• Re: 10 Sci-Fi Shows That Aged Poorly - Regardless of the cult followin

    From anim8rfsk@3:633/280.2 to All on Wed Sep 21 14:45:39 2022
    Subject: Re: 10 Sci-Fi Shows That Aged Poorly - Regardless of the
    cult following, some sci-fi series have not stood the test of time.

    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
    In mainstream media, sci-fi shows tend to take a backseat to classic
    sitcoms and profoundly popular dramas. Despite this, the sci-fi genre
    has a wildly loyal community, defending most borderline-cringe plots. Regardless of the cult following, some sci-fi series have not stood the
    test of time.

    While sitcoms get berated for distasteful jokes that don't align with
    the values of today's political climate, sci-fi shows are more so at
    risk of not looking as cool as before. When battling aliens, "looking
    cool" is an essential factor that adds to its authenticity. So, when
    viewers rewatch classics from decades ago, the low production value
    often becomes a topic of harsh criticism in the niche community.


    I don’t know what happened to CBR. They used to be interesting at least.
    The last couple of years they seem to be farming out their articles to
    deeply stupid people. Let’s see what they’ve done this time.



    10 Four Seasons Of Heroes Is Generous (Heroes)

    During its prime, Heroes did surprisingly well. A disparate group of
    randoms worldwide obtain superpowers for the very first time. Albeit sounding corny now, 2006 was raving about the premise. However, with
    Marvel producing all things superhero every other week, the rest of the entertainment industry pursuing anything remotely similar never stands
    a chance.

    Sporadically throwing in plot twists and ending seemingly every episode
    on cliffhangers wasn't enough for Heroes to keep afloat. By today's
    standard of superhero shows, anything without decades of comic book
    history supporting them is deemed unworthy of success.


    HEROES didn’t age badly; it wasn’t any good right from the Pilot episode which is where I stopped watching.


    9 Lost Should Get Lost (Lost)

    Lost is the poster child for lack of proper planning. When
    storyboarding any story, it's crucial to consider how the worldbuilding
    will progress as naturally as possible. However, with how eccentric the premise of Lost already was, finding a naturally developing story progression is a feat.

    Towards the end of Lost, it becomes increasingly clear that the
    creators never had a plan. Throwing in random anecdotes like polar
    bears on a stranded, tropical island is as fascinating as Lost gets. As compelling as the original synopsis was, the series ran its course. No
    one wishes for a Lost revival any time soon.

    LOST fell apart halfway through the series, which the article mentions. So I’m not sure how that classifies as “aged badly“



    8 Star Trek Is A Classic Despite The Run-Down Production (Star Trek:
    The Next Generation)

    Star Trek is undoubtedly sci-fi royalty. Cult following aside, Star
    Trek: The Next Generation stands by some timeless values that align
    with today's inclusive political ideals. It makes several attempts at diversity and gender equality. Disregarding how these pertinent issues
    are addressed and reflected in the dialogue, for the '60s, the show
    made a solid attempt at standing on compassionate and harmonious
    grounds.

    Star Trek: The Next Generation mostly ages in terms of its actual production. From hairstyles to amateur lighting, the series' overall aesthetic is incredibly outdated. Combined with stiff acting and slow pacing, Star Trek: The Next Generation may be part of a classic, but by
    no means has it aged well as a series.

    STAR TREK TNG was rotten right from the pilot all the way to data versus
    the space Mayans and including its movies. The person writing this article
    is an idiot. My viewing accomplice said after encounter at Farpoint that
    if this mess was called Battlestar Galactica the next generation we
    wouldn’t have tuned in for episode two.



    7 Inhumans.
    Many shows and movies have proven that the Marvel name doesn't
    guarantee anything but epic CGI. This is why it speaks to how horrid Inhumans is — they don't even have that going for them.

    Inhumans started aging horribly before it was even released. Originally marketed as a movie, the first two episodes of the eight-episode series
    were screened on IMAX and received monumental negative reviews from
    critics and audiences. Being one of Jack Kirby's most significant
    works, Inhumans had a lot going for it. Yet, its delivery disappointed
    even the most hardcore Marvel fans. Conning it an X-Men knockoff,
    Inhumans had mediocre production value and cringe dialogue, downgrading
    an otherwise cool concept in the Marvel Universe.

