Chat GPT wrote:

Determining the popularity of two iconic Doctors, Tom Baker as the
Fourth Doctor and David Tennant as the Tenth Doctor, requires a
nuanced examination of their respective eras, contributions to the
series, and impact on the fanbase.

How can any AI generated text be nuanced?

Ultimately, the popularity of each Doctor is subjective
and dependent on individual preferences and experiences
within the vast and diverse Doctor Who fandom.

It took over a hundred lines of text for Chat-GPT to tell us
that?!!!!

You could have done that in three lines Dave... but of course, it
bumps up the ol' message size stats for you doesn't it?!


--- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
* Origin: Indigo News (3:633/280.2@fidonet)

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0oi8cluuiz0n00a@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

Chat GPT wrote:

Ultimately, the popularity of each Doctor is subjective
and dependent on individual preferences and experiences
within the vast and diverse Doctor Who fandom.

It took over a hundred lines of text for Chat-GPT to tell us
that?!!!!

You could have done that in three lines Dave... but of course, it
bumps up the ol' message size stats for you doesn't it?!

Can you do better with 50 words?

Easy.

When comparing the Fourth and Tenth Doctor, their popularity is
subjective and based on individual preferences as Doctor Who is a
broad church.

--- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
* Origin: Indigo News (3:633/280.2@fidonet)

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0oi8dhyvo9i400h@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0oi8cluuiz0n00a@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

Chat GPT wrote:

Ultimately, the popularity of each Doctor is subjective
and dependent on individual preferences and experiences
within the vast and diverse Doctor Who fandom.

It took over a hundred lines of text for Chat-GPT to tell us
that?!!!!

You could have done that in three lines Dave... but of
course, it bumps up the ol' message size stats for you
doesn't it?!

Can you do better with 50 words?

Easy.

When comparing the Fourth and Tenth Doctor, their popularity is
subjective and based on individual preferences as Doctor Who is a
broad church.

Fail.

I reached the same conclusion - without all the waffle - in three
lines... <shrugs>

--- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
* Origin: Indigo News (3:633/280.2@fidonet)

Daniel65 wrote:

The Doctor wrote on 19/2/24 12:52 pm:

In article <xn0oi8dhyvo9i400h@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

Can you do better with 50 words?

Easy.

When comparing the Fourth and Tenth Doctor, their popularity is subjective and based on individual preferences as Doctor Who
is a broad church.

Fail.

Why is Blueshirt's effort a FAIL, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", when
he, apparently, came to the same conclusion as YOUR
CHATGPT-thingee, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"??

But the main point is, why is Dave using Chat-GPT to put forth
ideas?For someone who has been a long-time Doctor Who fan, why not
make his own comparisons?

--- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
* Origin: Indigo News (3:633/280.2@fidonet)

The Doctor wrote:

In article <uqvav3$1qtdc$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

The Doctor wrote on 19/2/24 12:52 pm:

In article <xn0oi8dhyvo9i400h@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

When comparing the Fourth and Tenth Doctor, their popularity is
subjective and based on individual preferences as Doctor Who
is a broad church.

Fail.

Why is Blueshirt's effort a FAIL, "Yellow Beard Yadallee", when
he, apparently, came to the same conclusion as YOUR
CHATGPT-thingee, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"??

Too basic an argument REd-bearded Dannyboy!

There is no argument, only opinions. However, you are not even
posting your opinion, you are just copy and pasting from Chat-GPT.

So if there is a 'fail' in this discussion it's from YOU for failing
to contribute what you think!

--- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
* Origin: Indigo News (3:633/280.2@fidonet)

Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The radw village idiot, falsely posting as “The Doctor”, wrote:

Too basic an argument REd-bearded Dannyboy!

There is no argument, only opinions. However, you are not even
posting your opinion, you are just copy and pasting from Chat-GPT.

So if there is a 'fail' in this discussion it's from YOU for failing
to contribute what you think!

You’re being unreasonable. You wouldn’t expect a blind person to be fine without their white stick and guide dog would you?

Therefore, it is only fair to allow those without brains, intelligence or opinions to use ChatGPT as a crutch to permit a limited form of thinking
for them.

You go Dave! But to prevent this sort of confusion in future it would be helpful if you could start your AI generated posts with a disclaimer such
as:


“Please allow ChatGPT to substitute for my thoughts - I am mentally challenged. Not all disabilities are visible.”


There. I’ve put it in a separate paragraph for you to copy and paste.
Perhaps you could use it as your .sig? Then you’d only have to paste it the once.

--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

--- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)

The Doctor wrote:

In article <xn0oi9mpb23xc8u002@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

The Doctor wrote:

Too basic an argument REd-bearded Dannyboy!

There is no argument, only opinions. However, you are not even
posting your opinion, you are just copy and pasting from
Chat-GPT.

So if there is a 'fail' in this discussion it's from YOU for
failing to contribute what you think!

Welcome to the new world. Are you real or are you artificial?

You're still not contributing to the discussion... just
side-stepping the point.

--- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
* Origin: Indigo News (3:633/280.2@fidonet)

The Doctor wrote:

In article <ur1mf5$2db0m$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:

Therefore, it is only fair to allow those without brains,
intelligence or opinions to use ChatGPT as a crutch to permit a
limited form of thinking for them.

You go Dave! But to prevent this sort of confusion in future it
would be helpful if you could start your AI generated posts with
a disclaimer such as:

Please allow ChatGPT to substitute for my thoughts - I am
mentally challenged. Not all disabilities are visible.

You are pulling a BlueShirt.

There's no need for that sort of talk David!

I do have hands yer know.

--- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
* Origin: Indigo News (3:633/280.2@fidonet)