"Racist"? Weren?t you saying previously that the show
was "woke"?
Lawrence DOliveiro wrote:
"Racist"? Weren?t you saying previously that the show
was "woke"?
In fairness, those two words are the standard insults of
today, and most of the people using those terms are just
throwing them around willy-nilly.
?Racist?? Weren?t you saying previously that the show was ?woke??
In fairness, those two words are the standard insults of today, and
most of the people using those terms are just throwing them around willy-nilly.
On Thu, 3 Sep 2026 10:32:53 +0100, Blueshirt wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2026 21:48:50 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D?Oliveiro
wrote:
?Racist?? Weren?t you saying previously that the show was
?woke??
In fairness, those two words are the standard insults of
today, and most of the people using those terms are just
throwing them around willy-nilly.
But they?re kind of insults in opposite directions, are they
not?
?Racist?? Weren?t you saying previously that the show was ?woke??
Nerdrotic Daily examines the third episode of Lanterns, focusing on the >origin story of John Stewart. The discussion covers the narrative
structure, character development, and the integration of specific social >themes within the DCU's latest streaming project.
https://youtu.be/BvRs83rzMxM?si=airz-JiR-F3-T_Mc
"Racist"? Weren't you saying previously that the show
was "woke"?
Nerdrotic Daily examines the third episode of Lanterns, focusing on the >origin story of John Stewart. The discussion covers the narrative
structure, character development, and the integration of specific social >themes within the DCU's latest streaming project.
https://youtu.be/BvRs83rzMxM?si=airz-JiR-F3-T_Mc
weberm@polaris.net wrote:
Nerdrotic Daily examines the third episode of Lanterns, focusing on the >>origin story of John Stewart. The discussion covers the narrative >>structure, character development, and the integration of specific social >>themes within the DCU's latest streaming project.
https://youtu.be/BvRs83rzMxM?si=airz-JiR-F3-T_Mc
"Racist"? Weren?t you saying previously that the show was ?woke??
On Wed, 2 Sep 2026 21:48:50 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D?Oliveiro wrote:
?Racist?? Weren?t you saying previously that the show was ?woke??
You do uinderstand those aren't mutually exclusive, right?
On Wed, 2 Sep 2026 21:48:50 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D?Oliveiro wrote:
"Racist"? Weren?t you saying previously that the show was "woke"?
You do uinderstand those aren't mutually exclusive, right?
On Sun, 06 Sep 2026 20:58:28 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2026 21:48:50 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D?Oliveiro wrote:
"Racist"? Weren?t you saying previously that the show was "woke"?
You do uinderstand those aren't mutually exclusive, right?
But they?re kind of insults in opposite directions, are they not?
On Mon, 7 Sep 2026 02:48:28 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D?Oliveiro wrote:
On Sun, 06 Sep 2026 20:58:28 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2026 21:48:50 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D?Oliveiro
wrote:
?Racist?? Weren?t you saying previously that the show was ?woke??
You do uinderstand those aren't mutually exclusive, right?
But they?re kind of insults in opposite directions, are they not?
Not necessarily.
On Tue, 08 Sep 2026 04:30:43 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:
On Mon, 7 Sep 2026 02:48:28 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D?Oliveiro wrote:
On Sun, 06 Sep 2026 20:58:28 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2026 21:48:50 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D?Oliveiro
wrote:
?Racist?? Weren?t you saying previously that the show was
?woke??
You do uinderstand those aren't mutually exclusive, right?
But they?re kind of insults in opposite directions, are they not?
Not necessarily.
Isn?t ?racist? a ?woke? term? And conversely, aren?t those who
accuse
others of being ?racist? often derided in some way for being ?woke??
Unless you?re trying to say that it?s ?woke? to be ?racist?, or
?racist? to be ?woke?, or something ...
| Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
|---|---|
| Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
| Users: | 9 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 78:19:28 |
| Calls: | 220 |
| Files: | 21,513 |
| Messages: | 85,694 |