Mike Powell wrote to All <=-
IBM orders workers back to the office, or face the consequences
IBM orders workers back to the office, or face the consequences
This story was pretty amazing - "relocation assistance" for people 50
miles away from the office or greater, meaning no more remote work. 8
offices in some of the most expensive places to live in the US with no mention of compensation for people who need to move, and buried in the
story is some confusing language around DEI - sticking to ideals of DEI
while adhering to local applicable laws and government policies, while 10x-ing their hiring in India left me confused.
Mike Powell wrote to KURT WEISKE <=-
Having worked closely with IBM for many years, I am not too shocked
that this all sounds confusing. With tech, and especially sales, a lot
of workers are on the road most of the time anyway so I am not sure why having them "in the office" would even be important. Even when they
are "in the office" they won't be there.
I suppose they still have those "big iron" clients out there, pretty
Mike Powell wrote to KURT WEISKE <=-
I suppose they still have those "big iron" clients out there, pretty
Yes, they did where I worked. They actually moved to hosting the "big iron" in a cloud-like service. I forget what they called it, but the machines reside at one of their IBM facilities.
Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
---|---|
Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
Users: | 7 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 148:28:15 |
Calls: | 154 |
Files: | 21,500 |
Messages: | 76,103 |