computer
    case, it's an appliance, it's not a LED lit aquarium :-)

    You can use the SATA loom to do two drives if you wish.

    Then use the Molex loom and a single Molex-to-two-SATA
    for the other two drives.

    Technically, the PSU I'm currently using, has all the connectors
    I need, but because the wire won't bend nicely for the work,
    I am using two adapters, just to make plugging and unplugging
    two drives easier (the boot drive, the drive I'm "working on"
    as a technician machine). My optical drive is in an enclosure
    and runs off a wall wart, and I can move that to any machine not
    having an optical drive.

    *******

    On the ThermalTake URL, you can snip them this short and then
    you don't need a link shortener :-)

    https://www.amazon.com.be/-/nl/Thermaltake-Tr2-500W-Pc-Voeding-Zwart/dp/B016WFYCD2

    This is the missing picture from the Amazon page. The +5V is a little weak,
    but not likely to be a total disaster. I like then to cover 20A on the lower rails. To get the efficiency rating, the supplies would be double-forward-conversion
    (the 12V main circuit, powers a small plugin card that makes the 3.3V and 5V supplies).
    That's different to how the Pavouk picture makes the electricity.

    https://c1.neweggimages.com/productimage/nb1280/BRESD23091015WV52E6.jpg

    Cabling picture is on the Thermaltake website.

    https://www.thermaltake.com/pub/media/wysiwyg/key3/db/products/psu/Smart500W/pic3.jpg

    Peripheral 4 pin three connectors <=== Molex, use a single Molex to two SATA adapter if you want
    SATA 15 pin six connectors

    The SATA in the picture is mislabeled as "4 pin" when the connector is a 15p and the cabling will be the compression fit ribbon-style connectors.

    the supply has plenty of 12V current, and the description isn't likely
    to be entirely accurate. While the supply has a 35A transformer, the
    Molex loom likely has a 20A overcurrent detection, and the whole
    35A would not flow down the hard drive cable :-) That's for safety
    during short circuits.

    We had an incident in the lab, with a power supply with a 100A output,
    and it neglected to have that safety feature. Pretty impressive. I'm surprised my co-worker was not injured (like, a burned retina). His head was inside
    some machinery, when the short happened :-/ Having current limiters on looms
    is a good idea.

    Paul

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Nov 30 14:46:40 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

    I like to use adapters anyway :-)

    It's the flexibility of the cable I like. The adapter uses
    different wire than the "less flexible" PSU.

    Some of the "beauty queens" who hide all the wiring inside the
    computer case, and tape the wire to the metal with a ton of
    pieces of tape (out of sight), I don't bother doing things
    like that. The wire in mine just hangs down. I restrain wires
    to prevent them from falling into fans. To me, a computer
    case, it's an appliance, it's not a LED lit aquarium :-)

    The panels on my cases are solid (opaque). However, I'm still neat in
    routing the cables not only to avoid them getting into fans, but also to prevent them from blocking or slowing air flow. Typically I buy cases
    that have both side panels removable. Then, with the right-side panel
    removed, I can route the cabling underneath the mobo plate to return
    inside the case nearer the endpoint for the cable connection. I can
    also tuck extra cable lengths into the unused drive bays. I can't see
    that tape will ever last long enough to permanently retain the cables.
    However, there are self-stick cable stays or clips that can help hold
    the cables out of harm and out of air flow.

    I like modular PSUs, so I only connect the minimum number of cable looms
    to the PSU as are needed for actual connections to the mobo and devices.

    Also, the shroud around the cable harness is not for shielding, just for
    looks. You can slice that off to make the harness a lot more flexible.

    Some folks like a LED aquarium for the case. Their mobo has pretty
    LEDs, so do the fans, and a slew of other LEDs to prettify the interior.
    In fact, some folks attach Christmas lights (LED tubes) for more color.
    And RGB control in the BIOS lets them have the LEDs change color, change
    at intervals, or change according to the sound output. Took me awhile
    to figure out how to disable most of all that prettify crap on a new
    build. Looks at all the users that buy prettily colored keyboards, or
    noisy up their Windows desktop with slide shows or changing pics which
    afford no information, just inane customization.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Nov 30 22:21:35 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 15:01:02 -0500, Paul wrote:

    Technically, the PSU I'm currently using, has all the connectors
    I need, but because the wire won't bend nicely for the work,
    I am using two adapters, just to make plugging and unplugging
    two drives easier (the boot drive, the drive I'm "working on"
    as a technician machine). My optical drive is in an enclosure
    and runs off a wall wart, and I can move that to any machine not
    having an optical drive.

    I'm just going to go with the advice I got alternate.be. Told them what
    the old PSU was and asked what to replace it with, considering I needed
    at least 4 SATA connections. They advised this:

    <https://www.alternate.be/Sharkoon/SHP-Bronze-500-W-voeding/html/product/1586770>

    <https://assetscdn.loadbee.com/catalogue/zasu2wmd4974dnnm/www.sharkoon.com/Download//Cases_and_Power/PSU/SHP_Bronze/dmn_SHP-Bronze_04.pdf>

    <https://en.sharkoon.com/product/SHPBRONZE#specs>

    I just want ahead and ordered it (for about 45 euro).

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Nov 30 22:28:12 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:09:12 -0500, Paul wrote:

    Each sub-ecosystem in Linux has its own personality.

    As a newcomer, you would select one of the less aggressive groups
    of people, select an OS where people actually help one another.

    I don't even remember what I started with. I think it was Knoppix. I've
    tried Ubuntu, Xubuntu, Tails, Puppy Linux, ... Last thing I tried was
    Linux Mint. Mostly live dvd/usb, but I actually installed some on older computers.


    Sure, I recommend you test a few Linux OSes. Some have a deliberate
    interest in your comfort with the project (Zorin Lite, the free version). Zorin is a commercial project, where other SKUs are the "fancy" version
    of Zorin Lite. Zorin seeks to promote "direct Linux sales", not
    a "support contract $150 per year please" model. Whereas Ubuntu,
    the Canonical eventual goal is a support contract.

    Yeah, somewhere along the road I picked up Ubuntu was a no-no.


    Debian 35000 packages, distro has the odd rough edge
    / \__
    Ubuntu \ Uses Debian, better patch fit/finish on programs, "wants to be RedHat"
    / \ \
    / LinuxMint \ End user focus, will use Ubuntu until no longer tenable, all free distros (no Snaps)
    | \
    | LMDE Debian-based version of LinuxMint, for "life without Ubuntu"
    |
    Zorin End user focus, free and paid SKUs available (need paid SKUs to pay for bandwidth)

    And this is how you have to know your neighborhood, to plan
    for the future when the future arrives.

    Looking forward to some playing. Probably going to use VNC; cause I'm
    now using 2 screens, 2 keyboards, 2 mice, ...

