Someone help me out!
Star Beast had more action then intrigue.
WBY loks more Midnightish than interesting.
How come Star Beast ranges a 7 on IMDB yet WBY ranges an 8 ?
Am I missing something?
In article <1652039105.723484367.305585.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
Someone help me out!
Star Beast had more action then intrigue.
WBY loks more Midnightish than interesting.
How come Star Beast ranges a 7 on IMDB yet WBY ranges an 8 ?
Am I missing something?
Yes. Each of them is rated nine points too high!
IYIO.
Someone help me out!
Star Beast had more action then intrigue.
WBY loks more Midnightish than interesting.
How come Star Beast ranges a 7 on IMDB yet WBY ranges an 8 ?
Am I missing something?
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <1652039105.723484367.305585.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
Someone help me out!
Star Beast had more action then intrigue.
WBY loks more Midnightish than interesting.
How come Star Beast ranges a 7 on IMDB yet WBY ranges an 8 ?
Am I missing something?
Yes. Each of them is rated nine points too high!
IYIO.
The Star Beast was familiar RTD territory - other than the need to resolve the Doctor-Donna problem, it was an absolutely typical RTD fluff special episode. Fun but not deep. It just won bonus points by comparison with most of the past few years.
Wild Blue Yonder was /different/. Not brilliant and not given enough plot
to fill its hour - but it was science fiction. When was tha last time
Doctor Who had an episode built around a single, genuinely SF concept?
Aggie should have been applauding from the sidelines, but sadly his
fascistic obsession with race and colour over a marginal cameo led him off into an insane rant of “woke degeneracy”.
Personally I didn’t think Wild Blue Yonder was better entertainment overall than The Star Beast, but that final delightful swan song for Bernard
Cribbins was pure gold and worth 2 points on its own.
So 9/10 for me twice in a row. I don’t expect brilliance from Doctor Who so I’m happy for it to be fun and coherent - factors that were somewhat lacking in the Whittaker era.
Capaldi’s run managed it in Series 10 but 8 and 9 largely lacked coherence.
Almost nothing in the modern show, of course, has been as incoherent or joyless as Sylvester McCoy’s TV tenure.
Now I’m off to listen to “Audacity” so that I’m ready for the 8th Doctor’s
new Christmas audio box set “In the Bleak Midwinter” which was released today.
On 05/12/2023 18:17, Squealer wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
Someone help me out!
Star Beast had more action then intrigue.
WBY loks more Midnightish than interesting.
How come Star Beast ranges a 7 on IMDB yet WBY ranges an 8 ?
Am I missing something?
Yes. Each of them is rated nine points too high!
IYIO.
The Star Beast was familiar RTD territory - other than the need to resolve >> the Doctor-Donna problem, it was an absolutely typical RTD fluff special
episode. Fun but not deep. It just won bonus points by comparison with
most of the past few years.
Wild Blue Yonder was /different/. Not brilliant and not given enough plot
to fill its hour - but it was science fiction. When was tha last time
Doctor Who had an episode built around a single, genuinely SF concept?
Aggie should have been applauding from the sidelines, but sadly his
fascistic obsession with race and colour over a marginal cameo led him off >> into an insane rant of “woke degeneracy”.
So claims Squealer the epitome of the Nazi chief propagandist Joseph >Goebbels.
Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
---|---|
Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
Users: | 7 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 153:58:51 |
Calls: | 46 |
Files: | 21,492 |
Messages: | 65,456 |