A Friend <A Friend> wrote:
tmc1982@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/threads/channel-drift.751516/
What was the reason(s) for a channel such as MTV or SyFy to drift
away from its original channel model and direction?
In MTV's case, nobody was making videos anymore. They were too
expensive and didn't affect music sales.
SyFy has always been a mess, even back when it was the Buck Rogers
Channel.
Some of my favorite SF programs were on USA. The better stuff on Syfy
was usually foreign programming.
In article <nb4m1f$jv6t$1@dont-email.me>, ahk@chinet.com wrote:
A Friend <A Friend> wrote:
tmc1982@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/threads/channel-drift.751516/
What was the reason(s) for a channel such as MTV or SyFy to drift
away from its original channel model and direction?
In MTV's case, nobody was making videos anymore. They were too
expensive and didn't affect music sales.
SyFy has always been a mess, even back when it was the Buck Rogers >>>Channel.
Some of my favorite SF programs were on USA. The better stuff on Syfy
was usually foreign programming.
Lexx will always be a fav of mine.
ahk@chinet.com wrote:
A Friend wrote:
tmc1982@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/threads/channel-drift.751516/
What was the reason(s) for a channel such as MTV or SyFy to drift
away from its original channel model and direction?
In MTV's case, nobody was making videos anymore. They were too
expensive and didn't affect music sales.
SyFy has always been a mess, even back when it was the Buck Rogers >>>Channel.
Some of my favorite SF programs were on USA. The better stuff on Syfy
was usually foreign programming.
Lexx will always be a fav of mine.
Giganews has allowed Ubi to forge other Usenet users for years and to
inject articles that violate standards such as these with the pre-loaded Injection headers. I don't know why they didn't stop Ubi years ago. They ignore all abuse reports.
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
ahk@chinet.com wrote:
A Friend wrote:
tmc1982@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/threads/channel-drift.751516/
What was the reason(s) for a channel such as MTV or SyFy to drift
away from its original channel model and direction?
In MTV's case, nobody was making videos anymore. They were too
expensive and didn't affect music sales.
SyFy has always been a mess, even back when it was the Buck Rogers
Channel.
Some of my favorite SF programs were on USA. The better stuff on Syfy
was usually foreign programming.
Lexx will always be a fav of mine.
It's not my place to tell Usenet users whom to associate with and whose articles to post followups to. I will point out further antics from
Ubi the Shithead. You can decide for yourself if continuing to post
followups to Ubi is troll feeding and if he's truly your friend.
In this thread,
Subject: Channel Drift
I had posted an article.
Message-ID: <tb4m1f$jv6t$1@dont-email.me>
I didn't crosspost. I didn't set Followup-To. Anyone on Usenet who knows
me is well aware that I almost never do either, especially not in a
thread in which the crossposting and setting of Followup-To is due to Ubi-the-shithead's antics and not the author of the root article in the thread.
Ubi forged an article from me once again.
Message-ID: <nb4m1f$jv6t$1@dont-email.me>
Note that the two Message IDs are off by one character.
One may create one's own Message IDs in the newsreader. I don't do that.
I allow eternal september to create them for me. If the user creates his
own Message ID, it must be in valid syntax and unique and MUST NOT forge
an association with another domain. Ray Banana, the News administrator
of eternal-september, registered that domain. Ubi MUST NOT use it.
In Ubi's forgery, the article is crossposted but Ubi the shithead is
quite stupid and included a newsgroup that doesn't exist. He then set Followup-To crossposted to four newsgroups.
He also preloaded the Injection headers to pretend the article was still
the one posted through eternal-september instead of Giganews.
Giganews has allowed Ubi to forge other Usenet users for years and to
inject articles that violate standards such as these with the pre-loaded Injection headers. I don't know why they didn't stop Ubi years ago. They ignore all abuse reports.
You may wonder why all these articles these threads exist in rec.arts.tv
at all. They were started by a common author, the Usenet shill.
From: Terrence Clay <tmc1982@gmail.com>
fwiw, Terrence doesn't post his own content and nearly never
participates in discussion except to deny shilling, but Terrence does
not crosspost. From the root article:
Message-ID: <457617d0-989a-4348-8bbf-11c6e45d03den@googlegroups.com> Newsgroups: alt.tv.mtv
Ubi forged Terrence Clay and crossposted. We can read Ubi's forgery in rec.arts.tv but not the precursor article without reading it in
alt.tv.mtv.