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 1 02:15:48 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 15:01:02 -0500, Paul wrote:

    Technically, the PSU I'm currently using, has all the connectors
    I need, but because the wire won't bend nicely for the work,
    I am using two adapters, just to make plugging and unplugging
    two drives easier (the boot drive, the drive I'm "working on"
    as a technician machine). My optical drive is in an enclosure
    and runs off a wall wart, and I can move that to any machine not
    having an optical drive.

    I'm just going to go with the advice I got alternate.be. Told them what
    the old PSU was and asked what to replace it with, considering I needed
    at least 4 SATA connections. They advised this:

    <https://www.alternate.be/Sharkoon/SHP-Bronze-500-W-voeding/html/product/1586770>

    <https://assetscdn.loadbee.com/catalogue/zasu2wmd4974dnnm/www.sharkoon.com/Download//Cases_and_Power/PSU/SHP_Bronze/dmn_SHP-Bronze_04.pdf>

    <https://en.sharkoon.com/product/SHPBRONZE#specs>

    I just want ahead and ordered it (for about 45 euro).

    FYI, Sharkoon doesn't manufacture anything. They stick their brand on
    products made by others. So does Corsair. The quality of the rebranded product depends on the company putting their sticker on it as they
    decide the level of quality with which they are to be equated. However,
    even within a rebrander, quality can vary based on product or models.
    Sharkoon puts their sticker on computer cases, illumination kits,
    keyboards, mice, CPU water coolers, mouse pads, keyboard wrist rests,
    drive bay adapters, cables, headsets, case fans, chairs, desks,
    backpacks, and, oh yes, power supplies.

    Sharkoon rebrands PSUs from FSP and Enermax, but their QP and WPM series
    are from Channel Well (same OEM for Corsair CX series), and their Rush
    series are made by Enhance. Unless you open the PSU case, you really
    don't know whose PSU you get from Sharkoon.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/power-supply-oem-manufacturer,2913-9.html

    A decade old article, but gives you an idea that brands are not always
    the manufacturers (OEMs). This article is old, and purchasing agents at rebranders often change who are their OEMs.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-psus,4229.html

    An example of someone reviewing PSUs to determine quality. In fact, I
    remember reading articles there where they test PSUs, like to determine
    if they can actually meet their rated specs, under sustained loads at
    specs rather then transient loads, what happens to the PSUs under
    testing (some burn up at rated specs), ripple voltage, and more.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/how-we-test-psu,4042.html https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/power-supplies-101,4193.html

    You already bought the Sharkoon PSU. Hopefully whomever is the actual
    OEM/mfr is a good one for whatever you get. Sometimes you can see who
    is the OEM by looking inside the PSU case, but often the rebrander slaps
    their sticker atop the OEMs mark.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 1 03:16:52 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 09:15:48 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    FYI, Sharkoon doesn't manufacture anything. They stick their brand on products made by others. So does Corsair.

    I've had good experiences with Corsair.

    You already bought the Sharkoon PSU. Hopefully whomever is the actual OEM/mfr is a good one for whatever you get. Sometimes you can see who
    is the OEM by looking inside the PSU case, but often the rebrander slaps their sticker atop the OEMs mark.

    I don't want to be rude, but I just wanted a cheap PSU and I got one.
    It's not much, but the 2 reviews it has are both 5 stars. Also, I'm in
    Europe, so there's a minimum warranty of 2 years.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 1 03:31:53 2024
    On Sat, 11/30/2024 10:15 AM, VanguardLH wrote:
    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 15:01:02 -0500, Paul wrote:

    Technically, the PSU I'm currently using, has all the connectors
    I need, but because the wire won't bend nicely for the work,
    I am using two adapters, just to make plugging and unplugging
    two drives easier (the boot drive, the drive I'm "working on"
    as a technician machine). My optical drive is in an enclosure
    and runs off a wall wart, and I can move that to any machine not
    having an optical drive.

    I'm just going to go with the advice I got alternate.be. Told them what
    the old PSU was and asked what to replace it with, considering I needed
    at least 4 SATA connections. They advised this:

    <https://www.alternate.be/Sharkoon/SHP-Bronze-500-W-voeding/html/product/1586770>

    <https://assetscdn.loadbee.com/catalogue/zasu2wmd4974dnnm/www.sharkoon.com/Download//Cases_and_Power/PSU/SHP_Bronze/dmn_SHP-Bronze_04.pdf>

    <https://en.sharkoon.com/product/SHPBRONZE#specs>

    I just want ahead and ordered it (for about 45 euro).

    FYI, Sharkoon doesn't manufacture anything. They stick their brand on products made by others. So does Corsair. The quality of the rebranded product depends on the company putting their sticker on it as they
    decide the level of quality with which they are to be equated. However,
    even within a rebrander, quality can vary based on product or models. Sharkoon puts their sticker on computer cases, illumination kits,
    keyboards, mice, CPU water coolers, mouse pads, keyboard wrist rests,
    drive bay adapters, cables, headsets, case fans, chairs, desks,
    backpacks, and, oh yes, power supplies.

    Sharkoon rebrands PSUs from FSP and Enermax, but their QP and WPM series
    are from Channel Well (same OEM for Corsair CX series), and their Rush
    series are made by Enhance. Unless you open the PSU case, you really
    don't know whose PSU you get from Sharkoon.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/power-supply-oem-manufacturer,2913-9.html

    A decade old article, but gives you an idea that brands are not always
    the manufacturers (OEMs). This article is old, and purchasing agents at rebranders often change who are their OEMs.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-psus,4229.html

    An example of someone reviewing PSUs to determine quality. In fact, I remember reading articles there where they test PSUs, like to determine
    if they can actually meet their rated specs, under sustained loads at
    specs rather then transient loads, what happens to the PSUs under
    testing (some burn up at rated specs), ripple voltage, and more.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/how-we-test-psu,4042.html https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/power-supplies-101,4193.html

    You already bought the Sharkoon PSU. Hopefully whomever is the actual OEM/mfr is a good one for whatever you get. Sometimes you can see who
    is the OEM by looking inside the PSU case, but often the rebrander slaps their sticker atop the OEMs mark.


    The only ones I've had failures on, were the CWT (ChannelWell).

    They have the usual spread, the low end is likely iffy, their
    high end is better.

    But after my experience, I'd really rather have someone else make the supply.

    FSP (Fortron Sparkle), one of their characteristics, is the cable
    length is "just barely enough". That's how you could tell one
    of their OEMed units. I have one unit here branded "Sparkle"
    and that might be FSP. The other thing about FSP, is their crossloading
    spec, goes right out to the ATX spec max. They seemed to take
    pride in doing that.

    For a cheap one then, based on my failures here, I'd just want to
    check whether they were ChannelWell or not. The FSP will be OK.
    Enhance have made good stuff. Enermax, I've used a couple of those
    for years (more than ten years).