    INHUMANS
    OMG! Inhumans collapsed during the first episode! How can something that
    was terrible to start with age poorly? And I love the Inhumans in the
    comics. But the first thing they did was decide they couldn’t afford the effects and so they moved everybody off screen. Shaved medusa‘s head. Lost the lockjaw.



    6 Conspiracy Theorists Are Now Internet Trolls (X-Files)

    Once upon a time, conspiracy theorists took center stage in the media instead of hiding under endless Reddit threads in the deepest, darkest corners of the internet. By reputation of mythology alone, X-Files has
    aged poorly.

    When a series runs for 11 seasons, transcending decades into a new millennium, aging poorly is entirely understandable. From 1993 to 2018, X-Files fans have watched countless weekly monsters flop. Alternating between the good and the bad, X-Files has had polarizing reviews.
    Overall it has aged poorly, especially with the innumerable X-Files
    variants the world has seen since its release.


    X FILES ran out of steam halfway through. I’ve never even seen a lot of the later episodes.



    5 The 100 Is Australia (The 100)

    Unofficially paying homage to Australia's convict past, The 100 sends
    100 juvenile convicts to planet Earth decades after its devastation.
    While initially raking in positive reviews left and right, the hype
    around the once-intriguing premise died out fairly quickly.

    After the second season, the plot went rather bonkers. Killing off
    beloved characters for insufficient reasons and adding filler plot
    points stalled the story's pacing. The 100 may have redeemed themselves
    in a couple of their following seasons, but Season 7's controversial premiere finally ended the show's declining reputation once and for
    all.

    The 100 was rotten from the start. Right down to the fact that there never were 100 convicts. Idiots. A show only Ian James Ball could love.



    4 Westworld.

    Series prolonging its inevitable end is a common epidemic in Hollywood.
    Many deem Westworld's first season as some of the best pilot seasons television has ever seen. A classic case of robots taking over the
    world, the futuristic amusement park falls victim to machines gaining sentience. This compelling premise was delivered beautifully in the
    first season, but the same could not be said for the two that supersede
    it.

    With complex worldbuilding and riveting action sequences, Westworld set itself up for failure by putting the bar so high with its first season. Their attempt at unveiling their plot twist in Season 2 didn't live up
    to the immensely suspenseful setup in the prior season.
    Overcompensating for Season 2's convoluted approach, Season 3 fell flat
    in plot progression and was overly cynical for no apparent reason.


    Westworld is still in production for God sakes! It augured in in season two when they switchEd show runners.



    3 Primeval.

    Like Westworld and many, many more in Hollywood, Primeval outlived its expiry date. Time-twisting related plots always have captivating
    synopses. Primeval follows a group of eccentric government officials battling time-bending anomalies from across the infinite timeline.

    Unlike Westworld, Primeval had more than just one good season. Doubling
    that number, Primeval only started progressively declining during its controversial third season. Frankly, any show audacious enough to kill
    off its main character is at risk of aging poorly. Unsurprisingly, the demise of the main protagonist buries multiple unanswered story arcs. Somehow, the show continues for two seasons following Nick Cutter's
    death. Without anything enticing enough for the audience to stick
    around, Primeval started aging poorly before the series ended.


    PRIMEVAL kept dribbling out new stuff for a long time but I’m glad they did because they actually wrapped everything up.


    2 The World Is No Stranger To The Multiverse (Sliders)

    When Sliders first debuted in 1995, the multiverse introduction had the audience quaking. Exploring every possible corner of the multiverse,
    the group of four jumps from one Earth to another. Some only varied
    slightly to Earth Prime, but others featured the USSR being the
    dominant empire and spider-wasp hybrids slowly killing off the human
    race.

    Somewhere along the line, Sliders' creators started taking a darker
    approach to their adventures. Dabbling in the horror genre and adding
    aliens into the mix muddled the series. Despite the creativity, the
    change in direction ruined the once-riveting series. Especially now,
    with the MCU and the Arrowverse taking center stage in the media,
    Sliders looks like a confusing and amateur predecessor.


    SLIDERS crashed and burned when they lost Sabrina Lloyd.


    1 Stargate SG-1 Was Dethroned For Low Production Value (Stargate SG-1)

    Stargate SG-1 had immense popularity and success when it came out in
    '97. It was a powerhouse on Showtime and overwhelmingly raked in
    viewers when MGM and the premium cable network invested big money into
    the program.

