• The Lemonade Treatment

    From Agent Jakanov@3:633/280.2 to All on Wed Mar 13 16:28:11 2024
    Which Doctor Who stories would you give the "lemonade treatment"? That
    is, make lemonades out of the lemon, which means to improve the taste or quality, either by rewriting it or making a follow up story that makes
    it look better.

    Here's my list. I'm just listing the stories now, but I might come back
    later to explain how I'd fix each one, if I'm not busy on a secret
    mission. ;-)

    1st Doctor:
    The Space Museum
    Galaxy Four
    The Gunfighters

    2nd Doctor:
    The Underwater Menace
    Fury From the Deep
    The Space Pirates

    3rd Doctor:
    The Mutants
    The Time Monster

    4th Doctor:
    The Hand of Fear
    Underworld
    Nightmare of Eden

    5th Doctor:
    Time-Flight

    6th Doctor:
    The Twin Dilemma
    Timelash

    7th Doctor:
    Delta and the Bannermen
    The Happiness Patrol

    8th Doctor:
    Doctor Who

    9th Doctor:
    Rose

    10th Doctor:
    Fear Her

    11th Doctor:
    Vampires of Venice
    The Wedding of River Song
    THe Power of Three
    Nightmare in Silver

    12th Doctor:
    In the Forest of the Night
    Sleep No More
    The Eaters of Light

    13th Doctor:
    The Battle of Ranskooor Av Kolos
    Orphan 55
    Flux
    Legend of the Sea Devils


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: TWA (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Mich@3:633/280.2 to All on Wed Mar 13 21:51:57 2024
    When Led Zeppelin's Robert Plant sung "squeeze my lemons" everybody
    assumed it was a sexual metaphor. But he said in 2020, that it actually
    was not.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: To protect and to server (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Mickmane@3:633/280.2 to All on Thu Mar 14 05:26:00 2024
    On 13.03.24, Agent Jakanov <mouth@onlegs.org> wrote:

    Which Doctor Who stories would you give the "lemonade treatment"?
    That is, make lemonades out of the lemon, which means to improve the
    taste or quality, either by rewriting it or making a follow up story
    that makes it look better.

    Entire 11th Doctor replaced with a different actor. (And change the
    scene with the stuffing food into stupid face and spitting it back out.)

    I hope AI will one day be able to do that. Could use the face of
    whatshisname Cumberbatch (from Sherlock) for example.

    The absorbalov episode in 10th Doctor, change it to the nonames
    realizing what's happening and beating or capturing the baddie, then
    going on with doing fun things, before anyone gets absorbed. And put
    more Doctor into it.

    I'd put more Doctor into Blink, too. And show what he and Martha have
    been doing with the bow and arrows.

    13th Doctor, make sure everyone knows it's just the Master messing with
    the Doctor with that "regneration coming from other universe kid"
    nonsense.

    I don't have enough other episodes in mind to add more. Maybe upon
    rewatching I'll add some stuff.

    Mind, with Classic, it's generally just charming and cute, for being
    old... I think I'd have more survivors in general, though.

    Oh, I remember something. Blonde curly haired Doctor (6th?) was at times yelling abusively and making the poor companion flinch. Didn't look
    good.

    --

    Mickmane


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: news.kruemel.org (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Mickmane@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Mar 15 02:43:00 2024
    On 14.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Mickmane wrote:

    Oh, I remember something. Blonde curly haired Doctor (6th?)
    was at times yelling abusively and making the poor companion
    flinch. Didn't look good.

    He did more than that! The 6th Doctor tried to strangle Peri and
    then threw her to the floor, that really didn't look good!

    I know, but that was right after the regeneration, when he might not
    have been too sane.

    It was all downhill after that...

    It didn't get too much better, anyway.

    --

    Mickmane


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: news.kruemel.org (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Agent Jakanov@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Mar 16 07:10:59 2024
    "Blueshirt" <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote in news:xn0ojcu1j2dg6b3000 @reader.xsnews.nl:

    Mickmane wrote:

    On 14.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    He did more than that! The 6th Doctor tried to strangle Peri
    and then threw her to the floor, that really didn't look
    good!

