In article <GZPQGm1LczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
On 23.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca>
wrote:
Subject: ChatGPT comments...
Please stop.
If anyone wants some robot arranging words in some essay on any of
these subjects, I'm sure they can find out how to do it.
Well let's see what scraping the Internet results in.
In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves, and
not dump it here unasked.
Oi! Articles are worth discussing.
In article <GZPQY65aczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
On 23.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca>
wrote:
In article <GZPQGm1LczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
On 23.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca>
wrote:
Subject: ChatGPT comments...
Please stop.
If anyone wants some robot arranging words in some essay on any of
these subjects, I'm sure they can find out how to do it.
Well let's see what scraping the Internet results in.
Let's anyone who wants to see it ask the robot themselves, and not
dump it here unasked.
Oi! Articales are worth discussing.
In article <GZTQxaxLczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
In article <GZPQGm1LczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
Subject: ChatGPT comments...
Please stop.
What articles? It's just a bunch of words arranged by some computer
program, no real person involved. Not worth reading.
In other words: Just more noise from you.
IYIO.
In article <GZXRIbqqczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
On 25.02.24, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca>
wrote:
In article <GZTQxaxLczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
In article <GZPQGm1LczB@ATH>, Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
Subject: ChatGPT comments...
Please stop.
What articles? It's just a bunch of words arranged by some
computer program, no real person involved. Not worth reading.
In other words: Just more noise from you.
IYIO.
I guess that means In Your Inspired Opinion.
It's certainly in my never humbe opinion.
The send I is the opposite of Humble.
And it's certainly not from any real person, so no one to reply to
and talk about it. Why bother read it? Why post it here?
I might as well count the bumps on my woodchip wallpaper, and start
drawing circles around one or the other, then post pictures of it
here so you can all admire me interacting with a non-entity.
Or is it based on what people think?
In article <xn0oii6ahau6qxi008@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Mickmane wrote:
You're posting stuff you don't even know the source of.
I assume Doctor Who fans are responsible for inputting that stuff,
as Chat-GPT doesn't make it up.
But with no sources quoted it just becomes irrelevant in the big
scheme of things.
As Dave posts it but he doesn't even say if he agrees with it or not!
Wait, why am I even trying to reason with you. I already know
you're completely insane.
That didn't take long!!!
I thought I could still just talk with you, kindly, what with you
not knowing what you're doing. But if you keep spamming this
nonsense, all that spam will be deleted on arrival, before I even
see it.
We all go through that stage...
In article <xn0oii6ahau6qxi008@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Mickmane wrote:
Aaah, those posts from xsnews still don't get here!
In article <xn0oii6ahau6qxi008@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
As Dave posts it but he doesn't even say if he agrees with it
or not!
There's that.
Mickmane wrote:
In article <xn0oii6ahau6qxi008@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
As Dave posts it but he doesn't even say if he agrees with it
or not!
There's that.
I think if Dave posted a one paragraph CHAT-GPT article and then
wrote why he agreed or disagreed with it, that would be something.
But he just cuts-and-pastes and dumps it here...
Mickmane wrote:
In article <xn0oii6ahau6qxi008@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Mickmane wrote:
Aaah, those posts from xsnews still don't get here!
Speak to your news admin...
Mickmane wrote on 26/2/24 8:09 pm:
In article <xn0oii6ahau6qxi008@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Mickmane wrote:
Aaah, those posts from xsnews still don't get here!
You're posting stuff you don't even know the source of.
I assume Doctor Who fans are responsible for inputting that stuff,
as Chat-GPT doesn't make it up.
Could be Doctor Who haters, or random people who know nothing about
the series. Could be purple tentacles posting from Pluto.
Isn't Chat-GPT an 'AI' computer program thinkee where you give it a
few basic ideas/suggestion and a required Document length (i.e. Word
count) and IT spits out the end product??
On 27.02.24, Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Isn't Chat-GPT an 'AI' computer program thinkee where you give
it a few basic ideas/suggestion and a required Document length
(i.e. Word count) and IT spits out the end product??
I don't know. I imagine it gets a subject, and then spits out
irrelevant blah.
In article <xn0oikym4do1b63001@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
He's in Canada, their English is different... those parts that do
English that is! (I was at a Hockey game in Canada once and they
sang the Canadian national anthem in French!)
You must have been in Montreal!
Mickmane wrote:
On 27.02.24, Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Isn't Chat-GPT an 'AI' computer program thinkee where you give
it a few basic ideas/suggestion and a required Document length
(i.e. Word count) and IT spits out the end product??
I don't know. I imagine it gets a subject, and then spits out
irrelevant blah.
Are we on about Chat-GPT or Dave?
Mickmane wrote:
On 27.02.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Mickmane wrote:
In article <xn0oii6ahau6qxi008@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Mickmane wrote:
Aaah, those posts from xsnews still don't get here!
Speak to your news admin...
I did, right now he's too busy with his real world job to spend
time to investigate.
(This newsserver thing is a hobby of him.)
It's a good hobby, but he should at least investigate why his spam
filters are stopping messages that get peered everywhere else...
Will have to wait until he finds time, or you just only post from
indigo. :)
If I could turn the clock back twenty years I would!!! :-)
In article <xn0oil25fdspyqw002@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0oikym4do1b63001@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
He's in Canada, their English is different... those parts
that do English that is! (I was at a Hockey game in Canada
once and they sang the Canadian national anthem in French!)
You must have been in Montreal!
Indeed I was... Blueshirt was at the Bell Centre watching the
Blueshirts!
An not the tri-coleurs!
On 28.02.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
It's a good hobby, but he should at least investigate why his
spam filters are stopping messages that get peered everywhere
else...
Oddly, this got here. Maybe he did! :)
What's the difference between the two anyway?
Blueshirt wrote on 28/2/24 7:39 am:
Mickmane wrote:
On 27.02.24, Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Isn't Chat-GPT an 'AI' computer program thinkee where you
give it a few basic ideas/suggestion and a required Document
length (i.e. Word count) and IT spits out the end product??
I don't know. I imagine it gets a subject, and then spits out
irrelevant blah.
Are we on about Chat-GPT or Dave?
Hang on .... I've gotta get a coin to toss!!
Mickmane wrote:
On 28.02.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
It's a good hobby, but he should at least investigate why his
spam filters are stopping messages that get peered everywhere
else...
Oddly, this got here. Maybe he did! :)
What's the difference between the two anyway?
There is no reason that any Usenet message - that is not obvious
spam - sent from any service should not get peered through any
specific nntp server beyond possible spam filters - like CleanFeed -
flagging it as a false positive. In this case, it's probably
whatever service you are using as the relevant message was
propagated elsewhere and replied to by people here.
On 28.02.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Mickmane wrote:
What's the difference between the two anyway?
There is no reason that any Usenet message - that is not
obvious spam - sent from any service should not get peered
through any specific nntp server beyond possible spam
filters - like CleanFeed - flagging it as a false positive.
In this case, it's probably whatever service you are using
as the relevant message was propagated elsewhere and replied
to by people here.
I mean on your end, where's the difference between xnews and
indigo?
Mickmane wrote:
I mean on your end, where's the difference between xnews and
indigo?
Short answer in plain language... they are different Usenet
service providers that use different servers. Which means
messages take different routes through loads of smaller systems
as the messages are distributed... each [nntp] server a message
passes through has it's own spam filters, which could
occasionally flag some messages as 'false positives'.
| Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
|---|---|
| Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
| Users: | 7 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 122:45:37 |
| Calls: | 46 |
| Files: | 21,492 |
| Messages: | 64,816 |