• =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=9CLatest_Arctic_Ice_Measurements_Are_In!_=E2=80=94?=

    From Lynn McGuire@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Jul 22 08:00:42 2025
    Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=9CLatest_Arctic_Ice_Measurements_Are_In!_=E2=80=94?=
    =?UTF-8?Q?_Someone_Get_Al_Gore_A_Tissue=E2=80=9D?=

    “Latest Arctic Ice Measurements Are In! — Someone Get Al Gore A Tissue”

    https://clashdaily.com/2025/07/latest-arctic-ice-measurements-are-in-someone-get-al-gore-a-tissue/

    “Before that, Al Gore had confidently predicted that the sea ice would
    be gone in just a few years, both in his ‘documentary’ (the one that
    lost some court battles concerning its claims) and his ‘Day After Tomorrow’ cataclysm movie where the polar ice slid into the ocean,
    causing New York to freeze over.”

    “Our allegedly ‘fragile’ planet needs to be saved from us, we are routinely told, as the environment is invoked again and again as the
    blunt instrument we are hit over the head with as a justification for increasingly draconian expectations curtailing the freedom of ordinary people.”

    “But since they have been pretty consistent in their own alarmism about
    the loss of sea ice, it should be an important data point that current
    levels of sea ice exceed levels recorded in the very first year of
    tracking them — 1981.”

    “Better still, there are only two years in the last 20 in which recorded levels of sea ice coverage were more than this year’s levels.”

    “So, how will we POSSIBLY break the sad news to Al Gore?”

    Lynn


    --- MBSE BBS v1.1.1 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Graham@3:633/280.2 to All on Tue Jul 22 19:10:28 2025
    Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_=E2=80=9CLatest_Arctic_Ice_Measurements_Are_In!_?=
    =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=94_Someone_Get_Al_Gore_A_Tissue=E2=80=9D?=

    On 21/07/2025 23:00, Lynn McGuire wrote:

    “But since they have been pretty consistent in their own alarmism about the loss of sea ice, it should be an important data point that current levels of sea ice exceed levels recorded in the very first year of
    tracking them — 1981.”

    Whoever runs that site is guilty of some pretty obvious cherrypicking
    of their figures.

    The graphs are available for five areas - Eastern Arctic, East Coast,
    Hudson Bay, Western Arctic and Great Lakes. In four of those five, ice coverage is well below 1981 levels. Failing to point this out is heavily disingenuous at best.

    From https://iceweb1.cis.ec.gc.ca/Prod/page1.xhtml

    pick "Ice Cover Graph", "Ice Cover Graph - Historical Total Accumulated
    Ice Coverage" and "All"

    If anyone's interested in what the Met Office has to say, complete with
    graphs covering the same period, you can look here:


    https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/approach/monitoring/sea-ice/2025/briefing-on-arctic-and-antarctic-sea-ice---july-2025

    -- 12345678902234567890323456789042345678905234567890623456789072345678908234567890

    --- MBSE BBS v1.1.1 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Scott Lurndal@3:633/280.2 to All on Wed Jul 23 00:51:29 2025
    Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_=E2=80=9CLatest_Arctic_Ice_Measurements_Are_In!_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=94_Someone_Get_Al_Gore_A_Tissue=E2=80=9D?=
    Reply-To: slp53@pacbell.net

    Graham <zotzlists@gmail.com> writes:
    On 21/07/2025 23:00, Lynn McGuire wrote:

    “But since they have been pretty consistent in their own alarmism about >> the loss of sea ice, it should be an important data point that current
    levels of sea ice exceed levels recorded in the very first year of
    tracking them — 1981.”

    Whoever runs that site is guilty of some pretty obvious cherrypicking
    of their figures.

    The graphs are available for five areas - Eastern Arctic, East Coast,
    Hudson Bay, Western Arctic and Great Lakes. In four of those five, ice >coverage is well below 1981 levels. Failing to point this out is heavily >disingenuous at best.