    However, their time under the sun was abruptly cut short with Richard
    Dean Anderson's leave at the end of Season 8. There was a shift in
    character development and plot progression. Although longtime fans
    stuck around for the sake of their loyalty to the show, the passion
    they once had for Stargate SG-1 was long gone. With how much technology
    has progressed and the film industry has evolved, Stargate SG-1 no
    longer has the same allure. Not even nostalgia can salvage what once
    seemed revolutionary and has degraded into an amateur-looking motion picture.

    STARGATE SG1 did lose its way, but not when Jack left entirely but when he became goofy Jack. The last two seasons, STARGATE FG 1 (the “FG“ stands for: FARGATE!) Are different but not bad in any way. In fact some of the
    best work is there, right down too and definitely including the finale CONTINUUM. Now what sucks is Stargate SGA Atlantis. What sucks worse is Stargate SGU universe. What sucks worse is Stargate SG O origins. O my God does origins suck. I don’t think I can possibly express how badly origins sucks.

    So whoever or whatever wrote this (when you use a non-standard single word
    as your bio name and no picture you really need to include your pronouns)
    just got it all wrong right from the premise. They didn’t manage to come up with one show that seemed good at the time and that you were embarrassed to watch a rerun of now.

    How about season two of lost in space?





    --
    Let's go Brandon!





    --
    The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Easynews - www.easynews.com (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@3:633/280.2 to All on Wed Sep 21 23:35:03 2022
    Subject: Re: 10 Sci-Fi Shows That Aged Poorly - Regardless of the
    cult following, some sci-fi series have not stood the test of time.

    anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:

    . . .

    STARGATE SG1 did lose its way, but not when Jack left entirely but when he >became goofy Jack. The last two seasons, STARGATE FG 1 (the "FG" stands
    for: FARGATE!) Are different but not bad in any way. In fact some of the
    best work is there, right down too and definitely including the finale >CONTINUUM.

    What didn't work at all was they finally defeated the Go'a'uld but began
    facing a different enemy with plots that were way too similar. I still
    hated the Replicators.

    . . .

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From anim8rfsk@3:633/280.2 to All on Thu Sep 22 00:59:00 2022
    Subject: Re: 10 Sci-Fi Shows That Aged Poorly - Regardless of the
    cult following, some sci-fi series have not stood the test of time.

    Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
    anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:

    . . .

    STARGATE SG1 did lose its way, but not when Jack left entirely but when he >> became goofy Jack. The last two seasons, STARGATE FG 1 (the "FG" stands
    for: FARGATE!) Are different but not bad in any way. In fact some of the
    best work is there, right down too and definitely including the finale
    CONTINUUM.

    What didn't work at all was they finally defeated the Go'a'uld but began facing a different enemy with plots that were way too similar. I still
    hated the Replicators.

    Yeah it was like Star Trek trading the Romulans for the Klingons or Tom
    Swift defeating the Brungarians just to have the Kranjovians raise their
    ugly heads. Basically distinctions without differences.



    . . .




    --
    The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Easynews - www.easynews.com (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Sep 23 01:41:52 2022
    Subject: Re: 10 Sci-Fi Shows That Aged Poorly - Regardless of the cult
    following, some sci-fi series have not stood the test of time.

    On 9/20/2022 5:34 PM, Madlove wrote:
    On 09/20/2022 08:52 PM, Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha wrote:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote in
    news:3DKdnQwU-64Porf-nZ2dnZfqn_Vj4p2d@giganews.com:

    In mainstream media, sci-fi shows tend to take a backseat to
    classic sitcoms and profoundly popular dramas. Despite this, the
    sci-fi genre has a wildly loyal community, defending most
    borderline-cringe plots. Regardless of the cult following, some
    sci-fi series have not stood the test of time.


    2 The World Is No Stranger To The Multiverse (Sliders)

    A stupid idea from day one.

    Sliders was trash from the beginning.

    It was fun.

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Sep 23 01:46:55 2022
    Subject: Re: 10 Sci-Fi Shows That Aged Poorly - Regardless of the cult
    following, some sci-fi series have not stood the test of time.