    I know, but that was right after the regeneration, when he
    might not have been too sane.

    No other Doctor did it!

    Personally I think it was a mis-step by JNT (the Producer) as
    Peri was well liked and the Doctor trying to strangle her got
    the Sixth Doctor's era off to a bad start. On top of the awful
    coat attacking Peri put me off the Sixth Doctor anyway.

    I can see what they were trying to do with this, but it didn't come across well on screen, especially with the 25-minute format. In one of the behind-the-scenes books I read that Saward and JNT planned a loose story
    arc where something went wrong with the regeneration, possibly because of
    what caused it, or possibly because of what eventually became the Valeyard (they only had a vague idea of it at the time).

    It wasn't that the Doctor almost strangled Peri that was so bad, it was
    that they never followed up or addressed it on screen in any way.




    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: TWA (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Agent Jakanov@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Mar 16 07:29:43 2024
    "Mickmane" <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote in news:G$mX9HaLczB@ATH:


    13th Doctor, make sure everyone knows it's just the Master messing
    with the Doctor with that "regneration coming from other universe
    kid" nonsense.

    This is why I chose Flux to rewrite, to cast (more) doubt on whether the Division and the woman who claims to be Tecteun are just messing with her.

    I also would have reused the villains from "Can You Hear Me?" for Flux, instead of the new ones Chibnall created.





    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: TWA (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Agent Jakanov@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Mar 16 08:00:19 2024
    Agent Jakanov <mouth@onlegs.org> wrote in news:usrdha$pvb1$1@dont-email.me:


    1st Doctor:
    The Space Museum

    The first episode is one of the spookiest in all of Doctor Who history, but the story often gets panned because the rest of the episodes don't hold up
    the suspense, and the supporting characters are not developed at all.

    The Moroks were obviously a metaphor for the British. They once had a vast empire, but now it's apparently in decline. Showing how they had captured
    a Dalek and put its casing in a museum was a nice touch, but I think they should have shown more than that to demonstrate how formidable they once
    were.

    For the Xerons, we need to see more motivation for why they were so
    reluctant to rebel. Many of them looked like teenage boys and young men,
    so maybe they were just trying to impress Vicki.

    Vicki came across as capricious and reckless. This aspect should have been explored, at least a little, although as a product of its time I can see
    why it was promoting revolutions without thinking too much about consequences..


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: TWA (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Agent Jakanov@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Mar 16 10:31:45 2024
    doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:ut2l0m$23gq$4@gallifrey.nk.ca:

    Agent Jakanov <mouth@onlegs.org> wrote:

    It wasn't that the Doctor almost strangled Peri that was so bad, it
    was that they never followed up or addressed it on screen in any way.

    REgen crisis was a bad idea!

    Regeneration crises are almost a tradition in Doctor Who. At least they
    tried to do something different with it, even if the execution was lacking.





    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: TWA (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Agent Jakanov@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Mar 16 10:34:16 2024
    doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:ut2l1u$23gq$5@gallifrey.nk.ca:

    Agent Jakanov <mouth@onlegs.org> wrote:
    "Mickmane" <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote in news:G$mX9HaLczB@ATH:

    13th Doctor, make sure everyone knows it's just the Master messing
    with the Doctor with that "regneration coming from other universe
    kid" nonsense.

    This is why I chose Flux to rewrite, to cast (more) doubt on whether
    the Division and the woman who claims to be Tecteun are just messing
    with her.

    I also would have reused the villains from "Can You Hear Me?" for
    Flux, instead of the new ones Chibnall created.

    no! You need to rewrite the Timeless Child out of the Doctor Who Lore!

    DON'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO!

    If you want a story where the Timeless Child is written out of Doctor WHo, write it yourself. Don't be so lazy and expect everyone else to do your
    work for you.

    Freeloader.