    We don't know who makes the $20 units. Those have all the protection
    circuitry removed, and also the supply has no certifications (no TUV).
    If such a supply has a 500W rating, then testing will show the
    supply is actually a 350W unit. Attempts to draw 500W don't end well
    in such a case. As a result, as long as you have some idea how
    kit like that behaves, then go ahead, spend $20 on one :-)

    Paul

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 1 05:22:34 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

    We don't know who makes the $20 units. Those have all the protection circuitry removed, and also the supply has no certifications (no TUV).
    If such a supply has a 500W rating, then testing will show the
    supply is actually a 350W unit. Attempts to draw 500W don't end well
    in such a case. As a result, as long as you have some idea how
    kit like that behaves, then go ahead, spend $20 on one :-)

    Or load it only to 70%, or even less, of its rated loads figuring they
    bloated their ratings, especially regarding sustained loads. Don't know
    for sure which OEM is inside the PSU the OP got branded Sharkoon. He
    had a 350W PSU before, so me might not need more. 70% of the 500W
    rating for Sharkoon puts it at 350W recommended which is close to the
    380W rating for his old Antec PSU.

    I don't recall spending less than $80 on a PSU. Typically I'm well over
    $100. While I try to stay with FSP/Fortron/Sparkle and Enermax (and the rebranders that use those as OEMs), and Corsair is generally okay as a rebrander, I stay away from the low-end models even with the good OEMs
    and rebranders. I did once buy a $50 Corsair on sale ($85 list). That
    went into my prior build before I gave it to a family member 11 years
    ago to replace a 6-yr old Dynapower (acquired by Sensata Tech in 2022
    for $580M, but I haven't bothered to look into Sensata). Dynapower was
    not a good PSU OEM except for some models, so I researched the model to
    find it had positive reviews (by tech sites, not so much for user
    reviews since those are often too flaky and non-technical). Even some
    Corsairs aren't great. I stay away from the bargain PSUs models. I try
    to build for an 8+ year lifespan, or longer, for my builds.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 1 09:40:45 2024
    On Sat, 11/30/2024 11:16 AM, s|b wrote:
    On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 09:15:48 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    FYI, Sharkoon doesn't manufacture anything. They stick their brand on
    products made by others. So does Corsair.

    I've had good experiences with Corsair.

    You already bought the Sharkoon PSU. Hopefully whomever is the actual
    OEM/mfr is a good one for whatever you get. Sometimes you can see who
    is the OEM by looking inside the PSU case, but often the rebrander slaps
    their sticker atop the OEMs mark.

    I don't want to be rude, but I just wanted a cheap PSU and I got one.
    It's not much, but the 2 reviews it has are both 5 stars. Also, I'm in Europe, so there's a minimum warranty of 2 years.


    It's a good idea, to try to track down who actually made it.

    Of the survivors in the industry, I'd only be concerned if
    it was a low-end ChannelWell CWT (based on my failures here).
    I notice they have stopped putting "CWT" on the transformer inside.

    No, don't open it up and look, as there may be a warranty-void
    sticker over one of the screws that hold the cover on. You'll
    have to keep the lid on the thing, until the warranty is expired
    on it.

    I prefer that power supplies keep the fan running, at low RPM.
    Some supply designs, the fan only comes on at 50C. And that's
    not a particularly clever thing to do. The caps have their
    best lives... at room temperature. Not at 50C.

    It's unlikely to be a PowMax-style "500W" one, so you
    don't need to worry about that. I don't think the $20 PSU
    makers, know how to build a double-forward conversion one :-)

    Paul

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Dec 2 01:26:39 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 09:15:48 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    FYI, Sharkoon doesn't manufacture anything. They stick their brand on
    products made by others. So does Corsair.

    I've had good experiences with Corsair.

    You already bought the Sharkoon PSU. Hopefully whomever is the actual
    OEM/mfr is a good one for whatever you get. Sometimes you can see who
    is the OEM by looking inside the PSU case, but often the rebrander slaps
    their sticker atop the OEMs mark.

    I don't want to be rude, but I just wanted a cheap PSU and I got one.
    It's not much, but the 2 reviews it has are both 5 stars. Also, I'm in Europe, so there's a minimum warranty of 2 years.

    Wow, all of 2 reviews. Were they by technically expertise sites
    reviewing PSUs? Or just some users reporting in less than a month that
    what they got worked at that time in a hardware configuration they never stated? An example of a more technical review is shown at:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USXefeaz4vM

    At full load rating, 12V was just under the ATX spec. At 110% load, the
    PSU failed on 12V to meet the ATX spec. Unfortunately many PSUs are not overbuilt. This reviewer didn't do sustained load testing to ensure the
    PSU didn't burn up.

    At 45 euro, you really think the warranty means anything? It'll cost
    you that, and probably a lot more, to ship the PSU back to Sparkoon,
    plus the downtime.

    80 Plus Bronze is not a great spec for a PSU. OEMs are allowed to skew
    the testing by letting them hand pick which units to test, and the spec
    omits several key tests.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRpqGF2poJM

    The less efficient the PSU, the more it has to dissipate for the same
    load as a more efficient PSU. Of course, with more efficiency comes a
    higher price tag. A hot PSU won't last as long.

    Along with lower efficiency, and not knowing who really made (the OEM)
    of the Sharkoon-branded PSU, is why I suggested running at a max load of
    70% of the ratings on the sticker on the PSU case.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/news/what-80-plus-levels-mean,36721.html

    Not saying what you bought is bad nor saying it is great. With a
    "Sharkoon" sticker on the inside, you don't know which OEM is inside.
    You may not need to dismantle the PSU to check the OEM. Use a
    flashlight to peek through the fan and venting grills. I could've
    missed it at their web site, but didn't find anything there noting the
    terms of their warranties. I did find:

    https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51OXHqTrbBS.pdf

    With Sharkoon promoting themselves as a gamer's brand, the PSU you got
    might be okay, but 80 Plus Bronze is at the bottom of that spec.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Dec 2 05:23:19 2024
    On Sun, 12/1/2024 9:26 AM, VanguardLH wrote:
    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 09:15:48 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    FYI, Sharkoon doesn't manufacture anything. They stick their brand on
    products made by others. So does Corsair.

    I've had good experiences with Corsair.

    You already bought the Sharkoon PSU. Hopefully whomever is the actual
    OEM/mfr is a good one for whatever you get. Sometimes you can see who
    is the OEM by looking inside the PSU case, but often the rebrander slaps >>> their sticker atop the OEMs mark.

    I don't want to be rude, but I just wanted a cheap PSU and I got one.
    It's not much, but the 2 reviews it has are both 5 stars. Also, I'm in
    Europe, so there's a minimum warranty of 2 years.

    Wow, all of 2 reviews. Were they by technically expertise sites
    reviewing PSUs? Or just some users reporting in less than a month that
    what they got worked at that time in a hardware configuration they never stated? An example of a more technical review is shown at:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USXefeaz4vM

    At full load rating, 12V was just under the ATX spec. At 110% load, the
    PSU failed on 12V to meet the ATX spec. Unfortunately many PSUs are not overbuilt. This reviewer didn't do sustained load testing to ensure the
    PSU didn't burn up.