    On 9/22/2022 1:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
    anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    In mainstream media, sci-fi shows tend to take a backseat to classic
    sitcoms and profoundly popular dramas. Despite this, the sci-fi genre
    has a wildly loyal community, defending most borderline-cringe plots.
    Regardless of the cult following, some sci-fi series have not stood the
    test of time.

    While sitcoms get berated for distasteful jokes that don't align with
    the values of today's political climate, sci-fi shows are more so at
    risk of not looking as cool as before. When battling aliens, "looking
    cool" is an essential factor that adds to its authenticity. So, when
    viewers rewatch classics from decades ago, the low production value
    often becomes a topic of harsh criticism in the niche community.

    10 Four Seasons Of Heroes Is Generous (Heroes)

    During its prime, Heroes did surprisingly well. A disparate group of
    randoms worldwide obtain superpowers for the very first time. Albeit
    sounding corny now, 2006 was raving about the premise. However, with
    Marvel producing all things superhero every other week, the rest of the
    entertainment industry pursuing anything remotely similar never stands
    a chance.

    Sporadically throwing in plot twists and ending seemingly every episode
    on cliffhangers wasn't enough for Heroes to keep afloat. By today's
    standard of superhero shows, anything without decades of comic book
    history supporting them is deemed unworthy of success.

    HEROES didn't age badly; it wasn't any good right from the Pilot episode
    which is where I stopped watching.

    I disagree. I think the first season was great, but then they immediately brought back Skyler in season two...

    And the story changed radically with each season. Basically a different
    show each season using the same characters.

    9 Lost Should Get Lost (Lost)

    Lost is the poster child for lack of proper planning. When
    storyboarding any story, it's crucial to consider how the worldbuilding
    will progress as naturally as possible. However, with how eccentric the
    premise of Lost already was, finding a naturally developing story
    progression is a feat.

    Towards the end of Lost, it becomes increasingly clear that the
    creators never had a plan. Throwing in random anecdotes like polar
    bears on a stranded, tropical island is as fascinating as Lost gets. As
    compelling as the original synopsis was, the series ran its course. No
    one wishes for a Lost revival any time soon.

    LOST fell apart halfway through the series, which the article mentions. So >> I'm not sure how that classifies as “aged badly“

    8 Star Trek Is A Classic Despite The Run-Down Production (Star Trek:
    The Next Generation)

    Star Trek is undoubtedly sci-fi royalty. Cult following aside, Star
    Trek: The Next Generation stands by some timeless values that align
    with today's inclusive political ideals. It makes several attempts at
    diversity and gender equality. Disregarding how these pertinent issues
    are addressed and reflected in the dialogue, for the '60s, the show
    made a solid attempt at standing on compassionate and harmonious
    grounds.

    Star Trek: The Next Generation mostly ages in terms of its actual
    production. From hairstyles to amateur lighting, the series' overall
    aesthetic is incredibly outdated. Combined with stiff acting and slow
    pacing, Star Trek: The Next Generation may be part of a classic, but by
    no means has it aged well as a series.

    STAR TREK TNG was rotten right from the pilot all the way to data versus
    the space Mayans and including its movies. The person writing this article >> is an idiot. My viewing accomplice said after encounter at Farpoint that
    if this mess was called Battlestar Galactica the next generation we
    wouldn't have tuned in for episode two.

    7 Inhumans.
    Many shows and movies have proven that the Marvel name doesn't
    guarantee anything but epic CGI. This is why it speaks to how horrid
    Inhumans is — they don't even have that going for them.

    Inhumans started aging horribly before it was even released. Originally
    marketed as a movie, the first two episodes of the eight-episode series
    were screened on IMAX and received monumental negative reviews from
    critics and audiences. Being one of Jack Kirby's most significant
    works, Inhumans had a lot going for it. Yet, its delivery disappointed
    even the most hardcore Marvel fans. Conning it an X-Men knockoff,
    Inhumans had mediocre production value and cringe dialogue, downgrading
    an otherwise cool concept in the Marvel Universe.

    INHUMANS
    OMG! Inhumans collapsed during the first episode! How can something that
    was terrible to start with age poorly? And I love the Inhumans in the
    comics. But the first thing they did was decide they couldn't afford the
    effects and so they moved everybody off screen. Shaved medusa's head. Lost >> the lockjaw.

