Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=93Climate_Change_ove?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?r_the_past_4000_Yea?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?rs___=94_(was:_=E2=80=9CCli?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?mate_Change_over_th?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?e_past_4000_Years__?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_=E2=80=3F)?=
On 6 Dec 2024 15:53:34 GMT, Jaimie Vandenbergh
<
jaimie@usually.sessile.org> wrote:
On 6 Dec 2024 at 00:14:55 GMT, "William Hyde" <wthyde1953@gmail.com>
wrote:
D wrote:
=20
=20
On Thu, 5 Dec 2024, William Hyde wrote:
=20
D wrote:
=20
=20
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, Scott Lurndal wrote:
=20
Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
On 12/3/2024 7:59 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
On 12/3/24 17:01, Lynn McGuire wrote:
???Climate Change over the past 4000 Years???
=20
I have quite a bit of experience running forced flow and natural =
flow
reactors. Sol acts exactly like a natural flow reactor with both >>>>>>> short
and long cycles of variability.
=20
You have zero climate science background, so your experience with
non-nuclear reactors seems somewhat irrelevent.
=20
Nonsense. Climate "science" is political. The real stuff is climate
science reduced to physics.
=20
Let's try a little test, shall we?
=20
What do you think is used to create climate models?
=20
No cheating, no looking it up. I want to know what you thought at =
the
time you wrote the above.
=20
William Hyde
=20
That models can be whipped up at will, based on the directions of the
people who are funding it. Climate gate is an excellent example of =
the
corruption in the field. It was probably just the tip of the iceberg.
=20
That is not an answer to the question I asked.
=20
Try again.
You'll find it an easier life if you stop trying to engage in logical >arguments with people who don't believe in facts, science, evidence or
logic.
But ... but ... but ... it's so much /fun/ tweaking them!
--=20
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"
--- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)