    It's Lynn, ideology trumps facts in his world.

    https://earth.gsfc.nasa.gov/cryo/data/current-state-sea-ice-cover


    From https://iceweb1.cis.ec.gc.ca/Prod/page1.xhtml

    pick "Ice Cover Graph", "Ice Cover Graph - Historical Total Accumulated
    Ice Coverage" and "All"

    If anyone's interested in what the Met Office has to say, complete with >graphs covering the same period, you can look here:


    https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/approach/monitoring/sea-ice/2025/briefing-on-arctic-and-antarctic-sea-ice---july-2025

    --- MBSE BBS v1.1.1 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: UsenetServer - www.usenetserver.com (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From Paul S Person@3:633/280.2 to All on Wed Jul 23 02:07:31 2025
    Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=93Latest_Arctic_Ice_?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Measurements_Are_In?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?!_=97_Someone_Get_Al_?=
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gore_A_Tissue=94?=

    On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 17:00:42 -0500, Lynn McGuire
    <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:

    =93Latest Arctic Ice Measurements Are In! =97 Someone Get Al Gore A = Tissue=94
    =20
    https://clashdaily.com/2025/07/latest-arctic-ice-measurements-are-in-som= eone-get-al-gore-a-tissue/

    =93Before that, Al Gore had confidently predicted that the sea ice would=
    =20
    be gone in just a few years, both in his =91documentary=92 (the one that=
    =20
    lost some court battles concerning its claims) and his =91Day After=20 >Tomorrow=92 cataclysm movie where the polar ice slid into the ocean,=20 >causing New York to freeze over.=94

    <snippo nonsense others have addressed>

    /The Day After Tomorrow/ came out two years before /An Inconvient
    Truth/. Gore appears to have had nothing to do with the former.

    And /The Day After Tomorrow/ contains no "polar ice slid[ing] into the
    ocean". New York -- indeed the Northern half of the USA -- does indeed
    freeze over, however.

    So here's the question: here we have a site that cannot even get its
    movies right. Why should we trust them to get anything else right?
    ("right" here meaning "correct", BTW)
    --=20
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- MBSE BBS v1.1.1 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From William Hyde@3:633/280.2 to All on Wed Jul 23 09:23:26 2025
    Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_=e2=80=9cLatest_Arctic_Ice_Measurements_Are_In!_?=
    =?UTF-8?Q?=e2=80=94_Someone_Get_Al_Gore_A_Tissue=e2=80=9d?=

    Lynn McGuire wrote:
    “Latest Arctic Ice Measurements Are In! — Someone Get Al Gore A Tissue”

    https://clashdaily.com/2025/07/latest-arctic-ice-measurements-are-in-someone-get-al-gore-a-tissue/


    “Before that, Al Gore had confidently predicted that the sea ice would
    be gone in just a few years, both in his ‘documentary’ (the one that lost some court battles concerning its claims) and his ‘Day After Tomorrow’ cataclysm movie where the polar ice slid into the ocean,
    causing New York to freeze over.”

    Ah, Lynn. You and reality are at best distant acquaintances.

    Actually, as this is an SF group, and alternate realities are a common
    subject of SF, let us consider an alternate universe where Lynn and
    Trump are right about everything.

    Let's see. Could we write books based on the following?

    (1) Donald Trump is a self-made man

    (2) By selling the US oil at below world prices for fifty years, Canada
    is ripping off the US.

    (3) Biden appointed Jerome Powell

    (3a) Biden was president in 2017

    (4) The US will fall apart in five years.

    (5) Fentanyl is flooding into the US from Canada (maybe we pack it in
    the pipelines?).

    (5) The world is not growing warmer

    (5a) North America's fires are due to lazy people who don't rake
    forests, unlike the industrious folk of the 1990s.

    (6) USMCA is the greatest trade deal of all time. All credit to Pres Trump.

    (7) USMCA is the worst trade deal of all time. All blame to someone else.

    We could go on. But what should be the pen name? I'd go with "Angery American", but that is taken.

    William Hyde



    --- MBSE BBS v1.1.1 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (3:633/280.2@fidonet)
  • From scott@3:633/10 to All on Thu Sep 4 14:48:41 2025
    Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@gmail.com> writes:
    On 22/07/2025 17:07, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 17:00:42 -0500, Lynn McGuire
    <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:

    rCLLatest Arctic Ice Measurements Are In! rCo Someone Get Al Gore A TissuerCY

    https://clashdaily.com/2025/07/latest-arctic-ice-measurements-are-in-someone-get-al-gore-a-tissue/

    rCLBefore that, Al Gore had confidently predicted that the sea ice would >>> be gone in just a few years, both in his rCydocumentaryrCO (the one that >>> lost some court battles concerning its claims) and his rCyDay After
    TomorrowrCO cataclysm movie where the polar ice slid into the ocean,
    causing New York to freeze over.rCY

    <snippo nonsense others have addressed>

    /The Day After Tomorrow/ came out two years before /An Inconvient
    Truth/. Gore appears to have had nothing to do with the former.