    Danny from Superhero Movies Every day

    https://superheroeseveryday.com/2022/08/29/inhumans-70b-1/#more-11518

    is currently covering this with the host of the Signal Watch Podcast. Apparently, he's the only person who watched the entire series.

    I think I watched all of it but all I really remember is summed up by
    Anim's hair-chewing weasels comment.

    6 Conspiracy Theorists Are Now Internet Trolls (X-Files)

    Once upon a time, conspiracy theorists took center stage in the media
    instead of hiding under endless Reddit threads in the deepest, darkest
    corners of the internet. By reputation of mythology alone, X-Files has
    aged poorly.

    When a series runs for 11 seasons, transcending decades into a new
    millennium, aging poorly is entirely understandable. From 1993 to 2018,
    X-Files fans have watched countless weekly monsters flop. Alternating
    between the good and the bad, X-Files has had polarizing reviews.
    Overall it has aged poorly, especially with the innumerable X-Files
    variants the world has seen since its release.

    X FILES ran out of steam halfway through. I've never even seen a lot
    of the later episodes.

    I got tired of them continuously switching between "it's really a an
    alien conspiracy" and "It's really a gubberment coverup".

    It was an alien run government coverup of the alien conspiracy with the government.


    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Magewolf@3:633/280.2 to All on Thu Sep 29 05:50:44 2022
    Subject: Re: 10 Sci-Fi Shows That Aged Poorly - Regardless of the cult
    following, some sci-fi series have not stood the test of time.

    On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 08:46:55 -0700, Dimensional Traveler wrote:

    On 9/22/2022 1:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
    anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    In mainstream media, sci-fi shows tend to take a backseat to classic
    sitcoms and profoundly popular dramas. Despite this, the sci-fi genre
    has a wildly loyal community, defending most borderline-cringe plots.
    Regardless of the cult following, some sci-fi series have not stood
    the test of time.

    While sitcoms get berated for distasteful jokes that don't align with
    the values of today's political climate, sci-fi shows are more so at
    risk of not looking as cool as before. When battling aliens, "looking
    cool" is an essential factor that adds to its authenticity. So, when
    viewers rewatch classics from decades ago, the low production value
    often becomes a topic of harsh criticism in the niche community.

    10 Four Seasons Of Heroes Is Generous (Heroes)

    During its prime, Heroes did surprisingly well. A disparate group of
    randoms worldwide obtain superpowers for the very first time. Albeit
    sounding corny now, 2006 was raving about the premise. However, with
    Marvel producing all things superhero every other week, the rest of
    the entertainment industry pursuing anything remotely similar never
    stands a chance.

    Sporadically throwing in plot twists and ending seemingly every
    episode on cliffhangers wasn't enough for Heroes to keep afloat. By
    today's standard of superhero shows, anything without decades of
    comic book history supporting them is deemed unworthy of success.

    HEROES didn't age badly; it wasn't any good right from the Pilot
    episode which is where I stopped watching.

    I disagree. I think the first season was great, but then they
    immediately brought back Skyler in season two...

    And the story changed radically with each season. Basically a different
    show each season using the same characters.

    9 Lost Should Get Lost (Lost)

    Lost is the poster child for lack of proper planning. When
    storyboarding any story, it's crucial to consider how the
    worldbuilding will progress as naturally as possible. However, with
    how eccentric the premise of Lost already was, finding a naturally
    developing story progression is a feat.

    Towards the end of Lost, it becomes increasingly clear that the
    creators never had a plan. Throwing in random anecdotes like polar
    bears on a stranded, tropical island is as fascinating as Lost gets.
    As compelling as the original synopsis was, the series ran its
    course. No one wishes for a Lost revival any time soon.

    LOST fell apart halfway through the series, which the article
    mentions. So I'm not sure how that classifies as “aged badly“

    8 Star Trek Is A Classic Despite The Run-Down Production (Star Trek:
    The Next Generation)

    Star Trek is undoubtedly sci-fi royalty. Cult following aside, Star
    Trek: The Next Generation stands by some timeless values that align
    with today's inclusive political ideals. It makes several attempts at
    diversity and gender equality. Disregarding how these pertinent
    issues are addressed and reflected in the dialogue, for the '60s, the
    show made a solid attempt at standing on compassionate and harmonious
    grounds.

