• Spam

    From Jim the Geordie@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Dec 13 22:22:09 2024
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.

    --
    Jim the Geordie


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: To protect and to server (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Graham J@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 14 00:38:45 2024
    Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.

    I would expect a spam blocker to reject things coming from a Gmail
    address. I think you should send from your own domain - possibly the
    one relating to your music group. And make sure that your domain has
    the necessary SPF and DKIM records visible so that your email will get
    through typical spam blockers. Don't send from an email address that is connected with your internet provider - so not Plusnet or whoever you use.

    I've used mailsend, see:

    <https://sourceforge.net/projects/mailsend.mirror/files/1.19/>

    This allows you to specify a list of recipient addresses and add an attachment.

    It's simpler than mailmerge but does require a little bit of familiarity
    with creating and running a batch file.

    This ensures that each message is sent separately, and there's nothing
    to show it comes from a bulk mailing function.


    --
    Graham J

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From D@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 14 00:39:07 2024
    On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 11:22:09 +0000, Jim the Geordie <jim@jimXscott.co.uk> wrote:
    Path: news..!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail
    From: Jim the Geordie <jim@jimXscott.co.uk>
    Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.software.thunderbird
    Subject: Spam
    Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 11:22:09 +0000
    Organization: To protect and to server
    Message-ID: <vjh5d2$1shv1$1@paganini.bofh.team>
    Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; ...

    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.
    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they >were classed as spam.
    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' >problem, and is there a way round it?
    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.
    --
    Jim the Geordie

    one of many familiar and very common troll-farm tactics is to re-word
    and re-post ad infinitum; also, deliberate misspellings, incorrigible unwillingness to learn, sockpuppet crowding/flooding, obfuscation etc.
    you see this same ceaseless drivel in every newsgroup... c'est la vie

    On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 12:28:49 +0100, Jim the Geordie <jim@jimXscott.co.uk> wrote:
    Path: news..!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail
    From: Jim the Geordie <jim@jimXscott.co.uk>
    Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10
    Subject: Gmail and batch posting? (may be OT)
    Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 12:28:49 +0100
    Organization: To protect and to server
    Message-ID: <vaf4hi$1a0bg$2@paganini.bofh.team>
    Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; ...

    I have a domain and a hosted website with email.
    It is a Wordpress Starter account, so I don't pay a lot.
    I am also the publicity guy for a music group and post a heads-up to
    about 200 members once a month. (in batches of between 50 and 80)
    addresses.
    Recently I have found that my hosts have been blocking my outward mail,
    they say, because the batches may be mistaken for commercial spam.
    I understand what they say, but I don't want to pay 3x as much for a VPS >service which I only really need once a month.
    The question:
    If I get a new Gmail address is there a limit to how many addresses I
    can post to at one time?
    --
    Jim the Geordie


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Carlos E.R.@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 14 00:51:10 2024
    On 2024-12-13 12:22, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.

    Some people tune the mail server to send the posts one at a time, slowly.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: ---:- FTN<->UseNet Gate -:--- (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 14 01:45:09 2024
    On 13.12.24 12:22, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.

    btinternet.com on blacklists (again)?

    https://mxtoolbox.com



    --
    "Gutta cavat lapidem." (Ovid)

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Camembert Normand au Lait Cru (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 14 01:47:20 2024
    On 13.12.24 15:45, J”rg Lorenz wrote:
    On 13.12.24 12:22, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known'
    problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.

    btinternet.com on blacklists (again)?

    https://mxtoolbox.com

    Gmail (Google) is spam by definition ...
    Use a more serious e-mail-address.

    --
    "Gutta cavat lapidem." (Ovid)

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Camembert Normand au Lait Cru (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Zaidy036@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 14 01:50:39 2024
    On 12/13/2024 6:22 AM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.

    all it takes is one or two users of that ISP to mark a message from you
    as spam. maybe someone wants to leave the group and to stop emails marks
    as spam.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Bulk Emails@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 14 03:48:22 2024
    On 13/12/2024 13:38, Graham J wrote:


    I would expect a spam blocker to reject things coming from a Gmail
    address.

    Not really. spam filters would classify anything addressed as bcc. The
    letter b is for bulk and so it must be a spam!! according to spam filters.

    Rejection is not something happens. The email is entered in spam folder
    or bulk folder depending on the server. I suspect the customers might
    have configured to reject or delete all spam when arrive. The sender
    can't do anything about this except tp send them as cc but this is also
    a privacy issue.

