I think one genuine IBM innovation was the invention of chain printers,
which did a much better job of this sort of thing.
I think that, even with IBM, band printers have replaced chain printers. We had a DEC band printer (LP <something> maybe LP32) and it did a superb job.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
I think one genuine IBM innovation was the invention of chain printers, >> which did a much better job of this sort of thing.
On 2025-02-12, Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> wrote:
I think that, even with IBM, band printers have replaced chain printers. We had a DEC band printer (LP <something> maybe LP32) and it did a superb job.
All high-speed printers have "jitter" on character positioning. Early
line printers were drum printers, and the jitter showed up as vertical positioning instability, which looked very sloppy. On chain and band printers, the jitter was horizontal, so the lines still lokked straight.
The advantage of the chain over the band was that it allowed for
adjustments to the character set by replacing individual slugs in the
chain. Important when supporting non-English languages.
The Diablo 630 was the canonical daisywheel at least as far as controlWe had one of those. The "engineer" who delivered it and attached it to
codes went. [...]
Anyone remember daisywheel printers? OK, hardly mainframe speeds!
Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
---|---|
Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
Users: | 9 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 127:34:24 |
Calls: | 161 |
Files: | 21,502 |
Messages: | 79,018 |