    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: TWA (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Agent Jakanov@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Mar 16 16:06:29 2024
    doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:ut2vhq$q64$1@gallifrey.nk.ca:

    REgen crisis was a bad idea!

    Regeneration crises are almost a tradition in Doctor Who. At least
    they tried to do something different with it, even if the execution
    was lacking.

    They never were until JN-T introduced it!

    Untrue. The 3rd Doctor was incapacitated for a large part of his first
    story. The intro stories for the 5th and 10th Doctors copied this.

    Terrance Dicks own novelization confirmed that the 4th Doctor acted really strange and bonkers for an extended period after his regeneration, although much of it was offscreen, such as his first encounter with Xoanon. The
    11th Doctor's intro copied this.

    The 7th and 8th Doctors were very unsure of who they were for a while.

    The 6th Doctor's regeneration crisis could have been better executed. In a later scene, a parallel was implied between Hugo almost shooting the
    Doctor, thinking he had kidnapped the Twins and destroyed his fleet, and
    the Doctor almost killing Peri, because they both had experienced traumas,
    but the direction of the story does not make it clear.



    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: TWA (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Blueshirt@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Mar 17 01:33:23 2024
    Agent Jakanov wrote:

    doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:

    REgen crisis was a bad idea!

    Regeneration crises are almost a tradition in Doctor Who. At
    least they tried to do something different with it, even if
    the execution was lacking.

    Well, it certainly was different to what other Doctors went
    through post-regeneration.

    Now, if the Fifth Doctor had strangled Adric...

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Eternal-September (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Blueshirt@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Mar 17 01:46:26 2024
    The Doctor wrote:

    In article <ut39cl$2o6lv$1@dont-email.me>,
    Agent Jakanov <mouth@onlegs.org> wrote:
    doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:

    They never were until JN-T introduced it!

    Untrue. The 3rd Doctor was incapacitated for a large part
    of his first story. The intro stories for the 5th and 10th
    Doctors copied this.

    But not unstable!

    In fairness, a regeneration crisis doesn't have to mean
    physically attacking your companion. It's just Saward/JNT
    thought it'd be a good idea for the Sixth Doctor.

    The Third Doctor attacking Liz Shaw would have been unthinkable!

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Eternal-September (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Agent Jakanov@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Mar 17 02:00:32 2024
    doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:ut4aqo$2cr3$6@gallifrey.nk.ca:


    Agent Jakanov <mouth@onlegs.org> wrote:

    Regeneration crises are almost a tradition in Doctor Who. At least >>>>they tried to do something different with it, even if the execution
    was lacking.

    They never were until JN-T introduced it!

    Untrue. The 3rd Doctor was incapacitated for a large part of his
    first story. The intro stories for the 5th and 10th Doctors copied
    this.

    But not unstable!

    IYIO.

    Terrance Dicks own novelization confirmed that the 4th Doctor acted
    really strange and bonkers for an extended period after his
    regeneration, although much of it was offscreen, such as his first >>encounter with Xoanon. The 11th Doctor's intro copied this.

    Oh? The 111th Doctor was trying to get control.

    The 4th Doctor was very conscious when he arose.

    But very unstable. Xoanon is the proof!

    The 7th and 8th Doctors were very unsure of who they were for a while.


    JNT

    8th Doctor was not JNT.

    The 6th Doctor's regeneration crisis could have been better executed.
    In a later scene, a parallel was implied between Hugo almost shooting
    the Doctor, thinking he had kidnapped the Twins and destroyed his
    fleet, and the Doctor almost killing Peri, because they both had >>experienced traumas, but the direction of the story does not make it
    clear.

    JNT

    And Eric Saward. Like I said, I can see they were at least trying to do something interesting and novel with it, in both the long and short
    term.


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: TWA (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Agent Jakanov@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Mar 17 02:14:57 2024
    "Blueshirt" <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote in news:xn0oje88b3sc7t100a@news.eternal-september.org:

    Agent Jakanov wrote:

    Regeneration crises are almost a tradition in Doctor Who. At
    least they tried to do something different with it, even if
    the execution was lacking.