    At 45 euro, you really think the warranty means anything? It'll cost
    you that, and probably a lot more, to ship the PSU back to Sparkoon,
    plus the downtime.

    80 Plus Bronze is not a great spec for a PSU. OEMs are allowed to skew
    the testing by letting them hand pick which units to test, and the spec
    omits several key tests.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRpqGF2poJM

    The less efficient the PSU, the more it has to dissipate for the same
    load as a more efficient PSU. Of course, with more efficiency comes a
    higher price tag. A hot PSU won't last as long.

    Along with lower efficiency, and not knowing who really made (the OEM)
    of the Sharkoon-branded PSU, is why I suggested running at a max load of
    70% of the ratings on the sticker on the PSU case.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/news/what-80-plus-levels-mean,36721.html

    Not saying what you bought is bad nor saying it is great. With a
    "Sharkoon" sticker on the inside, you don't know which OEM is inside.
    You may not need to dismantle the PSU to check the OEM. Use a
    flashlight to peek through the fan and venting grills. I could've
    missed it at their web site, but didn't find anything there noting the
    terms of their warranties. I did find:

    https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51OXHqTrbBS.pdf

    With Sharkoon promoting themselves as a gamer's brand, the PSU you got
    might be okay, but 80 Plus Bronze is at the bottom of that spec.


    Bronze is good enough. It doesn't have to be Gold.

    The supplies have come a long way, in terms of thermals.
    The old ones could be 60% to 70% efficient, and the heat
    was just pouring out of them.

    The machine across the way, I can't feel any heat coming out
    of the PSU when it is doing a backup file compression run.
    And that's a bit over 200W of wall power (measured on a
    Kill-O-Watt meter).

    My daily driver is using a Seasonic Bronze and there isn't usually
    a heavy electrical load on that, and that's cool exhaust air
    (and almost zero airflow at the moment). Power is 33 watts of wall
    power at the moment.

    Whereas you remember what the Pentium 4 era was like. The
    airflow was higher. The temperature difference was palpable
    and a sign of wasted power.

    Any 80+ is better than a kick in the head, no matter
    whether bronze, gold, platinum.

    If you were gaming, and you had a RTX4090 and a 4K screen,
    I'm pretty sure you'd feel a bit of heat on the PSU then.
    My latest PSU, I don't know if it's even got enough
    fan speed, to run at full load. The fan is that weak and sad.

    If the power supply fan is too slow for your liking, you can
    always keep the computer case pressurized so air will be forced
    through it. That's what I've been trying to do on the machine
    across the way, is use the case fans to keep the PSU situation
    in check (make sure caps are kept cool in it).

    Paul


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Dec 2 21:40:57 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Sun, 1 Dec 2024 08:26:39 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    At 45 euro, you really think the warranty means anything? It'll cost
    you that, and probably a lot more, to ship the PSU back to Sparkoon,
    plus the downtime.

    It'll cost me nothing and I'll either get a replacement or my money
    back. I won't have to send anything to Sparkoon; that's the (Belgian)
    shop's responsibility. I don't know how it works where you're at, but
    that is how it's done over here.

    80 Plus Bronze is not a great spec for a PSU. OEMs are allowed to skew
    the testing by letting them hand pick which units to test, and the spec
    omits several key tests.

    The original PSU is 80 Plus Bronze as well. It worked without a problem
    for /years/. Yes, it broke down eventually, but not while I was using
    it. I left it unused in a cold room for years.

    With Sharkoon promoting themselves as a gamer's brand, the PSU you got
    might be okay, but 80 Plus Bronze is at the bottom of that spec.

    I asked for a cheap PSU and I got it. The main reason is that I want to
    try out Linux and maybe rip some audio CD's since my main PC hasn't got
    a CD/DVD writer, but the old one has. The main PC has the PSU at the
    bottom and room for one writer at the top. Everything is wrapped away
    nice and tidy. It'll be a PITA to install the writer in there; it's
    easier to use the old PC. I have room to place 2 PCs next to each other
    or I can use VNC or NoMachine.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Dec 2 21:43:50 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 17:40:45 -0500, Paul wrote:

    It's a good idea, to try to track down who actually made it.

    You guys are on a whole other level than me.

    I prefer that power supplies keep the fan running, at low RPM.
    Some supply designs, the fan only comes on at 50C. And that's
    not a particularly clever thing to do. The caps have their
    best lives... at room temperature. Not at 50C.

    Ah, I though every PSU runs all the time.

    It's unlikely to be a PowMax-style "500W" one, so you
    don't need to worry about that. I don't think the $20 PSU
    makers, know how to build a double-forward conversion one :-)

    (-:

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Dec 3 07:06:33 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    On Sun, 1 Dec 2024 08:26:39 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    At 45 euro, you really think the warranty means anything? It'll cost
    you that, and probably a lot more, to ship the PSU back to Sparkoon,
    plus the downtime.

    It'll cost me nothing and I'll either get a replacement or my money
    back. I won't have to send anything to Sparkoon; that's the (Belgian)
    shop's responsibility. I don't know how it works where you're at, but
    that is how it's done over here.

    Different in the USA regarding contract law. The warranty is between
    maker and consumer, not the shop. The shop may have its own return
    policy, like give a month to return and refund a defective product, but
    odd they should be honoring the warranty for 2 years. Nice shop there.

    80 Plus Bronze is not a great spec for a PSU. OEMs are allowed to skew
    the testing by letting them hand pick which units to test, and the spec
    omits several key tests.

    The original PSU is 80 Plus Bronze as well. It worked without a problem
    for /years/. Yes, it broke down eventually, but not while I was using
    it. I left it unused in a cold room for years.

    Doubt it was storage that broke the PSU, but critters could've gotten
    inside. Mice chew on everything.

    My point is the lower the efficiency, the more heat produced in the PSU
    for the same load. Heat and electronics are enemies.

    With Sharkoon promoting themselves as a gamer's brand, the PSU you got
    might be okay, but 80 Plus Bronze is at the bottom of that spec.

    I asked for a cheap PSU and I got it. The main reason is that I want to
    try out Linux and maybe rip some audio CD's since my main PC hasn't got
    a CD/DVD writer, but the old one has. The main PC has the PSU at the
    bottom and room for one writer at the top.

    Likely the PSU draws outside air up from the bottom of the case, and
    expels its heated air outside to the back. That eliminates the PSU
    heating up the interior of the case. Presumably the back of the case
    should be away from a wall or other obstruction to prevent the heated
    exhaust from the PSU from circling around to the intake of the PSU. My
    next build will be that way.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Dec 3 07:15:02 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 17:40:45 -0500, Paul wrote:

    I prefer that power supplies keep the fan running, at low RPM.
    Some supply designs, the fan only comes on at 50C. And that's
    not a particularly clever thing to do. The caps have their
    best lives... at room temperature. Not at 50C.

