1. Forum
  2. Fidonet
  3. REC.ARTS.SF.TV

  • Re: Retcon the Timeless Child

    From The Last Doctor@3:633/280.2 to All on Thu Dec 7 05:48:31 2023
    The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/SpitzDoctorWhoGroup/posts/10160656656562771/

    I can’t see that post or its comments. That’s a private group that looks like it’s pretending to be the official “Doctor Who” group Dave. I’m not
    applying to join a group that is faking authenticity and hiding its discussions. Recipe for a hate group right there.

    https://m.imdb.com/title/tt9361046/reviews?sort=userRating&dir=desc

    Fixed your link, for some reason your version was starting at the very
    bottom end of the reviews … the episode had 6k ratings for an average of
    5.2 stars (yes, it was divisive) but 121 of 276 reviews (only 2.5% of
    raters places a review) are 1 star - which just reflects the fact that far
    more people who dislike a thing write to criticise than those who like it
    write to praise it … and maybe you should get a chance to read some other views before getting bored with dozens of essentially identical hate
    reviews …

    --
    “The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Travoltron@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 16 19:21:20 2023
    On 12/6/2023 10:48 AM, The Last Doctor wrote:
    I can’t see that post or its comments. That’s a private group that looks
    like it’s pretending to be the official “Doctor Who” group Dave. I’m not
    applying to join a group that is faking authenticity and hiding its discussions. Recipe for a hate group right there.

    What a coward you are.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From The Last Doctor@3:633/280.2 to All on Sat Dec 16 21:28:46 2023
    Travoltron <Travoltron@fakeemail.com> wrote:
    On 12/6/2023 10:48 AM, The Last Doctor wrote:
    I can’t see that post or its comments. That’s a private group that looks >> like it’s pretending to be the official “Doctor Who” group Dave. I’m not
    applying to join a group that is faking authenticity and hiding its
    discussions. Recipe for a hate group right there.

    What a coward you are.


    If that group changes its public identity from “Doctor Who” to something that makes is clear it isn’t the official forum of Doctor Who, and opens up its posts to be read so that a reasonable decision can be made as to
    whether it’s a community I’d like to engage with, then I can decide.

    Meanwhile Dave would be welcome to copy-paste some of the content so that
    we can see what is being discussed. Why on Earth would any sensible person want to validate a group that hides its identity and its discussions by
    trying to join it?

    Meaningless accusations of cowardice are just trolling.

    --
    “The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)