    Well, it certainly was different to what other Doctors went
    through post-regeneration.

    Now, if the Fifth Doctor had strangled Adric...

    Funny you should mention Adric. The Twins in that story reminded me of
    Adric × 2.

    I would also make the twins more interesting and give them an actual
    dilemma.

    Also, try to give more of a clear explanation for why this Doctor was
    acting like an overgrown Adric so often.


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: TWA (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Agent Jakanov@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Mar 17 02:21:08 2024
    "Blueshirt" <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote in news:xn0oje9303tfiug00h@reader.xsnews.nl:

    The Doctor wrote:

    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    Well, it certainly was different to what other Doctors went
    through post-regeneration.

    Now, if the Fifth Doctor had strangled Adric...

    But Tegan and Nysaa might have got in the way.

    If the crisis got so bad that he had to strangle Tegan too...
    <shrugs>

    This is starting to sound like one of those weird M&M fanfics...




    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: TWA (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Agent Jakanov@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Mar 17 03:20:14 2024
    doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:ut4f70$ahs$5 @gallifrey.nk.ca:

    In article <ut4c6f$2uq53$1@dont-email.me>,
    Agent Jakanov <mouth@onlegs.org> wrote:

    Untrue. The 3rd Doctor was incapacitated for a large part of his
    first story. The intro stories for the 5th and 10th Doctors copied >>>>this.

    But not unstable!

    IYIO.

    How were they unstable?

    YMMV.

    Terrance Dicks own novelization confirmed that the 4th Doctor acted >>>>really strange and bonkers for an extended period after his >>>>regeneration, although much of it was offscreen, such as his first >>>>encounter with Xoanon. The 11th Doctor's intro copied this.

    Oh? The 111th Doctor was trying to get control.

    The 4th Doctor was very conscious when he arose.

    But very unstable. Xoanon is the proof!

    When did The Doctor first meet Xoanon?

    One night 'near the beginning of that business with the Giant Robot',
    the Doctor took off in the TARDIS for a little ride; this led him into
    his original adventure with the Mordee and Xoanon. Afterwards, the
    TARDIS returned him to Earth within a few minutes of his departure, [so]
    no one ever knew that he'd been away.'


    The 7th and 8th Doctors were very unsure of who they were for a
    while.

    JNT

    8th Doctor was not JNT.

    But neither were a radical departure.

    So what? Radical departures aren't always bad, as long as they're
    justified on screen.


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: TWA (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Agent Jakanov@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Mar 17 03:59:40 2024
    doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:ut4h61$2iot$2 @gallifrey.nk.ca:

    But not unstable!

    IYIO.

    How were they unstable?

    YMMV.

    The No Comment approach

    It takes one to know one.


    When did The Doctor first meet Xoanon?

    One night 'near the beginning of that business with the Giant Robot',
    the Doctor took off in the TARDIS for a little ride; this led him into
    his original adventure with the Mordee and Xoanon. Afterwards, the
    TARDIS returned him to Earth within a few minutes of his departure,
    [so] no one ever knew that he'd been away.'

    Doubt it!

    Are you calling Terrance Dicks a liar? He wrote 4th Doctor's first
    adventure, as well as the novelization for Face of Evil.


    JNT

    8th Doctor was not JNT.

    But neither were a radical departure.

    So what? Radical departures aren't always bad, as long as they're >>justified on screen.

    IYIO

    Just like your idea that it's always bad is IYIO. So we're at an
    impasse. Agree to disagree.




    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: TWA (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Mickmane@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Mar 17 03:51:00 2024
    On 16.03.24, Agent Jakanov <mouth@onlegs.org> wrote:
    "Mickmane" <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote in news:G$mX9HaLczB@ATH:

    13th Doctor, make sure everyone knows it's just the Master messing
    with the Doctor with that "regneration coming from other universe
    kid" nonsense.

