Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
The food stamp system should be reformed altogether. Maybe let someone have $100 worth of food in an emergency situation, if they qualify, but not on a monthly basis. One time deal: here's $100. Get a sandwich, and get a job.
It's too much work to find out what material possessions they own, when they obtained them, what they cost, and how much they can sell them
for.
She ought to simplify the problem instead of complicating it more.
Aaron Thomas wrote to IB Joe <=-
Suppose a lady marries a guy who gives her a $100,000 wedding ring.
Then he loses his job, and they apply for food stamps. Should the
social worker notice that she's wearing a huge diamond ring and say
"Well maam, we're gonna have to get that ring appraised before we
approve your food stamp application?"
I agree. The best thing is to push SNAP down into the places like churches - like they used to be back in my grandparent's day - where the people doling out the money know you and know what you are doing (or not doing).
But you need to remember that all these gov't programs intend to cause
and perpetuate the problem, not to solve it.
Complicating the program opens up more room for graft and fraud.
It's too much work to find out what material possessions they own, wh they obtained them, what they cost, and how much they can sell them for.
I agree. The best thing is to push SNAP down into the places like churches - like they used to be back in my grandparent's day - where the people doling out the money know you and know what you are doing (or not doing).
She ought to simplify the problem instead of complicating it more.
But you need to remember that all these gov't programs intend to cause
and perpetuate the problem, not to solve it.
Complicating the program opens up more room for graft and fraud.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
I recall this was the case... and I'm just a believer in a social
safety net... We pay taxes...
Ron, think about the Trillions and Trillions we are in debt and most of
it can be attributed to waste abuse and fraud.
I think @Aaron is over thinking a little. I'll be eligible for Social Security and when I apply I want EVERYTHING coming to me... I had to
put up with the Obama admin and the Biden admin without loosing hope
for humanity.
Anyway, I support safety nets... I don't support the Sh!t Show that led
us to trillions in debt.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
The churches around here already give actual food away (St James
Pantry, St Michaels, etc.) The government social workers should just
give people the address to the church pantries.
That's why we need to move the safety net OUTSIDE the gov't with no gov't involvement at all.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
I'm not on page with you here... Government isn't all bad...
These assholes make the loans available, they take the loans, and then pass a law so that they don't have to pay them back.
This can be regulated in some way... I recall back in the 80s, I think, that congress took money out of the SS System... they said its not a
big deal... bastards lied.
There has to be some mechanism in place where congress can't dip into these funds because they have some BS story.
Smells like a conflict of interest to me.
| Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
|---|---|
| Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
| Users: | 15 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 177:40:51 |
| Calls: | 216 |
| Files: | 21,502 |
| Messages: | 83,011 |