    You are right to suggest a domain but the OP needs to have a server
    unless the registrar of the domain allows email for certain quota, which
    is unlikely. Running a server is not easy because it still requires
    somebody to allow relaying of the emails. His ISP perhaps or some free services such as Brevo (300 emails per day).


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: To protect and to server (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Zaidy036@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 14 04:00:13 2024
    On 12/13/2024 11:48 AM, Bulk Emails wrote:
    On 13/12/2024 13:38, Graham J wrote:


    I would expect a spam blocker to reject things coming from a Gmail
    address.

    Not really. spam filters would classify anything addressed as bcc. The
    letter b is for bulk and so it must be a spam!! according to spam filters.

    Rejection is not something happens. The email is entered in spam folder
    or bulk folder depending on the server. I suspect the customers might
    have configured to reject or delete all spam when arrive. The sender
    can't do anything about this except tp send them as cc but this is also
    a privacy issue.

    You are right to suggest a domain but the OP needs to have a server
    unless the registrar of the domain allows email for certain quota, which
    is unlikely. Running a server is not easy because it still requires
    somebody to allow relaying of the emails. His ISP perhaps or some free services such as Brevo (300 emails per day).

    BCC stands for "blind carbon copy" and is a way to send a copy of an
    email to someone without the other recipients knowing


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Steve Hayes@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 14 04:59:57 2024
    Reply-To: hayesstw@yahoo.com

    On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 16:48:22 +0000, Bulk Emails <noreply@brevo.com>
    wrote:

    On 13/12/2024 13:38, Graham J wrote:


    I would expect a spam blocker to reject things coming from a Gmail
    address.

    Not really. spam filters would classify anything addressed as bcc. The >letter b is for bulk and so it must be a spam!! according to spam filters.

    The letter b is for blind, so that other recipients don't see who
    received the copies.



    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Khanya Publications (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Jim the Geordie@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 14 05:35:33 2024
    On 13/12/2024 17:59, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 16:48:22 +0000, Bulk Emails <noreply@brevo.com>
    wrote:

    On 13/12/2024 13:38, Graham J wrote:


    I would expect a spam blocker to reject things coming from a Gmail
    address.

    Not really. spam filters would classify anything addressed as bcc. The
    letter b is for bulk and so it must be a spam!! according to spam filters.

    The letter b is for blind, so that other recipients don't see who
    received the copies.



    I was advised that using bcc with one 'normal' address, e.g. my own was
    a work-around, but clearly that did not apply to btinternet addresses

    --
    Jim the Geordie

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 14 06:20:17 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    Bulk Emails <noreply@brevo.com> wrote:

    On 13/12/2024 13:38, Graham J wrote:

    I would expect a spam blocker to reject things coming from a Gmail
    address.

    Not really. spam filters would classify anything addressed as bcc. The letter b is for bulk and so it must be a spam!! according to spam filters.

    Oh, you purposedly pretend yourself an idiot to mislead the OP. Or, you
    are truly ignorant of the purpose of that header.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_carbon_copy

    Or you haven't a clue how the e-mail protocols work. All recipients
    listed in a message in the client are aggregated into a list of RCPT-TO commands the client sends to the server. The To, CC, and Bcc headers
    are aggregated into a list of RCPT-TO commands. While the client adds
    the To and Cc headers to the body of the e-mail (sent during the DATA
    command), the server doesn't use those to identify the recipients. The
    Bcc header, although shown in the client, is NEVER added by the client
    in the DATA command that sends the message to the server. For each
    recipient in the aggregated list, the client sends a RCPT-TO command to
    the server. The server knows who are the recipeints by the RCPT-TO
    commands, not by any headers in the body. Just ONE copy of the message
    is sent using the DATA command. The server gets a RCPT-TO command for
    each recipient, and a DATA command for the body of the message. The
    server never gets the Bcc header since the client never included it in
    the DATA command, plus the server doesn't use any of the
    client-specified headers in the body to identify recipients. You could
    specify "joeblow@nowhere.invalid" in the To header, but the server will
    send to "markiemarkie@anywhere.yikes" specified in the RCPT-TO command.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From VanguardLH@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 14 06:42:59 2024
    Keywords: VanguardLH,VLH

    Jim the Geordie <jim@jimXscott.co.uk> wrote:

    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.