    Ah, I though every PSU runs all the time.

    They vary, like chili at different restaurants.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Dec 3 07:19:16 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:15:02 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    Ah, I though every PSU runs all the time.

    They vary, like chili at different restaurants.

    h†h† (-:

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Dec 3 07:30:55 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:06:33 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    Different in the USA regarding contract law. The warranty is between
    maker and consumer, not the shop. The shop may have its own return
    policy, like give a month to return and refund a defective product, but
    odd they should be honoring the warranty for 2 years. Nice shop there.

    The 30 days return policy is also in effect. But in case of warranty
    they should offer at least 2 years; it's a EU rule. Sony however, got an exception because there's only 1 year warranty on their controllers
    (still 2 years for the console).

    Doubt it was storage that broke the PSU, but critters could've gotten
    inside. Mice chew on everything.

    I might have accidentally kicked it (not much room in there :-).

    My point is the lower the efficiency, the more heat produced in the PSU
    for the same load. Heat and electronics are enemies.

    I'm hoping the fan will do its part.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Thu Dec 5 03:41:02 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:19:46 +0100, s|b wrote:

    I've got a computer I haven't used for some time. I took out a hdd (D:)
    and left it alone. I'm trying to get it to work again, but it just dies
    on me.

    Today I installed the new PSU and everything is working fine, even the
    SATA hdd that was giving me problems in my SATA HDD/SSD USB docking
    station.

    Not only that, I also learned some new things. So thanks again Paul and VanguardLH!

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Thu Dec 5 07:14:07 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:19:46 +0100, s|b wrote:

    I've got a computer I haven't used for some time. I took out a hdd (D:)
    and left it alone. I'm trying to get it to work again, but it just dies
    on me.

    Today I installed the new PSU and everything is working fine, even the
    SATA hdd that was giving me problems in my SATA HDD/SSD USB docking
    station.

    Not only that, I also learned some new things. So thanks again Paul and VanguardLH!

    Since you replaced the CPU's thermal paste, you should probably employ a temperature monitor to watch the CPU temperature for a while.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/how-to/how-to-check-cpu-temp-temperature

    Mentions AIDA64, but I thought that got abandoned. Just looked at:

    https://www.aida64.com/online-store

    Okay, so it became payware, and why I stopped using it. It's free, but requires payment to "unlock the full potential". Maybe they crippled
    the full version back when I was using it to then paywall the advanced features, and why I stopped using it. It was all free, and then
    crippled so only some of it was free. There were other free choices.

    CoreTemp shows you temps when you manually instigate investigation. It
    doesn't remain resident to issue alerts when temps get too high. Be
    careful during installation, though, as I've read it defaults to
    installing bloatware. Deselect some checkboxes during installation.

    I did use Speedfan on an old build. Primarily because there was a fault
    on the mobo that prevented the BIOS controlling speed fans, so I used
    Speedfan which worked, anyway. When booted, the CPU and case fans ran
    at full speed which made more noise, but that lasted only until Speedfan
    got loaded after Windows startup. It had temperature monitoring, too,
    but I don't recall if it alerted you to overly high temps. It wasn't
    needed in my next and current build (c.2019).

    There is CPU-Z, but doesn't show temperatures. However, the same author
    has HWMonitor (https://www.cpuid.com/softwares/hwmonitor.html). Because
    I have CPU-Z installed, I also have HWMonitor installed. Takes a while
    to load. It will report current temperatures, but not log a history of temperatures to see both present and past readings.

    I've never used Open Hardware Monitor (https://openhardwaremonitor.org/)
    but it looks similar to HWMonitor.

    Pirform's Speccy also reports temps. Piriform was acquired by Avast who immediately turned Piriform's CCleaner into spamware, but firewall rules
    can neuter it. Doesn't look like Avast spammified the other Piriform
    products.

    After a new build or change, I'll monitor temps for awhile. So, having
    to manually check periodically is okay instead of having something
    always running that keeps a history of temperature readings (which I'd
    still have to manually go check). Something that logs a history of temp readings along with alerting on overtemps would be preferable.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Thu Dec 5 10:28:50 2024
    On Wed, 12/4/2024 3:14 PM, VanguardLH wrote:
    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:19:46 +0100, s|b wrote:

    I've got a computer I haven't used for some time. I took out a hdd (D:)
    and left it alone. I'm trying to get it to work again, but it just dies
    on me.

    Today I installed the new PSU and everything is working fine, even the
    SATA hdd that was giving me problems in my SATA HDD/SSD USB docking
    station.

    Not only that, I also learned some new things. So thanks again Paul and
    VanguardLH!

    Since you replaced the CPU's thermal paste, you should probably employ a temperature monitor to watch the CPU temperature for a while.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/how-to/how-to-check-cpu-temp-temperature

    Mentions AIDA64, but I thought that got abandoned. Just looked at:

    https://www.aida64.com/online-store

    Okay, so it became payware, and why I stopped using it. It's free, but requires payment to "unlock the full potential". Maybe they crippled
    the full version back when I was using it to then paywall the advanced features, and why I stopped using it. It was all free, and then
    crippled so only some of it was free. There were other free choices.

    CoreTemp shows you temps when you manually instigate investigation. It doesn't remain resident to issue alerts when temps get too high. Be
    careful during installation, though, as I've read it defaults to
    installing bloatware. Deselect some checkboxes during installation.

    I did use Speedfan on an old build. Primarily because there was a fault
    on the mobo that prevented the BIOS controlling speed fans, so I used Speedfan which worked, anyway. When booted, the CPU and case fans ran
    at full speed which made more noise, but that lasted only until Speedfan
    got loaded after Windows startup. It had temperature monitoring, too,
    but I don't recall if it alerted you to overly high temps. It wasn't
    needed in my next and current build (c.2019).

    There is CPU-Z, but doesn't show temperatures. However, the same author
    has HWMonitor (https://www.cpuid.com/softwares/hwmonitor.html). Because
    I have CPU-Z installed, I also have HWMonitor installed. Takes a while
    to load. It will report current temperatures, but not log a history of temperatures to see both present and past readings.

    I've never used Open Hardware Monitor (https://openhardwaremonitor.org/)
    but it looks similar to HWMonitor.

    Pirform's Speccy also reports temps. Piriform was acquired by Avast who immediately turned Piriform's CCleaner into spamware, but firewall rules
    can neuter it. Doesn't look like Avast spammified the other Piriform products.

    After a new build or change, I'll monitor temps for awhile. So, having
    to manually check periodically is okay instead of having something
    always running that keeps a history of temperature readings (which I'd
    still have to manually go check). Something that logs a history of temp readings along with alerting on overtemps would be preferable.


    CPU-Z, you can go to the About tab, and there is an option to Save as Text.

    Open the file, which is MachineName.txt , and have a look.

