On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 00:56:30 +0800, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 11-Dec-24 4:12 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 07:57:42 +1100, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 07:51:12 +1100, Rod Speed
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-12-09/qld-middle-island-light-plane- crash-pilot-trial-les-woodall/104704578
Its completely stupid to claim that the result was the pilot's fault
and not due to the engine failure.
And pilots are not trained to keep going straight ahead on engine
failure, they are actually trained to head for the safest place to
land that the plane can get to after the engine failure.
And its stupid to claim that a plane falls out of the sky when it
stalls. The Cessna 172 involved in fact mushes and doesnt stall.
And the pilot should never have been charged in the first place given
that he wasnt responsible for the engine failure.
https://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/investigation_reports/2017/aair/ ao-2017-005
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-12-11/qld-pilot-crash-trial-verdict- middle-island-leslie-woodall/104713122
It does seem rather unreasonable.
I assume there will be an appeal.
Sylvia.
" Aviation experts called as witnesses during the trial all agreed
Woodall went against best practice "
I cant wait to see trial transcripts to find out who all these experts
were, I would hope not all are in the employ of the commonwealth.
--- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
* Origin: Ausics -
https://newsgroups.ausics.net (3:633/280.2@fidonet)