    You get some control over bulk mailings with the sending e-mail provider
    (your e-mail). You get no control over what constitutes bulk mail at
    the receiving mail server (their e-mail). 50 e-mails going to
    recipients all at the same e-mail provider is definitely bulk mail. In
    fact, a receiving server that sees multiple EXACT e-mails arriving
    without the "Precedence: bulk" header are even more likely to classify
    that repetitive inrush as spam.

    Thunderbird was not designed to be used for bulk mailing. Use an e-mail
    client that is designed for sending bulk mails, and one that lets you
    slice up bulk sends into 20, or less, at a time, and let you separate
    the separate bulk mailings by some interval, so the same receiving mail
    server doesn't see 20 come in, another 20, and another 20 all within a
    minute of each other, but sees 20 come in, another 20 show up after 10
    minutes, and so on. Even then you may hit receiving mail servers that
    see exactly the same e-mail sent multiple times to the same receiving
    server. Mail merge and bulk clients can modify the content of the body
    of the e-mails, like add recipient names, or otherwise change the body
    for each recipient, so you are not sending the exact e-mail multiple
    times to the same receiving server.

    When you send bulk e-mails, you need to use a bulk mailer to avoid
    getting your same-content e-mails detected as spam -- because they are.
    Bulk and spam are often equated to each other.

    I don't do bulk mailings, but have seen clients that are specifically
    designed to do bulk mails. I've never had to mail merge, either, except
    those often still send out en masse as fast as they can send. As I
    recall, there is a mail merge extension for Thunderbird, but once the
    mailing is started then Thunderbird will send out as fast as it can
    which means no pausing between a maximum of concurrent sends.

    https://www.google.com/search?q=free+bulk+mailing+client

    That'll start you on the task of discovering which bulk mailing client
    you might use.

    Besides the receiving server detecting multiple received e-mails all
    have the same content hence classifying all of them as spam (or bulk
    despite a missing "Precedence: bulk" header), any one of your recipients
    can report your e-mail as spam. Many users inappropriately or
    incorrectly classify unwanted e-mail as spam. They don't really know
    what constitutes spam. They report anything they don't want as spam.
    Do you have permission from every recipient for you to send them your
    bulk mailings?

    Since you are sending out bulk mails, how do you update your recipient
    list? Do you have a means for a recipient to report to you they no
    longer want your e-mails? What opt-out scheme do you use? Typically
    one person reporting once your e-mail as spam won't get you blacklisted
    as a spam source, but multiple recipients at the same receiving server,
    or the same recipient reporting multiple times, could get you
    blacklisted. You want to be polite in letting them opt-out. Of course,
    they should've opted in before you ever sent them bulk mail in the first
    place. Just because you want to send them something doesn't mean they
    want to get it. Opting out is like yelling when someone steps on your
    foot versus opting in is asking them to step on your foot. Having to
    opt out is considered rude by the sender while opt is polite. Even
    after opting in, the recipient should have a means to opt out.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Usenet Elder (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Arthur Conan Doyle@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 14 07:09:36 2024
    Reply-To: try@again.com

    Bulk Emails <noreply@brevo.com> wrote:

    Not really. spam filters would classify anything addressed as bcc. The >letter b is for bulk and so it must be a spam!! according to spam filters.

    Ahh, no. For the humor impaired the "b" in bcc stands for blind carbon copy. As in recipients of said message can't see who else received it. No legit spam filter would block such messages strictly on the basis of the To address being different than the actual address.

    --
    Usenet: The world's first (and best) social network.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: NYC (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Arthur Conan Doyle@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 14 07:10:43 2024
    Reply-To: try@again.com

    Jim the Geordie <jim@jimXscott.co.uk> wrote:

    I was advised that using bcc with one 'normal' address, e.g. my own was
    a work-around, but clearly that did not apply to btinternet addresses

    Good practise is to use the senders address as the To address to allow bcc recipients to create a reply to the sender.

    --
    Usenet: The world's first (and best) social network.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: NYC (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From David E. Ross@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 14 16:08:08 2024
    On 12/13/2024 3:22 AM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.


    When I encounter this problem (it has been a few years), I contact my
    E-mail host (Sunset.net) by phone and explain what is happening. They
    are very willing to contact the ISP that is rejecting my messages to
    work out a resolution that allows my messages to go through.

