What the hell is WRONG with WASPs anyway to have so many names like
"charlie, kelly, taylor, alex, jordan" to name a few for BOTH MEN and WOMEN?


Waiting UNTIL the ball leaves the bowler's hands is quite "simple and
easy" to both "understand and implement".

CASE CLOSED.



Excerpts:


"It was a plan, because we had warned her [for leaving the crease early] repeatedly," Deepti told reporters upon the team's arrival in Kolkata.
"We did things as per the rules and guidelines. We told the umpires as
well, but she was there [outside the crease]. We couldn't do much."

A detailed analysis by ESPNcricinfo's Peter Della Penna, who used a
microscope to check every delivery of England's innings since Dean's
arrival at the crease, she had left the crease early, before the bowler
had released the ball, 71 times, and was dismissed on the 72nd occasion.

Alex Hales - currently on a comeback trail with the England T20I squad - backed Deepti's act, saying, "it shouldn't be difficult for the
non-striker to stay in their crease till the ball has left the hand".


"MCC's message to non-strikers continues to be to remain in their ground
until they have seen the ball leave the bowler's hand. Then dismissals,
such as the one seen yesterday, cannot happen. Whilst yesterday was
indeed an unusual end to an exciting match, it was properly officiated
and should not be considered as anything more."


=============================================================================



https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/deepti-sharma-charlie-dean-run-out-eng-w-vs-ind-w-2022-3rd-odi-deepti-says-it-was-a-plan-1336620

'We had warned her repeatedly' - Deepti Sharma on the Charlie Dean dismissal

According to research done by ESPNcricinfo's Peter Della Penna, the
dismissal came on the 72nd occasion that Dean had left the crease early
in that innings

Was Deepti Sharma running Charlie Dean out at the non-striker's end at
Lord's on Saturday a plan India had worked out in advance? Or was it an instinctive decision?

According to Deepti, who stopped in her bowling stride and whipped off
the bails at the non-striker's end to complete a 3-0 sweep over England,
it was a plan, but one that was formulated after repeated warnings to
Dean. Though, according to the rules - the matter of the spirit of the
game is a different one altogether - the fielding team is well within
its rights to run batters out for backing up too much without any warning.

"It was a plan, because we had warned her [for leaving the crease early] repeatedly," Deepti told reporters upon the team's arrival in Kolkata.
"We did things as per the rules and guidelines. We told the umpires as
well, but she was there [outside the crease]. We couldn't do much."

A detailed analysis by ESPNcricinfo's Peter Della Penna, who used a
microscope to check every delivery of England's innings since Dean's
arrival at the crease, she had left the crease early, before the bowler
had released the ball, 71 times, and was dismissed on the 72nd occasion.

Dean's dismissal, leaving England 16 short, triggered widespread spirit-of-cricket debates. Several prominent England cricketers,
including Stuart Broad, James Anderson and Sam Billings, tweeted their displeasure at the dismissal. Others, like Alex Hales - currently on a comeback trail with the England T20I squad - backed Deepti's act,
saying, "it shouldn't be difficult for the non-striker to stay in their
crease till the ball has left the hand".

When asked the question after she had led India to an ODI series win in England after 23 years, Harmanpreet Kaur had told the official
broadcaster that no "crime" had been committed.

"MCC's message to non-strikers continues to be to remain in their ground
until they have seen the ball leave the bowler's hand. Then dismissals,
such as the one seen yesterday, cannot happen. Whilst yesterday was
indeed an unusual end to an exciting match, it was properly officiated
and should not be considered as anything more."



--- MBSE BBS v1.0.8 (Linux-x86_64)
* Origin: fastusenet - www.fastusenet.org (3:633/280.2@fidonet)