    This is why I chose Flux to rewrite, to cast (more) doubt on whether
    the Division and the woman who claims to be Tecteun are just messing
    with her.

    Hah, that'd work!

    I also would have reused the villains from "Can You Hear Me?" for
    Flux, instead of the new ones Chibnall created.

    Hm, need to get there with rewatching before I know who they are.

    --

    Mickmane


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: news.kruemel.org (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Mickmane@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Mar 17 03:49:00 2024
    On 16.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Mickmane wrote:
    On 14.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Mickmane wrote:

    Oh, I remember something. Blonde curly haired Doctor (6th?)
    was at times yelling abusively and making the poor companion
    flinch. Didn't look good.

    He did more than that! The 6th Doctor tried to strangle Peri
    and then threw her to the floor, that really didn't look
    good!

    I know, but that was right after the regeneration, when he
    might not have been too sane.

    No other Doctor did it!

    Regeneration went between a bit and a lot different every time. :)

    As a one-time bad behaviour with an explanation, it would have been excusable, but unfortunately he kept up the yelling, making poor
    companion flinch.

    Of course, if I could replace the strangling attack, I'd do that, too.
    :)

    Personally I think it was a mis-step by JNT (the Producer) as
    Peri was well liked and the Doctor trying to strangle her got
    the Sixth Doctor's era off to a bad start. On top of the awful
    coat attacking Peri put me off the Sixth Doctor anyway.

    You mean the clown outfit? I thought that was refreshing, or at least
    funny. :)

    --

    Mickmane


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: news.kruemel.org (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Mickmane@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Mar 17 03:56:00 2024
    On 16.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Agent Jakanov wrote:

    Regeneration crises are almost a tradition in Doctor Who. At
    least they tried to do something different with it, even if
    the execution was lacking.

    Well, it certainly was different to what other Doctors went
    through post-regeneration.

    Now, if the Fifth Doctor had strangled Adric...

    Why strangle Adric?

    --

    Mickmane


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: news.kruemel.org (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Agent Jakanov@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Mar 17 04:55:40 2024
    doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:ut4f2g$ahs$1 @gallifrey.nk.ca:

    In article <xn0oje8jx3st04o00c@news.eternal-september.org>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    In fairness, a regeneration crisis doesn't have to mean
    physically attacking your companion. It's just Saward/JNT
    thought it'd be a good idea for the Sixth Doctor.


    IT was a bad idea!

    The Third Doctor attacking Liz Shaw would have been unthinkable!

    Exactly!!

    The difference is, we're stuck with the first one, because it actually happened on screen. So the question becomes, how to we make it more
    palatable by adding more context to it?

    It's fine for the Doctor to be unstable and erratic, but it should have
    been balanced out with more lucid moments. The Doctor should have
    apologized to Peri by the end of the story, even if he didn't fully
    remember what he had done.

    There also should have been some scenes between Peri and another character (such as Hugo) questioning why she tolerates the Doctor's behavior towards her, hinting about her previous abuse and dependency.

    The Doctor was still suffering from the after-effects of the Spectrox
    toxemia. The 5th Doctor sacrificed his life so Peri could live, so
    indirectly that makes her responsible for his death.


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: TWA (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Agent Jakanov@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Mar 17 07:41:20 2024
    "Blueshirt" <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote in news:xn0ojegjy43nyxt003 @reader.xsnews.nl:

    Mickmane wrote:

    On 16.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Agent Jakanov wrote:

    Regeneration crises are almost a tradition in Doctor Who.
    At least they tried to do something different with it, even
    if the execution was lacking.

    Well, it certainly was different to what other Doctors went
    through post-regeneration.

    Now, if the Fifth Doctor had strangled Adric...

    Why strangle Adric?

    Why not? He was more annoying than Peri and JNT thought that was
    a good idea!

    What's the motivation for it, from the writing standpoint? In the case
    of Peri, the Doctor was subconsciously aware that she was indirectly responsible for his previous incarnation's death, and he was triggered
    by her name, which alluded to a supernatural being in Persian mythology
    which was at one time "evil".