Message-ID: <n457617d0-989a-4348-8bbf-11c6e45d03den@googlegroups.com> Newsgroups: alt.tv.mtv,alt.tv.scifi.channel,rec.arts.tv
Ubi is no one's friend. He's a troll. He forges. His forgeries tend to violate Usenet syntax in a serious manner desiged to prevent forgeries,
so it's all Abuse of Usenet that really should get Ubi TOSsed from every Usenet server he uses, but it doesn't.
Just because Giganews allows Ubi to get away with this behavior doesn't
mean you should. Don't post followups to Ubi's forgeries ever. Don't
post followups to articles Ubi posts that aren't forgeries. Just deny
him the attention he craves so desperately.
A Friend <A Friend> wrote:
In article <n457617d0-989a-4348-8bbf-11c6e45d03den@googlegroups.com>, >><tmc1982@gmail.com> wrote:
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/threads/channel-drift.751516/
What was the reason(s) for a channel such as MTV or SyFy to drift
away from its original channel model and direction?
In MTV's case, nobody was making videos anymore. They were too
expensive and didn't affect music sales.
SyFy has always been a mess, even back when it was the Buck Rogers
Channel.
Some of my favorite SF programs were on USA. The better stuff on Syfy
was usually foreign programming.
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
ahk@chinet.com wrote:
A Friend wrote:
tmc1982@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/threads/channel-drift.751516/
What was the reason(s) for a channel such as MTV or SyFy to drift
away from its original channel model and direction?
In MTV's case, nobody was making videos anymore. They were too
expensive and didn't affect music sales.
SyFy has always been a mess, even back when it was the Buck Rogers
Channel.
Some of my favorite SF programs were on USA. The better stuff on Syfy
was usually foreign programming.
Lexx will always be a fav of mine.
It's not my place to tell Usenet users whom to associate with and whose >articles to post followups to. I will point out further antics from
Ubi the Shithead. You can decide for yourself if continuing to post
followups to Ubi is troll feeding and if he's truly your friend.
I KF'd him a while back.
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
In article <nb4m1f$jv6t$1@dont-email.me>, ahk@chinet.com wrote:
A Friend <A Friend> wrote:
tmc1982@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/threads/channel-drift.751516/
What was the reason(s) for a channel such as MTV or SyFy to drift
away from its original channel model and direction?
In MTV's case, nobody was making videos anymore. They were too >>>>expensive and didn't affect music sales.
SyFy has always been a mess, even back when it was the Buck Rogers >>>>Channel.
Some of my favorite SF programs were on USA. The better stuff on Syfy
was usually foreign programming.
Lexx will always be a fav of mine.
May His Shadow fall upon you.
I KF'd him a while back.
ahk@chinet.com wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
ahk@chinet.com wrote:
A Friend wrote:
tmc1982@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/threads/channel-drift.751516/
What was the reason(s) for a channel such as MTV or SyFy to drift >>>>>>away from its original channel model and direction?
In MTV's case, nobody was making videos anymore. They were too >>>>>expensive and didn't affect music sales.
SyFy has always been a mess, even back when it was the Buck Rogers >>>>>Channel.
Some of my favorite SF programs were on USA. The better stuff on Syfy >>>>was usually foreign programming.
Lexx will always be a fav of mine.
It's not my place to tell Usenet users whom to associate with and whose >>articles to post followups to. I will point out further antics from
Ubi the Shithead. You can decide for yourself if continuing to post >>followups to Ubi is troll feeding and if he's truly your friend.
[Paranoid hysterical conspiratorial rantings deleted]
Trolling? That's pretty funny, coming from you!
(I am pretty sure you have claimed to have killfiled me on multiple >occassions, including the time I offered condolences for your dog.)
[Kerman's incorrect formatting fixed.]
| Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
|---|---|
| Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
| Users: | 7 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 150:42:25 |
| Calls: | 46 |
| Files: | 21,492 |
| Messages: | 65,402 |