    For well known methods (CoreTemp on Intel, Infinite Fabric on AMD),
    those methods can be used to report the current temperature when the report
    was saved.

    This is not a "convenient method", but it is a method, and it
    is useful when no other method has a driver for the Hardware Monitor
    or whatever.

    https://www.cpuid.com/softwares/cpu-z.html

    Classic Versions

    ZIP * English <=== The ZIP is a Portable version

    Paul

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Dec 6 02:30:09 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

    On Wed, 12/4/2024 3:14 PM, VanguardLH wrote:

    After a new build or change, I'll monitor temps for awhile. So,
    having to manually check periodically is okay instead of having
    something always running that keeps a history of temperature
    readings (which I'd still have to manually go check). Something
    that logs a history of temp readings along with alerting on
    overtemps would be preferable.

    CPU-Z, you can go to the About tab, and there is an option to Save as
    Text.

    Open the file, which is MachineName.txt , and have a look.

    But *I* would have to keep repeatedly saving the current statistics, and
    into different log files to merge together to get a history of
    temperatures. No thanks. That's like me standing somewhere taking
    repeated pics of some scene to create a slide show rather than plant a
    camera on a tripod that is scheduled to automatically take pics of the
    same spot. I'd rather have software do the chore than me doing the
    mundane task.

    I know I've seen a program that retained a history of temperatures. I
    use HD Sentinel which includes monitoring temps of drives, and it has a history. But not of the CPU, GPU, or memory modules.

    This is not a "convenient method", but it is a method, and it
    is useful when no other method has a driver for the Hardware Monitor
    or whatever.

    Pretty much dictates that after booting into the OS that I would be
    preoccupied with repeatedly saving to a log what are the current
    readings.

    I mentioned using SpeedFan (https://www.almico.com/speedfan.php)
    primarily to control CPU and case fan speeds (on a defective mobo).
    SpeedFan does have an option to log history into a file. It's been 5
    years, or more, since I last used SpeedFan, so I forgot it had the
    logging feature. Main window -> Configure -> Log tab, select Enabled
    checkbox, Temperatures tab, select the temp you want to log, and select
    the Logged checkbox. I don't have it installed to check if that navpath
    is still correct. As I recall, I remember using temp and fan speed
    history in Speedfan shown as a chart to determine what happened when I
    played a game, or for some other event in which I was curious how it
    might affect temps and speeds, and how fast those would accelerate or decelerate after the event.

    From a 7-year old forum post, someone said Open Hardware Monitor (https://openhardwaremonitor.org/) has Options -> Log Sensors that will automatically save all sensor data as a function of time at an interval
    you select into a dated file into the same folder as where is the
    executable for the program. Could run afoul of Windows 7+ protection
    keeping programs and program data in separate paths, so you might have
    to run OHM in a folder other than under C:\Program Files [(x86)].

    So, some temp monitors can log a history of temps. I'm sure there are
    more than those I mentioned.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Dec 6 03:11:10 2024
    On Thu, 12/5/2024 10:30 AM, VanguardLH wrote:
    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

    On Wed, 12/4/2024 3:14 PM, VanguardLH wrote:

    After a new build or change, I'll monitor temps for awhile. So,
    having to manually check periodically is okay instead of having
    something always running that keeps a history of temperature
    readings (which I'd still have to manually go check). Something
    that logs a history of temp readings along with alerting on
    overtemps would be preferable.

    CPU-Z, you can go to the About tab, and there is an option to Save as
    Text.

    Open the file, which is MachineName.txt , and have a look.

    But *I* would have to keep repeatedly saving the current statistics, and
    into different log files to merge together to get a history of
    temperatures. No thanks. That's like me standing somewhere taking
    repeated pics of some scene to create a slide show rather than plant a
    camera on a tripod that is scheduled to automatically take pics of the
    same spot. I'd rather have software do the chore than me doing the
    mundane task.

    I know I've seen a program that retained a history of temperatures. I
    use HD Sentinel which includes monitoring temps of drives, and it has a history. But not of the CPU, GPU, or memory modules.

    This is not a "convenient method", but it is a method, and it
    is useful when no other method has a driver for the Hardware Monitor
    or whatever.

    Pretty much dictates that after booting into the OS that I would be preoccupied with repeatedly saving to a log what are the current
    readings.

    I mentioned using SpeedFan (https://www.almico.com/speedfan.php)
    primarily to control CPU and case fan speeds (on a defective mobo).
    SpeedFan does have an option to log history into a file. It's been 5
    years, or more, since I last used SpeedFan, so I forgot it had the
    logging feature. Main window -> Configure -> Log tab, select Enabled checkbox, Temperatures tab, select the temp you want to log, and select
    the Logged checkbox. I don't have it installed to check if that navpath
    is still correct. As I recall, I remember using temp and fan speed
    history in Speedfan shown as a chart to determine what happened when I
    played a game, or for some other event in which I was curious how it
    might affect temps and speeds, and how fast those would accelerate or decelerate after the event.

    From a 7-year old forum post, someone said Open Hardware Monitor (https://openhardwaremonitor.org/) has Options -> Log Sensors that will automatically save all sensor data as a function of time at an interval
    you select into a dated file into the same folder as where is the
    executable for the program. Could run afoul of Windows 7+ protection
    keeping programs and program data in separate paths, so you might have
    to run OHM in a folder other than under C:\Program Files [(x86)].

    So, some temp monitors can log a history of temps. I'm sure there are
    more than those I mentioned.


    I'm sure you're aware at the moment, that Microsoft has a hate-on for "drivers", such as the driver that Speedfan uses. Similarly,
    I had installed some copy of Asus AISuite (which includes hardware
    monitor info), and the driver for that is blacklisted. A notification
    will appear on your screen, telling you to remove it. Any driver
    of the "exploit-able" type, is getting this treatment.

    The developers knew long ago, that this would be an issue.
    At one time, it might have been "giveio.sys", which was used
    to break through the admin-only protection on access to
    hardware. Well, that kind of thing has caught up to us,
    and various things are either getting damaged or they're
    getting blacklisted.

    This is why, it's fine to quote historical references to all
    the tools we used to use. but nobody is keeping track
    of the tools that raise a "nasty-gram" on the user screen.
    I can't keep track of all these. But I *have* been surprised,
    when software I installed, then removed, left a bloody driver
    behind (the exploit type), and NOW Microsoft is pointing
    these things out to me. At first I'm incredulous - "where
    did this come from?". Typically, the utility was installed
    in Windows 7, I did a W10-over-W7 install, and the file
    is *still* in the System32 folder in Win10. It was actually
    an artifact from windows 7 days.

    This means, if I happen to test something in the last ten
    minutes, and the OS doesn't find fault with it... I'm likely
    to create a reference to it in a posting. I can't be sure
    what the disposition of Speedfan is. Speedfan development
    stopped. The new SuperIO and their hardware monitor section,
    there's no code in Speedfan for them. There is none in Linux
    for my new motherboards either. And also, some of
    the ACPI objects don't have the right name, so even if
    a utility can figure out something is there, there is
    nothing that says "item number five is the motherboard temperature".
    I have a few items in the hardware monitor, which appear to be
    "bogus", but I can't really be sure they're not inputs.