    Also, it would have saved time and money on having to arrange a
    space freighter to crash in to Earth just to get rid of him! :-)

    So strangled all the way to death? The idea of the Doctor going all the
    way with Adric is just... wrong.

    That said, it was implied in the very first episode An Unearthly Child
    that Barbara and Ian feared he was child abuser.





    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: TWA (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Agent Jakanov@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Mar 17 07:43:38 2024
    "Blueshirt" <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote in news:xn0ojegdu43f5hg002 @reader.xsnews.nl:

    Mickmane wrote:

    You mean the clown outfit? I thought that was refreshing, or
    at least funny. :)

    I don't think JNT saw it as a "clown outfit", I'm sure he had a
    deeper meaning in mind when he came up with the idea...

    Wow, Doctor Who was so woke back then!

    Were both Adric and the 6th Doctor Mary-Sue characters for JNT?


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: TWA (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Mickmane@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Mar 17 20:57:00 2024
    On 17.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Mickmane wrote:
    On 16.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    Now, if the Fifth Doctor had strangled Adric...

    Why strangle Adric?

    Why not? He was more annoying than Peri and JNT thought that was
    a good idea!

    Peri doesn't really stand out in my memory. I'd have to rewatch to get
    an idea of what she was like.

    (And I already forgot what JNT stands for, some producer/director/
    whatever, but that never really counts with me, I just look at the
    product. :) )

    Also, it would have saved time and money on having to arrange a
    space freighter to crash in to Earth just to get rid of him! :-)

    Lol!

    But then what would have wiped out the dinos?

    --

    Mickmane


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: news.kruemel.org (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From The Last Doctor@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Mar 18 10:16:25 2024
    Agent Jakanov <mouth@onlegs.org> wrote:
    Which Doctor Who stories would you give the "lemonade treatment"? That
    is, make lemonades out of the lemon, which means to improve the taste or quality, either by rewriting it or making a follow up story that makes
    it look better.

    Hindsight is a wonderful thing. We don’t have the pressures that the production team were under - especially in those early days.

    But … in the words of the Disney version of Mary Poppins “Let’s start at the very beginning - it’s a very good place to start”.

    An Unearthly Child. The first episode was fantastic. But the next three -
    meh. It wasn’t a historical story - it was a dull mess of fantasy cavemen. And the Doctor’s characterisation - like that of the Sixth Doctor - was
    very unsympathetic.

    So if I was starting again - An Unearthly Child would lead straight into
    The Daleks. And a bunch of padding would get cut from the scripts for the Daleks - I think we could lose about 2 episodes of time and not miss a
    single meaningful story moment. So in the revised Universe, we’d have the opener followed by a tighter, five episode version of The Daleks. The three “Tribe of Gum” scripts would be redlined and the author told to come back later with a different version of the Fire Makers with less repetition and
    more modern dialogue - pointing out that the TARDIS is translating, and no primitive two word sentences. Give the characters longer names. And do the whole thing in two episodes.



    --
    “The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From The Last Doctor@3:633/280.2 to All on Mon Mar 18 23:30:56 2024
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Last Doctor wrote:

    Hindsight is a wonderful thing. We don’t have the pressures
    that the production team were under - especially in those
    early days.

    The early episodes were of their time, so I'd leave them as they
    were. If I could go back in time though I'd just tell the BBC
    not to wipe or throw away the tins of videotape/film with Doctor
    Who episodes on them!

    Absolutely agreed on the preservation front.

    The 252 episodes of the first four seasons were aired over just 291 weeks
    from 1963-1969 - less than 7 weeks a year without a new episode needed. So
    no wonder the padding was in there - you’d need 50% more stories otherwise, and with even less time to refine and develop each story.

    It was a punishing delivery pace - RTD is planning on giving us the
    equivalent of 18 old size episodes a year, just 40% of what that team had
    to produce.