    I also contact the intended recipients of my message via an alternative
    E-mail address of mine through a different host (Spectrum) and ask them
    to complain to their ISP about missed messages.

    Generally, the problem is resolved in a very few days.

    --
    David E. Ross
    <http://www.rosde.com/>

    Paris mayor quits X platform, calling it a 'gigantic global sewer'.
    Others characterize X (previously known as Twitter) as the place
    where truth goes to die.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: I am @ David at rossde dot com. (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 14 18:58:00 2024
    On 14.12.24 06:08, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 3:22 AM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known'
    problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.


    When I encounter this problem (it has been a few years), I contact my
    E-mail host (Sunset.net) by phone and explain what is happening. They
    are very willing to contact the ISP that is rejecting my messages to
    work out a resolution that allows my messages to go through.

    I also contact the intended recipients of my message via an alternative E-mail address of mine through a different host (Spectrum) and ask them
    to complain to their ISP about missed messages.

    Generally, the problem is resolved in a very few days.

    This is maximum inefficieny and contradicts what e-mail should perform.

    --
    "Roma locuta, causa finita." (Augustinus)

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Camembert Normand aus Lait Cru (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Philip Herlihy@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 15 00:21:45 2024
    In article <vjh5d2$1shv1$1@paganini.bofh.team>, jim@jimXscott.co.uk
    says...

    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they >were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' >problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.

    Mail-Merge in Word is surprisingly easy (certainly the second time!).

    If you have Word, open a blank document.
    On the "Mailings" tab, in the "Start Mail Merge" group, click on the
    "Start Mail Merge" button and select the "Step By Step Mail Merge
    Wizard", which takes you through the steps. You'll need your contacts
    in a table of some sort (or you can select from Outlook contacts).
    Excel's handy for this, thought I tend to use Access.

    Here's a tutorial from a particularly good presenter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XifMrBegS0

    --
    --
    Phil, London

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Jim the Geordie@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 15 01:38:10 2024
    On 14/12/2024 13:21, Philip Herlihy wrote:
    In article <vjh5d2$1shv1$1@paganini.bofh.team>, jim@jimXscott.co.uk
    says...

    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known'
    problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.

    Mail-Merge in Word is surprisingly easy (certainly the second time!).

    If you have Word, open a blank document.
    On the "Mailings" tab, in the "Start Mail Merge" group, click on the
    "Start Mail Merge" button and select the "Step By Step Mail Merge
    Wizard", which takes you through the steps. You'll need your contacts
    in a table of some sort (or you can select from Outlook contacts).
    Excel's handy for this, thought I tend to use Access.

    Here's a tutorial from a particularly good presenter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XifMrBegS0

    Thanks, Philip
    That seems more than I need, but I will keep that link, just in case.
    All I am trying to do is to send a link to our website to lots of people.
    I contacted my provider, who told me that I did not have a DMARC record,
    which they have now added.
    If I understand it, I should now be able to send up to 300 emails an
    hour from my domain address, without a problem.

    --
    Jim the Geordie

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: To protect and to server (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Carlos E.R.@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 15 02:00:32 2024
    On 2024-12-13 17:48, Bulk Emails wrote:
    end them as cc but this is also
    a privacy issue.

    It is illegal in the EU.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: ---:- FTN<->UseNet Gate -:--- (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Ottavio Caruso@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 15 02:01:51 2024
    Le 13/12/2024 … 11:22, Jim the Geordie a ‚critÿ:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted
    it in case.


    You should use dedicated software like mailman.

    https://list.org/

    --
    Ottavio Caruso

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From David E. Ross@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 15 04:15:25 2024
    On 12/13/2024 11:58 PM, J=C3=B6rg Lorenz wrote:
    On 14.12.24 06:08, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 3:22 AM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a mont=
    h=20
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them =

    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as B=
    cc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails se= nt=20
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that t= hey=20
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but sinc=
    e=20
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'know= n'=20
    problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-poste=
    d=20
    it in case.


    When I encounter this problem (it has been a few years), I contact my
    E-mail host (Sunset.net) by phone and explain what is happening. They=

    are very willing to contact the ISP that is rejecting my messages to
    work out a resolution that allows my messages to go through.

    I also contact the intended recipients of my message via an alternativ=
    e
    E-mail address of mine through a different host (Spectrum) and ask the=
    m
    to complain to their ISP about missed messages.

