• Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?xkcd:_=93Moon_Landing?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_Mission_Pro

    From Paul S Person@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Mar 24 03:04:03 2024
    Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?xkcd:_=93Moon_Landing?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_Mission_Profiles=94?=

    On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 17:14:32 -0400, Cryptoengineer
    <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 3/21/2024 11:46 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:03:02 -0500, Lynn McGuire
    <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
    =20
    xkcd: =93Moon Landing Mission Profiles=94
    https://xkcd.com/2909/

    Explained at:

    = https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/2909:_Moon_Landing_Mission_Pro= files

    Moving the Moon closer would make a great space station and vacation = spot.

    Until it broke up and then rained on the Earth for hundreds of years.
    =20
    And the stepladder suggestion seems to presuppose that the Moon is
    both very close to the Earth and yet stationary relative to the Earth,
    which might be harder to achieve then just contracting the orbit.

    The Earth-Moon Roche limit is 9600 km, center to center, or about 2000
    km surface to surface.

    Any closer, and the moon would break up.

    At that height, the moon would orbit in about five and a half hours.

    Effects on the tides would be noticeable, about 1600x larger than now.

    So, the stepladder suggestion (in the popup in the online comic) is
    definitely out, then.
    --=20
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Scott Dorsey@3:633/280.2 to All on Sun Mar 24 03:37:43 2024
    Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?xkcd:_=93Moon_Landing?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_Mission_Profiles=94?=

    Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

    So, the stepladder suggestion (in the popup in the online comic) is >definitely out, then.

    Duck! Here comes the moon again!
    --scott
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000) (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From John Savard@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Mar 26 00:09:33 2024
    On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 17:14:32 -0400, Cryptoengineer
    <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 3/21/2024 11:46 AM, Paul S Person wrote:

    And the stepladder suggestion seems to presuppose that the Moon is
    both very close to the Earth and yet stationary relative to the Earth,
    which might be harder to achieve then just contracting the orbit.

    The Earth-Moon Roche limit is 9600 km, center to center, or about 2000
    km surface to surface.

    Well, then, geostationary orbit should do just fine.

    So the only problem would be what material to make the stepladder out
    of.

    Well, that and not getting tired on the climb up.

    John Savard

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Lynn McGuire@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Mar 26 06:42:19 2024
    On 3/25/2024 8:09 AM, John Savard wrote:
    On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 17:14:32 -0400, Cryptoengineer
    <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 3/21/2024 11:46 AM, Paul S Person wrote:

    And the stepladder suggestion seems to presuppose that the Moon is
    both very close to the Earth and yet stationary relative to the Earth,
    which might be harder to achieve then just contracting the orbit.

    The Earth-Moon Roche limit is 9600 km, center to center, or about 2000
    km surface to surface.

    Well, then, geostationary orbit should do just fine.

    So the only problem would be what material to make the stepladder out
    of.

    Well, that and not getting tired on the climb up.

    John Savard

    So, who gets the Moon permanently stationed above them ?

    I can see people for it and against it both.

    Lynn


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Joy Beeson@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Mar 26 13:09:52 2024



    On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:42:19 -0500, Lynn McGuire
    <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:

    So, who gets the Moon permanently stationed above them ?

    I can see people for it and against it both.

    The Land of Aweful Shadow might do interesting things to the weather.


    --
    Joy Beeson
    joy beeson at centurylink dot net



    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Alistair Tyrrell@3:633/280.2 to All on Wed Mar 27 10:10:49 2024
    In article <0glovitdrp0ch6e3fm62095n0e256l13ps@4ax.com>, psperson@old.netcom.invalid says...

    On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:03:02 -0500, Lynn McGuire
    <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:

    xkcd: ?Moon Landing Mission Profiles?
    https://xkcd.com/2909/

    Explained at:

    https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/2909:_Moon_Landing_Mission_Profiles

    Moving the Moon closer would make a great space station and vacation spot.

    Until it broke up and then rained on the Earth for hundreds of years.

    And the stepladder suggestion seems to presuppose that the Moon is
    both very close to the Earth and yet stationary relative to the Earth,
    which might be harder to achieve then just contracting the orbit.

    Or do it from a small boat like they used to have in the
    old days - "The Distance of the Moon" by Italo Calvino,
    found in the collection Cosmicomics (highly recommended).


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)