    But if we’re to make lemonade with our lemons - we need to consider all of our ingredients as lemons.

    --
    “The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Mickmane@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Mar 19 05:04:00 2024
    On 18.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Mickmane wrote:
    On 17.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Mickmane wrote:
    On 16.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    Now, if the Fifth Doctor had strangled Adric...

    Why strangle Adric?

    Why not? He was more annoying than Peri and JNT thought that
    was a good idea!

    Peri doesn't really stand out in my memory. I'd have to
    rewatch to get an idea of what she was like.

    You don't remember Peri?!

    I said she doesn't stand out. So, I know there was a companion named
    Peri, and since you name the one that flinched thus, I assume it's her. That's it.

    I'm sure if you'd seen Peri in "Planet of Fire" she'd have stood
    out!!!

    Names and I... I have to check what happens in that episode... Google mentions her being rescued from drowning, and I remember that and that
    she ended up in the TARDIS after.

    She still doesn't stand out.

    I loved Peri. She was probably the last Doctor Who companion
    that I had a 'thing' for...

    I have not experienced that particular emotion towards any companion. :P

    Also, it would have saved time and money on having to
    arrange a space freighter to crash in to Earth just to get
    rid of him! :-)

    Lol!

    But then what would have wiped out the dinos?

    Oh, I dunno ... maybe an asteroid? ;-)

    How... ordinary! ;P

    --

    Mickmane


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: news.kruemel.org (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From The Last Doctor@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Mar 19 09:57:59 2024
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Last Doctor wrote:

    But if we’re to make lemonade with our lemons - we need to
    consider all of our ingredients as lemons.

    I'd just concentrate on the lemons of Doctor Who 1987-89 to make
    a special recipe lemonade which I'd market as "McCoy's Vintage
    Lemonade" !


    OK - well let’s start at the very beginning there, too.

    Number one : fire John Nathan-Turner and hire Chris Boucher as producer and Graeme Harper as director. (I know - Boucher was a writer, but he is here freshly off the frustration of watching Star Cops not go quite the way he envisaged, and is in a would be producer mindset). Tell them Doctor Who in
    the mode of Star Cops is exactly what we’re aiming for.

    Number two: don’t hire Keff McCulloch for the music. Instead hire the
    master of TV scores of the 70s and 80s - Jeff Wayne. (Yes, he of War of the Worlds).

    To begin with, keep the title sequence from Colin Baker’s second season to maintain continuity. And because he’s going to be in the first episode
    (will explain to him that JN-T and the reception of the last season mean we have to go in another direction - but we’d like to have him back soon for a multi Doctor episode).

    The Rani’s opening salvo fails and she curses because she “wants them both”.

    So: the Sixth Doctor and Mel land safely on Lakertya after the Rani’s
    strike - with Mel working the controls confidently just as much as the
    Doctor - and there is some banter about how they had to untangle their lifelines so that they met in the right order. Mel uses computing metaphors
    - the trial was a subroutine that they had to loop back from - etc. Make it clear how intelligent and versatile she is.

    They head out from the TARDIS but despite Mel’s warnings for him to be careful, the Doctor’s arrogant insouciance leads him to set off a trap and
    he soars off in a bubble - only to crash into a mountainside and tumble
    down a thousand feet of cliff face. It’s regeneration time. Hello
    Sylvester.

    —- principal differences in this treatment

    —- the Rani is rational and at no time pretends to be Mel. She pretends to have Mel locked up as leverage to get the Doctor to help her. The Doctor isn’t fooled for a minute and secretly sabotages her TARDIS and her experiments.

    —- Both Kate and Sylv are told to take it seriously and not ham it up.

    —- Mel is considered intellectually superior - and shows it - and is one of the Rani’s chosen subjects for the experiment.

    —- The experiment is to build an AI capable of original thought and outperforming the Gallifreyan Matrix, predicting and marking fixed and malleable key points in time. Not to grow an enormous rubber brain and
    explode an asteroid to create Helium 2.

