fir pisze:
fir pisze:
fir pisze:right now i got simple framework with flying ships and simple shoting by
[...]
Are you still working on your 3d engine?
i wouldnt say im workin on 3d engine - i usually has no focus
and energy to work on more serious projects (if i had
i would need to finish furia compiler)..but i sometimes toy
with some smaller pices (to work days or at most few weaks with it)
to draw some conclusions with it
3 engine btw i wouldnt see so much serious as 3d engine is like one
function... but more interesting is like testing some spaceship flying
routines i 3d space (you know some algorithms form this bot pilots,
shoting , dodgin obstacles..i would like to study it a bit though im
presently quite weary/ wear off energy)
bullets and missiles
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vmkk7S9z6c8
as thise missiles has a limit velocity 30 m/s amd limits on angular
velocity and acceleration they may not shoot a target as those ships
may move faster˙ (as missiles have also life time like 30 seconds or so
and then vanish)
some may observe as those missiles chase the ships etc
the problem is to add more interesting and "well tweaked" bahaviours
to those ships missiles and things and to find if there could be some
"juicy" uotcome form that making those simple space fights pleasurable
maybe cleaver and skill dependat
its not necessary an easy thing bcouse there is maybe a lot of
tweaking involved and most things some wrote (maybe) is noy "juicy"
the goal is to find "juicy"
(i treat is as one of potential exercises in coding..nothing special
but potentially interesting)
overally writig such pices i find hard - it s maybe becouse its not liek
you got well defined goal and you just need to code it
here the technical aspect of coding those maneuvres is not so hard
(not so hard to do it at least not very preciselly) but the goal
(og getting "jiucy" is not clear defined and that makes it hard it aso ttrigers somewha "codin neurosis" where you are afraid of coding it (possibly becouse its not defined goal so absolute no guarantee i can
just write it)..its makes it hard imo
arnold@hooterville.invalid (Arnold Ziffel) writes:
fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> wrote:
i know i could but it would take my mental focus to much when i need to >>> fozus on point....
Are you in a hurry when you post here?
You can focus on the problem, writing it the best you can, and then just
run what you wrote through the AI tool of your choice. Does it really take >> so much time and effort?
There are upsides to that as well. By using proper English you'll increase >> the likelihood of people responding to you.
fir has been writing this way for a very long time, at least 14 years.
If multiple attempts to persuade him to make an effort to write more
clearly have failed, one more try isn't likely to do any better.
(My personal solution is a killfile.)
On 2026-10-19, Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote:
arnold@hooterville.invalid (Arnold Ziffel) writes:
fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> wrote:
i know i could but it would take my mental focus to much when i need to >>>> fozus on point....
Are you in a hurry when you post here?
You can focus on the problem, writing it the best you can, and then just >>> run what you wrote through the AI tool of your choice. Does it really take >>> so much time and effort?
There are upsides to that as well. By using proper English you'll increase >>> the likelihood of people responding to you.
fir has been writing this way for a very long time, at least 14 years.
If multiple attempts to persuade him to make an effort to write more
clearly have failed, one more try isn't likely to do any better.
(My personal solution is a killfile.)
+1
Chris M. Thomasson pisze:
On 9/25/2026 6:39 PM, fir wrote:
do you used ai to generate codes in c? some observations or[...]
thoughts maybe?
Are you still working on your 3d engine? If so, try to recreate the
following simple scene:
https://youtu.be/n13GHyYEfLA?list=RDn13GHyYEfLA
its ok+, music is good and this backroud is good
kow its done? geometry of bitmaps?
with ai i coud learn ogl/dx/vulcan quite fast i guess but
i more lie rasterization as by now..more fun to me than dwelling in
complex libraries
(My personal solution is a killfile.)
Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote:
(My personal solution is a killfile.)
You have a valid point. Yet, using a killfile isn't a solution if people
keep replying to him (and I probably just became a part of the problem).
Arnold Ziffel pisze:
Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote:
(My personal solution is a killfile.)
You have a valid point. Yet, using a killfile isn't a solution if people
keep replying to him (and I probably just became a part of the problem).
terrible problem for mental reductionist...
note i once mentioned that opinion may vary who is a troll KT (imposing
his rude mentally reduced views) or me(imposing more oryginal one)
but honestly..the answer is maybe more clear ;c
(note i mentioned this 'relativity' becouse some dose of relativity is
worth an esteem..but it is if we speak more theoretical in practice
the mental reductions go quite bad and no fun, so im only partial
relativisc in fact here (my aopinions may yet change here also))
Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote:
(My personal solution is a killfile.)
You have a valid point. Yet, using a killfile isn't a solution if people keep replying to him (and I probably just became a part of the problem).
Under grouplens protocol, the scores you assign to articles are shared
with other users, so you can effectively express the concept of "don't
show me what my friend Bob, also a regular of the newsgroup, doesn't
want to see, but with a weight of 0.75 assigned to Bob's scores" ...
Kaz Kylheku <046-301-5902@kylheku.com> wrote:
Under grouplens protocol, the scores you assign to articles are shared
with other users, so you can effectively express the concept of "don't
show me what my friend Bob, also a regular of the newsgroup, doesn't
want to see, but with a weight of 0.75 assigned to Bob's scores" ...
Is it really worth it? The number of posters isn't that high, we can all decide ourselves who we want to read. The problem is different here.
| Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
|---|---|
| Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
| Users: | 4 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 190:54:36 |
| Calls: | 222 |
| Files: | 21,513 |
| Messages: | 85,912 |