    So really, the computer is now just as bad as it was in MBM5 days.
    It's degraded to that point. In MBM5 days, each motherboard
    was custom developed, users would provide raw readings, the
    dev would work up a prototype, the user would feed back
    whether the readings made sense. And so on. That was
    before some of these items had info added to ACPI, to
    bypass the "giveio.sys" issue.

    It's just a constant mess. Only individual humans have
    allowed us to make forward progress. When they disappear,
    we fall back into the soup of ignorance.

    Paul

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 7 03:43:30 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 14:14:07 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    CoreTemp shows you temps when you manually instigate investigation. It doesn't remain resident to issue alerts when temps get too high. Be
    careful during installation, though, as I've read it defaults to
    installing bloatware. Deselect some checkboxes during installation.

    That can't be right?

    <https://ibb.co/mvRw8Yn>

    (BIOS said something around 26øC.)

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 7 03:45:31 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Fri, 06 Dec 2024 17:43:30 +0100, s|b wrote:

    (BIOS said something around 26øC.)

    Rebooted and checked BIOS again: 33øC.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 7 09:46:59 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    On Fri, 06 Dec 2024 17:43:30 +0100, s|b wrote:

    (BIOS said something around 26øC.)

    Rebooted and checked BIOS again: 33øC.

    Speccy says the CPU is at 41C. I'm not doing much on my computer at the
    moment other than visiting Usenet. To me, that is a tad high, but it's
    been over a year since I blew out all the dust inside the case,
    especially the HSFs for the CPU and GPU, and dust is a thermal insulator
    (slows transfer of heat).

    If you were to run Prime95 for a while, the CPU would go way up in temp.
    you'll probably run up closer to 80C at which point the CPU may throttle
    itself (gets slower) to protect itself.

    Your mobo has an FM1 socket for the CPU. Don't know which AMD CPU is in
    your socket, but likely it has an operating temperature range up to 95C.

    https://www.cpu-world.com/Sockets/Socket%20FM1.html

    You could find out what CPU you have, and then lookup its specifications
    to determine your CPU's operating temperature range. You have a
    micro-ATX mobo with a 380W PSU. It wasn't designed for heavy computing,
    but for general desktop use for office use (aka mid-range use).

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/5432/asus-f1a75m-pro-review-microatx-llano-at-110
    (use the drop-down chevron to select other pages in the article)

    There is a section in that article that shows what CPU temps those folks
    found with that mobo and CPU.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 7 12:43:14 2024
    On Fri, 12/6/2024 11:43 AM, s|b wrote:
    On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 14:14:07 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    CoreTemp shows you temps when you manually instigate investigation. It
    doesn't remain resident to issue alerts when temps get too high. Be
    careful during installation, though, as I've read it defaults to
    installing bloatware. Deselect some checkboxes during installation.

    That can't be right?

    <https://ibb.co/mvRw8Yn>

    (BIOS said something around 26øC.)


    The developer claims to have made a fix for the 4C thing in the year 2012.

    https://www.alcpu.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2297

    In this CPU-Z for your processor, you can see that at idle,
    and with a decent heatsink, the CPU can pull a low temperature
    reading (29.3C) at idle.

    http://valid.x86.fr/p8hcd8

    At best, a temperature reading shouldn't even bother with digits
    after the decimal. The uncertainty is from +/- 1C to +/- 10C,
    depending on measurement method. The best method is the
    "two current method", which involved two constant current
    sources alternately switched into the measurement circuit.
    This allows correcting for some offset term in one of
    the sensor types. While this technical detail is known,
    no hardware seems to be designed to do it that way.

    Measurement methodology could also be calibrated for each
    hardware instance, but nobody does that in a comprehensive way.
    If there is a calibration done, it is a single data point,
    and does not have sufficient information for a polynomial
    best fit. Nobody takes, like, 10 readings while the silicon
    die is in the test head at the fab, and records those in
    some flash cells.

    The purpose of temperature readings is mostly do determine
    when there is grossly insufficient cooling. It's not an
    attempt to make a weather station out of the PC hardware :-)
    This is why, on an Intel CPU at idle, you can get a 15C
    core reading, when the room is 23C. The reading could even
    be 13C, and that is within the known behavior of those
    circuits. The AMD measurement does not have the "high bias"
    effect, like on Intel. On Intel, the measurement is
    very accurate at 90C (1C uncertainty), and poor at room
    temp where it does not matter (10C uncertainty).

    *******

    I still think, for contrast, you should run a CPU-Z and
    click the About tab, and save a report. On my modern AMD,
    I get a ton of temperature measurements (from the Infinity
    Fabric), and these are not normally displayed in other
    software. On AMD Ryzen Master, only the "die temperature"
    (which is also in CPU-Z) is displayed, and they do not
    bother showing individual core temperatures, as that
    would be information overload.

    My processor that I'm typing on, routinely has low
    temperatures just above ambient at idle. And if you look at
    the PWM controlled cooling fan on the CPU, the
    cooling control also thinks the CPU is cool, as the
    revolutions per minute is very low (maybe 400 RPM right now).
    The CPU is basically running on one core, the min clock
    is maybe 500MHz, and the CPU might be running at 800MHz
    or so.

    Like Van says, a load test will indicate how good your
    cooling is. Even CPU-Z, in the Bench tab, it has a
    Stress Test button, for leaving the benchmark running
    and warming up the CPU. That raises my CPU to 60C die
    temperature, and that is sufficiently below 90C for
    me to be happy about it.

    Paul

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: To protect and to server (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 8 00:11:35 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 16:46:59 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    If you were to run Prime95 for a while, the CPU would go way up in temp. you'll probably run up closer to 80C at which point the CPU may throttle itself (gets slower) to protect itself.

    I ran Prime95 for an hour. Highest temperature (according to CoreTemp)
    was 48øC.

    Your mobo has an FM1 socket for the CPU. Don't know which AMD CPU is in
    your socket, but likely it has an operating temperature range up to 95C.

    Paul's got a better memory than you; I mentioned the CPU. ;-)

    AMD A8-3870 APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 8 01:27:04 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 20:43:14 -0500, Paul wrote:

    The developer claims to have made a fix for the 4C thing in the year 2012.

    https://www.alcpu.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2297

    I've got the latest version and it's still showing those low
    temperatures.

    In this CPU-Z for your processor, you can see that at idle,
    and with a decent heatsink, the CPU can pull a low temperature
    reading (29.3C) at idle.

    http://valid.x86.fr/p8hcd8

    Seems to be right.

