Then you get some guy who took a job that was to include scheduling on any days, per the boss' needs. & he later converted to some obscure religion that had certain days off, & sued, as the boss, when asked for those days to be blocked off, essentially said, "I hired you to fill any shifts without blocked off times," sadly, the courts ruled against the employer, & he had to pay back pay plus interest for those days worked against his newfound religion.
Then you get some guy who took a job that was to include scheduling on any >> days, per the boss' needs. & he later converted to some obscure religionWhere and when did that happen? I would think that there would be equal "laws
that had certain days off, & sued, as the boss, when asked for those days >> to be blocked off, essentially said, "I hired you to fill any shifts
without blocked off times," sadly, the courts ruled against the employer, >> & he had to pay back pay plus interest for those days worked against his
newfound religion.
and tests in law that define WHEN someone's idea of religion is actually a valid religion.
Where and when did that happen? I would think that there would be equal
"laws and tests in law that define WHEN someone's idea of religion is
actually a valid religion.
It was preposterous; it happened here in BC; abbotsford, I believe (right in the middle of the biggest Bible Belt of Canada--I grew up just across the river & hung around in Abbotsford's malls as a ne'er-do-well teen)
Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
---|---|
Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
Users: | 7 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 202:26:56 |
Calls: | 46 |
Files: | 21,492 |
Messages: | 63,640 |