• 'To hell with the spirit of the game' - Hardik unfussed about non-stri

    From FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Oct 29 19:08:40 2022
    Subject: 'To hell with the spirit of the game' - Hardik unfussed about
    non-striker run-outs



    Just IMAGINE if Wasim made it to strikers end without getting run out
    and Pak won in Super over.

    Which is why, all cricket players MUST MOVE ON from the spirit of
    cricket past and LIVE IN THE MOMENT and PLAY BY THE "NEW RULES".




    https://twitter.com/PeterDellaPenna/status/1585648159295909888
    Wasim had left the non-striker's end before Evans leaped into his
    delivery stride, huge start. Raza's best option for a runout was always striker's end.


    =======================================================================



    https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/to-hell-with-the-spirit-of-the-game-hardik-unfussed-about-non-striker-run-outs-1341573

    'To hell with the spirit of the game' - Hardik unfussed about
    non-striker run-outs

    "If it's there, then remove the rule - as simple as that. The ones who
    have a problem, good for them; it's fine"

    India allrounder Hardik Pandya is fine with bowlers running non-strikers
    out if they stray out of the crease. Speaking on The ICC Review podcast,
    ahead of the start of the T20 World Cup in Australia, Hardik also said
    he isn't fussed about spirit-of-cricket debates around the mode of
    dismissal.

    "We need to stop making a fuss about this. It's a rule - [as] simple as
    that," Hardik said. "To hell with the spirit of the game. If it's there, [then] remove the rule - as simple as that. The ones who have a problem,
    good for them; it's fine.

    "Personally, I have no problem. If I am walking out [of the crease], and someone runs me out - fair enough. It's my mistake, not the bowler's. He
    is taking the rules to his advantage - [as] simple as that. That'll not
    make a big deal."

    The debate surrounding the spirit of cricket and fairness of such a
    dismissal was reignited last month when Deepti Sharma ran Charlie Dean
    out at Lord's in the deciding ODI of the series between England and
    India. England were nine down and needed 17 off 39 balls before Deepti
    flicked the bails off to catch Dean short.

    Earlier this March, the MCC had de-stigmatised running non-strikers out
    by shifting the move of a player being run out by the bowler while
    backing up from Law 41 (which deals with unfair play) to Law 38 (which
    deals with run-outs) in its recent update. More recently Australia quick Mitchell Starc suggested umpires use on-ground cameras to make
    "short-run" calls if the non-striker tries to gain an advantage. Starc
    spoke after informally warning Jos Buttler about the England batter
    leaving the non-striker's end before he released the ball. Starc felt
    that docking the batting side a run in such circumstances would leave
    "no grey area".

    "Every time the batter leaves the crease before the front foot lands,
    dock them a run. There's no grey area then," he had said. "And in T20
    cricket where runs are so handy at the back end and games can be decided
    by one, two, three runs all the time, if all of a sudden you get docked
    20 runs because a batter's leaving early, you're going to stop doing it, aren't you?"

    Bowlers like R Ashwin have been vocal about promoting the use of the dismissal, having run Buttler out the same way in an IPL game in 2019.
    Running a non-striker out has historically been one of cricket's most controversial and opinion-dividing topics. In the past, bowlers who
    practiced running non-strikers out - like West Indies' Keemo Paul, for example, at an Under-19 World Cup game - have taken a step back from
    doing so after receiving backlash over their decision.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Aioe.org NNTP Server (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Oct 30 03:07:16 2022
    Subject: Re: 'To hell with the spirit of the game' - Hardik unfussed about
    non-striker run-outs

    On 10/29/2022 1:08 AM, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:


    Just IMAGINE if Wasim made it to strikers end without getting run out
    and Pak won in Super over.

    Which is why, all cricket players MUST MOVE ON from the spirit of
    cricket past and LIVE IN THE MOMENT and PLAY BY THE "NEW RULES".





    I phrased it wrong.


    I meant


    Just IMAGINE the CONTROVERSY if Wasim barely made it to strikers end,
    with Pak needing one run to win on the last ball and the ball thrown to strikers end.









    https://twitter.com/PeterDellaPenna/status/1585648159295909888
    Wasim had left the non-striker's end before Evans leaped into his
    delivery stride, huge start. Raza's best option for a runout was always striker's end.


    =======================================================================



    https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/to-hell-with-the-spirit-of-the-game-hardik-unfussed-about-non-striker-run-outs-1341573

    'To hell with the spirit of the game' - Hardik unfussed about
    non-striker run-outs

    "If it's there, then remove the rule - as simple as that. The ones who
    have a problem, good for them; it's fine"

    India allrounder Hardik Pandya is fine with bowlers running non-strikers
    out if they stray out of the crease. Speaking on The ICC Review podcast, ahead of the start of the T20 World Cup in Australia, Hardik also said
    he isn't fussed about spirit-of-cricket debates around the mode of dismissal.

    "We need to stop making a fuss about this. It's a rule - [as] simple as that," Hardik said. "To hell with the spirit of the game. If it's there, [then] remove the rule - as simple as that. The ones who have a problem, good for them; it's fine.

    "Personally, I have no problem. If I am walking out [of the crease], and someone runs me out - fair enough. It's my mistake, not the bowler's. He
    is taking the rules to his advantage - [as] simple as that. That'll not
    make a big deal."

    The debate surrounding the spirit of cricket and fairness of such a dismissal was reignited last month when Deepti Sharma ran Charlie Dean
    out at Lord's in the deciding ODI of the series between England and
    India. England were nine down and needed 17 off 39 balls before Deepti flicked the bails off to catch Dean short.

    Earlier this March, the MCC had de-stigmatised running non-strikers out
    by shifting the move of a player being run out by the bowler while
    backing up from Law 41 (which deals with unfair play) to Law 38 (which
    deals with run-outs) in its recent update. More recently Australia quick Mitchell Starc suggested umpires use on-ground cameras to make
    "short-run" calls if the non-striker tries to gain an advantage. Starc
    spoke after informally warning Jos Buttler about the England batter
    leaving the non-striker's end before he released the ball. Starc felt
    that docking the batting side a run in such circumstances would leave
    "no grey area".

    "Every time the batter leaves the crease before the front foot lands,
    dock them a run. There's no grey area then," he had said. "And in T20 cricket where runs are so handy at the back end and games can be decided
    by one, two, three runs all the time, if all of a sudden you get docked
    20 runs because a batter's leaving early, you're going to stop doing it, aren't you?"

    Bowlers like R Ashwin have been vocal about promoting the use of the dismissal, having run Buttler out the same way in an IPL game in 2019. Running a non-striker out has historically been one of cricket's most controversial and opinion-dividing topics. In the past, bowlers who practiced running non-strikers out - like West Indies' Keemo Paul, for example, at an Under-19 World Cup game - have taken a step back from
    doing so after receiving backlash over their decision.


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Aioe.org NNTP Server (3:633/280.2@fidonet)