    Star Trek: The Next Generation mostly ages in terms of its actual
    production. From hairstyles to amateur lighting, the series' overall
    aesthetic is incredibly outdated. Combined with stiff acting and slow
    pacing, Star Trek: The Next Generation may be part of a classic, but
    by no means has it aged well as a series.

    STAR TREK TNG was rotten right from the pilot all the way to data
    versus the space Mayans and including its movies. The person writing
    this article is an idiot. My viewing accomplice said after encounter
    at Farpoint that if this mess was called Battlestar Galactica the next
    generation we wouldn't have tuned in for episode two.

    7 Inhumans.
    Many shows and movies have proven that the Marvel name doesn't
    guarantee anything but epic CGI. This is why it speaks to how horrid
    Inhumans is — they don't even have that going for them.

    Inhumans started aging horribly before it was even released.
    Originally marketed as a movie, the first two episodes of the
    eight-episode series were screened on IMAX and received monumental
    negative reviews from critics and audiences. Being one of Jack
    Kirby's most significant works, Inhumans had a lot going for it. Yet,
    its delivery disappointed even the most hardcore Marvel fans. Conning
    it an X-Men knockoff, Inhumans had mediocre production value and
    cringe dialogue, downgrading an otherwise cool concept in the Marvel
    Universe.

    INHUMANS OMG! Inhumans collapsed during the first episode! How can
    something that was terrible to start with age poorly? And I love the
    Inhumans in the comics. But the first thing they did was decide they
    couldn't afford the effects and so they moved everybody off screen.
    Shaved medusa's head. Lost the lockjaw.

    Danny from Superhero Movies Every day

    https://superheroeseveryday.com/2022/08/29/inhumans-70b-1/#more-11518

    is currently covering this with the host of the Signal Watch Podcast.
    Apparently, he's the only person who watched the entire series.

    I think I watched all of it but all I really remember is summed up by
    Anim's hair-chewing weasels comment.

    6 Conspiracy Theorists Are Now Internet Trolls (X-Files)

    Once upon a time, conspiracy theorists took center stage in the media
    instead of hiding under endless Reddit threads in the deepest,
    darkest corners of the internet. By reputation of mythology alone,
    X-Files has aged poorly.

    When a series runs for 11 seasons, transcending decades into a new
    millennium, aging poorly is entirely understandable. From 1993 to
    2018,
    X-Files fans have watched countless weekly monsters flop. Alternating
    between the good and the bad, X-Files has had polarizing reviews.
    Overall it has aged poorly, especially with the innumerable X-Files
    variants the world has seen since its release.

    X FILES ran out of steam halfway through. I've never even seen a lot
    of the later episodes.

    I got tired of them continuously switching between "it's really a an
    alien conspiracy" and "It's really a gubberment coverup".

    It was an alien run government coverup of the alien conspiracy with the government.

    I think that was actually in the show.

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Ubiquitous@3:633/280.2 to All on Fri Sep 30 18:30:42 2022
    Subject: Re: 10 Sci-Fi Shows That Aged Poorly - Regardless of the cult
    following, some sci-fi series have not stood the test of time.

    In article <th28ik$e814$1@dont-email.me>, Magewolf@nc.rr.com wrote:
    On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 08:46:55 -0700, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 9/22/2022 1:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
    anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    6 Conspiracy Theorists Are Now Internet Trolls (X-Files)

    Once upon a time, conspiracy theorists took center stage in the media >>>>> instead of hiding under endless Reddit threads in the deepest,
    darkest corners of the internet. By reputation of mythology alone,
    X-Files has aged poorly.

    When a series runs for 11 seasons, transcending decades into a new
    millennium, aging poorly is entirely understandable. From 1993 to 2018, >>>>> X-Files fans have watched countless weekly monsters flop. Alternating >>>>> between the good and the bad, X-Files has had polarizing reviews.
    Overall it has aged poorly, especially with the innumerable X-Files
    variants the world has seen since its release.

    X FILES ran out of steam halfway through. I've never even seen a lot
    of the later episodes.

    I got tired of them continuously switching between "it's really a an
    alien conspiracy" and "It's really a gubberment coverup".

    It was an alien run government coverup of the alien conspiracy with the
    government.

    I think that was actually in the show.

    It _was_ the show!

    --
    Let's go Brandon!


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)