    Generally, the problem is resolved in a very few days.
    =20
    This is maximum inefficieny and contradicts what e-mail should perform.=

    =20

    Since (1) the Sunset.net tech support is located here in the U.S. and
    (2) the problem occurs quite rarely, I do not find it inefficient.

    I do not understand why this "contradicts what e-mail should perform".

    --=20
    David E. Ross
    <http://www.rosde.com/>

    Paris mayor quits X platform, calling it a 'gigantic global sewer'.
    Others characterize X (previously known as Twitter) as the place
    where truth goes to die.


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: I am @ David at rossde dot com. (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 15 08:47:22 2024
    On 14.12.24 18:15, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 11:58 PM, J”rg Lorenz wrote:
    On 14.12.24 06:08, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 3:22 AM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month >>>> to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them
    down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc. >>>>
    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent >>>> to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they >>>> were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since >>>> all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' >>>> problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted >>>> it in case.


    When I encounter this problem (it has been a few years), I contact my
    E-mail host (Sunset.net) by phone and explain what is happening. They
    are very willing to contact the ISP that is rejecting my messages to
    work out a resolution that allows my messages to go through.

    I also contact the intended recipients of my message via an alternative
    E-mail address of mine through a different host (Spectrum) and ask them
    to complain to their ISP about missed messages.

    Generally, the problem is resolved in a very few days.

    This is maximum inefficieny and contradicts what e-mail should perform.


    Since (1) the Sunset.net tech support is located here in the U.S. and
    (2) the problem occurs quite rarely, I do not find it inefficient.

    I do not understand why this "contradicts what e-mail should perform".

    Fast and reliable without proprietary crap in the process. Gone since
    Google and Microsoft.


    --
    "Roma locuta, causa finita." (Augustinus)

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Camembert Normand aus Lait Cru (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Hank Rogers@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 15 10:51:36 2024
    J”rg Lorenz wrote:
    On 14.12.24 18:15, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 11:58 PM, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 14.12.24 06:08, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 3:22 AM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a month >>>>> to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them >>>>> down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them as Bcc. >>>>>
    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails sent >>>>> to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying that they >>>>> were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but since >>>>> all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a 'known' >>>>> problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have cross-posted >>>>> it in case.


    When I encounter this problem (it has been a few years), I contact my
    E-mail host (Sunset.net) by phone and explain what is happening. They >>>> are very willing to contact the ISP that is rejecting my messages to
    work out a resolution that allows my messages to go through.

    I also contact the intended recipients of my message via an alternative >>>> E-mail address of mine through a different host (Spectrum) and ask them >>>> to complain to their ISP about missed messages.

    Generally, the problem is resolved in a very few days.

    This is maximum inefficieny and contradicts what e-mail should perform.


    Since (1) the Sunset.net tech support is located here in the U.S. and
    (2) the problem occurs quite rarely, I do not find it inefficient.

    I do not understand why this "contradicts what e-mail should perform".

    Fast and reliable without proprietary crap in the process. Gone since
    Google and Microsoft.


    Well, we still have apple's mail. Slow as hell, but usually works, sortof.




    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From wasbit@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 15 20:39:56 2024
    On 14/12/2024 23:51, Hank Rogers wrote:
    J”rg Lorenz wrote:
    On 14.12.24 18:15, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 11:58 PM, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 14.12.24 06:08, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 3:22 AM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a
    month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them >>>>>> down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them
    as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the emails >>>>>> sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying
    that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but
    since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a
    'known'
    problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have
    cross-posted
    it in case.


    When I encounter this problem (it has been a few years), I contact my >>>>> E-mail host (Sunset.net) by phone and explain what is happening.ÿ They >>>>> are very willing to contact the ISP that is rejecting my messages to >>>>> work out a resolution that allows my messages to go through.

    I also contact the intended recipients of my message via an
    alternative
    E-mail address of mine through a different host (Spectrum) and ask
    them
    to complain to their ISP about missed messages.

    Generally, the problem is resolved in a very few days.

    This is maximum inefficieny and contradicts what e-mail should perform. >>>>

    Since (1) the Sunset.net tech support is located here in the U.S. and
    (2) the problem occurs quite rarely, I do not find it inefficient.

    I do not understand why this "contradicts what e-mail should perform".

    Fast and reliable without proprietary crap in the process. Gone since
    Google and Microsoft.


    Well, we still have apple's mail. Slow as hell, but usually works, sortof.