    — The comic aspects of the dialogue should be reduced by about 99%.

    (This story requires so much rewriting to not make it an irredeemable pile
    of shit …. Ah well. Make the rest up yourselves.)

    —- The same (previous season’s) title sequence is retained for the rest of this season, from episode 2 of this serial - but we get a serious,
    mysterious shot of Sylv’s face. No silver paint. No cheeky wink. And no crappy logo that even the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation would have
    rejected.

    --
    “The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From The Last Doctor@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Mar 19 21:06:22 2024
    Hi Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    The Last Doctor wrote on 18/3/24 11:30 pm:
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Last Doctor wrote:

    Hindsight is a wonderful thing. We don’t have the pressures that
    the production team were under - especially in those early days.

    The early episodes were of their time, so I'd leave them as they
    were. If I could go back in time though I'd just tell the BBC not
    to wipe or throw away the tins of videotape/film with Doctor Who
    episodes on them!

    Absolutely agreed on the preservation front.

    The 252 episodes of the first four seasons were aired over just 291
    weeks from 1963-1969 - less than 7 weeks a year without a new episode
    needed. So no wonder the padding was in there - you’d need 50% more
    stories otherwise, and with even less time to refine and develop each
    story.

    It was a punishing delivery pace

    Did Coronation St keep up such a punishing pace back then ..... or did
    they that a couple of months off each year??

    Coronation Street ran twice a week without a break from 1963 to 1989 and actually increased to 3 times in 1989 then 4 from 1996, with occasional
    extra events adding additional special episodes - and is now running at 6 episodes a week (this did drop to 3 for a while during the coronavirus epidemic).

    The key differences are a set of static sets and costumes that can be
    bought off the peg in shops, far fewer special effects, focus on a regular
    cast with few guest stars, long running interwoven plotlines featuring different groups of cast members and of course a large writers room, which needs to create engaging interpersonal storylines that blend together
    rather than being independently written - but not much truly new or
    creative. Due to being able to switch emphasis like that, significant
    numbers of cast and crew can take holidays without the show having to take
    a break.

    A soap is a very different beast from an episodic science fiction show, no matter what Aggie claims about modern Who.

    --
    “The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Blueshirt@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Mar 19 21:16:45 2024
    Mickmane wrote:

    On 18.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    I'm sure if you'd seen Peri in "Planet of Fire" she'd have
    stood out!!!

    Names and I... I have to check what happens in that episode...
    Google mentions her being rescued from drowning, and I
    remember that and that she ended up in the TARDIS after.

    She still doesn't stand out.

    Peri had a couple of good points.

    I loved Peri. She was probably the last Doctor Who companion
    that I had a 'thing' for...

    I have not experienced that particular emotion towards any
    companion. :P

    Neither have I for the last few decades...

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Eternal-September (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From The Last Doctor@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Mar 19 21:35:15 2024
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Mickmane wrote:

    On 18.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    I'm sure if you'd seen Peri in "Planet of Fire" she'd have
    stood out!!!

    Names and I... I have to check what happens in that episode...
    Google mentions her being rescued from drowning, and I
    remember that and that she ended up in the TARDIS after.

    She still doesn't stand out.

    Peri had a couple of good points.

    Oooh, Matron!

    Carry On, Doctor!


    I loved Peri. She was probably the last Doctor Who companion
    that I had a 'thing' for...

    I have not experienced that particular emotion towards any
    companion. :P

    Neither have I for the last few decades...

    --
    “The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From The Last Doctor@3:633/280.2 to All on Wed Mar 20 02:13:29 2024
    The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
    In article <utbo2u$p24n$1@dont-email.me>,
    The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:

    A soap is a very different beast from an episodic science fiction show, no >> matter what Aggie claims about modern Who.


    Well depends on who is more popular.

    Actually, Dave, popularity has absolutely no bearing on how similar a
    mundane soap opera is to a fantastical science fantasy odyssey, in terms of production needs.

    --
    “The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)