    Like Van says, a load test will indicate how good your
    cooling is. Even CPU-Z, in the Bench tab, it has a
    Stress Test button, for leaving the benchmark running
    and warming up the CPU. That raises my CPU to 60C die
    temperature, and that is sufficiently below 90C for
    me to be happy about it.

    Mine peaked at 48øC after half an hour of Prime95.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 8 02:46:55 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    VanguardLH wrote:

    If you were to run Prime95 for a while, the CPU would go way up in
    temp. you'll probably run up closer to 80C at which point the CPU
    may throttle itself (gets slower) to protect itself.

    I ran Prime95 for an hour. Highest temperature (according to
    CoreTemp) was 48øC.

    Your mobo has an FM1 socket for the CPU. Don't know which AMD CPU is
    in your socket, but likely it has an operating temperature range up
    to 95C.

    Paul's got a better memory than you; I mentioned the CPU. ;-)

    I wasn't in that subthread, so nothing for me to recall from my memory.
    Way too mentions of "cpu" to bother hunting through all the articles in
    this discussion.

    AMD A8-3870 APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics

    https://forums.tomshardware.com/faq/an-understanding-of-temperature-on-amd-cpus-and-apus.1795730/

    Apparently you can read the thermal margin which is the difference
    between the current CPU temperature and the maximum operating
    temperature.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20140713034657/https://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K10/AMD-A8-Series%20A8-3870%20AD3870WNZ43GX.html

    Maximum temperature: 72.7C

    With a temp monitor with threshold alerts and a history log, I'd set the
    alert to 60C. Then, if alerted, check the log to see how often you came
    close or exceeded that temperature. 60C still has wiggle room.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 8 03:02:56 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Sat, 7 Dec 2024 09:46:55 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    With a temp monitor with threshold alerts and a history log, I'd set the alert to 60C. Then, if alerted, check the log to see how often you came close or exceeded that temperature. 60C still has wiggle room.

    In the BIOS? I just installed RealVNC and threw the monitor in another
    room. \-:

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 8 04:40:13 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    s|b <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:

    VanguardLH wrote:

    With a temp monitor with threshold alerts and a history log, I'd set the
    alert to 60C. Then, if alerted, check the log to see how often you came
    close or exceeded that temperature. 60C still has wiggle room.

    In the BIOS? I just installed RealVNC and threw the monitor in another
    room. \-:

    No, a temp monitor program that loads on Windows startup, or on Windows
    account login (i.e., a startup program). For VNC to work, you need a
    VNC server running on the remote host, and that loads on Windows startup
    and Windows account login. Then you could use a VNC client on the local
    host to look at a temp monitor program that also loads on Windows login
    on the remote host to use a VNC client on the local host to check the
    temp on the remote host.

    I doubt you'll be able to see the BIOS settings with VNC. That requires
    a VNC server and temp monitor be running on the remote host that you
    monitor, and those need to load on Windows startup on the remote host.
    After the POST screen, and you hit a key to go into BIOS, that is before
    any OS loads. You could use VNC client on the local host with a temp
    monitor program that loads on the remote host on startup, probably on
    login, since VNC client won't work until its VNC server on the remote
    host gets loaded which is a startup program, too.

    Remote host:
    - Booted into Windows.
    - Logged into a Windows account.
    - VNC server loads on startup (when logging in).
    - Temp monitor loads on startup (when logging in).

    Local host:
    - Boot into Windows.
    - Log into a Windows account.
    - Use VNC client to look at remote host.

    Although both local and remote hosts are probably inside your network, I
    would configure the VNC server to require password access, or restrict
    the IP address of the host connecting to the VNC server.

    RealVNC viewer (client) is free. RealVNC server is not.

    https://help.realvnc.com/hc/en-us/articles/360002249677-Licensing-RealVNC-Connect
    https://www.realvnc.com/en/connect/pricing/

    There is a RealVNC Lite that, I think, is free, but I don't recall if it includes the server which is needed on the remote host you monitor. The
    above pricing page doesn't show the Lite version in the comparison.

    https://www.realvnc.com/en/connect/plan/lite/

    I found folks mention the free plan got discontinued, like:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/1csq8bm/realvnc_is_sunsetting_their_free_plan_what/

    Yet the above RealVNC page still exists for the download. There are
    wholly free alternatives; e.g., TightVNC, TigerVNC (but its server is unmaintained as of 1.11.0), UltraVNC. Of course, VNC itself, but with
    less glitz.

    If your local and remote hosts are not in-network (i.e., you go across
    the Internet), TeamViewer (free) is probably a better choice. Instead
    of having someone at the remote host to allow the connect, you can run a TeamViewer server on the remote host. With VNC, and with an external
    connect coming to the remote host, you would need to punch a hole in
    your router's firewall by defining a port forwarding rule. You'd need
    to know the WAN-side IP address of your router/modem to know where to
    connect with your local host; however, you can use DDNS (Dynamic DNS)
    service to give your remote host an FQDN, so you could use an easily
    remembered hostname to the remote host instead of remembering an IP
    address (which, if dynamically assigned instead of static, means it
    could change). DDNS has you run a DDNS client on the remote host which
    reports the IP address to your DDNS account (which operates the DNS with
    a record pointing to your remote host). I don't think you need to do
    any firewall port rules, or bother with DDNS, when using TeamViewer.

    If your local and remote host are both in-network in your home, I don't
    much see the point of wasting time setting up VNC server and client.
    Just walk over to the other host.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From s|b@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Dec 10 01:54:39 2024
    Reply-To: sb.nospam@belgacom.net

    On Sat, 7 Dec 2024 11:40:13 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:

    In the BIOS? I just installed RealVNC and threw the monitor in another room. \-:

    No, a temp monitor program that loads on Windows startup, or on Windows account login (i.e., a startup program).

    By monitor I meant 'computer screen'.

    For VNC to work, you need a
    VNC server running on the remote host, and that loads on Windows startup
    and Windows account login. Then you could use a VNC client on the local
    host to look at a temp monitor program that also loads on Windows login
    on the remote host to use a VNC client on the local host to check the
    temp on the remote host.

    I know that. For family members I've used UltraVNC and TeamViewer, but
    since I'm already using RealVNC for my RPi I am now using that.

    RealVNC viewer (client) is free. RealVNC server is not.

    RealVNC Lite is free for 3 devices.

    I found folks mention the free plan got discontinued, like:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/1csq8bm/realvnc_is_sunsetting_their_free_plan_what/

    It's not, but you have to register first. For RPi it worked out of the
    box. I see they're mentioning NoMachine on Reddit, that was my second
    option.

    If your local and remote host are both in-network in your home, I don't
    much see the point of wasting time setting up VNC server and client.
    Just walk over to the other host.

    It must be fun to have all that room. ;-) I haven't, so RealVNC saves me
    an extra screen, keyboard and mouse and I've got 1 extra free power
    plug. OTOH it's a bit sluggish. Maybe I'll try NoMachine after all.

    --
    s|b

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: XXII (3:633/280.2@fidonet)