    So where do we get this 'apple's mail' & is it only for Apple devices or
    can anyone use it?



    --
    Regards
    wasbit

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Dec 15 21:42:54 2024
    On 15.12.24 10:39, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/12/2024 23:51, Hank Rogers wrote:
    J”rg Lorenz wrote:
    Fast and reliable without proprietary crap in the process. Gone since
    Google and Microsoft.


    Well, we still have apple's mail. Slow as hell, but usually works, sortof.

    So where do we get this 'apple's mail' & is it only for Apple devices or
    can anyone use it?

    Nowhere. It does not exist.

    --
    "Roma locuta, causa finita." (Augustinus)

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Camembert Normand aus Lait Cru (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Hank Rogers@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Dec 16 10:55:46 2024
    wasbit wrote:
    On 14/12/2024 23:51, Hank Rogers wrote:
    Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 14.12.24 18:15, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 11:58 PM, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 14.12.24 06:08, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 12/13/2024 3:22 AM, Jim the Geordie wrote:
    I am secretary of a music group and send out emails about once a >>>>>>> month
    to about 150 people.
    I had trouble with there being too many at a time so I 1) broke them >>>>>>> down to groups of around 50 2) used a Gmail address 3) sent them >>>>>>> as Bcc.

    It all seemed to be going well until this time when all the
    emails sent
    to btinternet.com addresses bounced-back with a message saying
    that they
    were classed as spam.

    I suppose I could use mail merge (which I have never tried), but >>>>>>> since
    all other addresses were received, I wondered whether this is a >>>>>>> 'known'
    problem, and is there a way round it?

    I doubt whether this is a Thunderbird problem, but I have
    cross-posted
    it in case.


    When I encounter this problem (it has been a few years), I contact my >>>>>> E-mail host (Sunset.net) by phone and explain what is happening. >>>>>> They
    are very willing to contact the ISP that is rejecting my messages to >>>>>> work out a resolution that allows my messages to go through.

    I also contact the intended recipients of my message via an
    alternative
    E-mail address of mine through a different host (Spectrum) and ask >>>>>> them
    to complain to their ISP about missed messages.

    Generally, the problem is resolved in a very few days.

    This is maximum inefficieny and contradicts what e-mail should
    perform.


    Since (1) the Sunset.net tech support is located here in the U.S. and
    (2) the problem occurs quite rarely, I do not find it inefficient.

    I do not understand why this "contradicts what e-mail should perform".

    Fast and reliable without proprietary crap in the process. Gone since
    Google and Microsoft.


    Well, we still have apple's mail. Slow as hell, but usually works,
    sortof.

    So where do we get this 'apple's mail' & is it only for Apple devices or
    can anyone use it?


    https://apps.apple.com/us/app/mail/id1108187098

    I think it only works on apple products.




    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Hank Rogers@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Dec 16 10:57:12 2024
    J”rg Lorenz wrote:
    On 15.12.24 10:39, wasbit wrote:
    On 14/12/2024 23:51, Hank Rogers wrote:
    Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    Fast and reliable without proprietary crap in the process. Gone since
    Google and Microsoft.


    Well, we still have apple's mail. Slow as hell, but usually works, sortof. >>
    So where do we get this 'apple's mail' & is it only for Apple devices or
    can anyone use it?

    Nowhere. It does not exist.


    Here it is Jughead:

    https://apps.apple.com/us/app/mail/id1108187098



    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Steve Hayes@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Dec 16 18:37:08 2024
    Reply-To: hayesstw@yahoo.com

    On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 09:39:56 +0000, wasbit <wasbit@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 14/12/2024 23:51, Hank Rogers wrote:
    Well, we still have apple's mail. Slow as hell, but usually works, sortof.

    So where do we get this 'apple's mail' & is it only for Apple devices or
    can anyone use it?

    There's also Pegasus mail, which I use.


    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Khanya Publications (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From wasbit@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Dec 16 20:23:28 2024
    On 15/12/2024 23:55, Hank Rogers wrote:
    wasbit wrote:
    snip <

    Well, we still have apple's mail. Slow as hell, but usually works,
    sortof.

    So where do we get this 'apple's mail' & is it only for Apple devices
    or can anyone use it?


    https://apps.apple.com/us/app/mail/id1108187098

    I think it only works on apple products.


    Thanks



    --
    Regards
    wasbit

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)