    And /The Day After Tomorrow/ contains no "polar ice slid[ing] into the
    ocean". New York -- indeed the Northern half of the USA -- does indeed
    freeze over, however.

    So here's the question: here we have a site that cannot even get its
    movies right. Why should we trust them to get anything else right?
    ("right" here meaning "correct", BTW)


    North polar ice was, and, what remains, is in
    the ocean already. If the ice on Greenland and
    on Antarctica (and at the south pole) slips into
    thevsea more than it already has, then New York City
    may get quite wet. Which can happen already on a
    windy day. Ice is less likely.

    I don't see a reason to argue that the rest of what
    Lynn quoted is anything other than nonsensical lies.

    Lynn makes his living from fossil fuels. It's not in his
    best interest to care about the rest of the planet, so long
    has his customers can extract more money from the
    exploitation of a fundamentally limited resource.

    He's about to reach 65, one might think he'd be concerned
    about the world he is leaving to his child, but since
    he owns his business, it's likely he'll continue to
    ignore science and continue parroting nonsense from
    right-wing garbage sites.

    === Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
    --- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux
    * Origin: ---:- FTN<->UseNet Gate -:--- (3:633/10)
  • From scott@3:633/10 to All on Thu Sep 4 21:05:20 2025
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    On 9/4/2025 9:48 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@gmail.com> writes:
    On 22/07/2025 17:07, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 17:00:42 -0500, Lynn McGuire
    <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:

    rCLLatest Arctic Ice Measurements Are In! rCo Someone Get Al Gore A TissuerCY

    https://clashdaily.com/2025/07/latest-arctic-ice-measurements-are-in-someone-get-al-gore-a-tissue/

    rCLBefore that, Al Gore had confidently predicted that the sea ice would >>>>> be gone in just a few years, both in his rCydocumentaryrCO (the one that >>>>> lost some court battles concerning its claims) and his rCyDay After
    TomorrowrCO cataclysm movie where the polar ice slid into the ocean, >>>>> causing New York to freeze over.rCY

    <snippo nonsense others have addressed>

    /The Day After Tomorrow/ came out two years before /An Inconvient
    Truth/. Gore appears to have had nothing to do with the former.

    And /The Day After Tomorrow/ contains no "polar ice slid[ing] into the >>>> ocean". New York -- indeed the Northern half of the USA -- does indeed >>>> freeze over, however.

    So here's the question: here we have a site that cannot even get its
    movies right. Why should we trust them to get anything else right?
    ("right" here meaning "correct", BTW)


    North polar ice was, and, what remains, is in
    the ocean already. If the ice on Greenland and
    on Antarctica (and at the south pole) slips into
    thevsea more than it already has, then New York City
    may get quite wet. Which can happen already on a
    windy day. Ice is less likely.

    I don't see a reason to argue that the rest of what
    Lynn quoted is anything other than nonsensical lies.

    Lynn makes his living from fossil fuels. It's not in his
    best interest to care about the rest of the planet, so long
    has his customers can extract more money from the
    exploitation of a fundamentally limited resource.

    He's about to reach 65, one might think he'd be concerned
    about the world he is leaving to his child, but since
    he owns his business, it's likely he'll continue to
    ignore science and continue parroting nonsense from
    right-wing garbage sites.

    I've been 65 for quite a while now. And I have more than one child.

    And you keep on listening to the crazies like Mann

    See, you can't refute the facts and resort to Ad Homenim. You
    don't get to define "crazy".

    and the rest of them

    Like the IPCC? Like our own Dr. Hyde?

    While I know who Mann is, he's one of thousands of
    scientists who actually understand the atmospheric
    behavior of carbon dioxide vis-a-vis emitted IR.

    Spencer and Christy, however, are only two.

    "Perhaps the darlings of the denialist community are
    two researchers out of Alabama (John Christy and Roy
    Spencer). They rose to public attention in the mid-1990s
    when they reportedly showed that the atmosphere was not
    warming and was actually cooling. It turns out they had
    made some pretty significant errors and when other researchers
    identified those errors, the new results showed a warming."




    while me and mine are keeping the lights on.

    My lights are powered by the sun.

    === Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
    --- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux
    * Origin: ---:- FTN<->UseNet Gate -:--- (3:633/10)