On 2025-11-12 03:50:06 +0000, The Horny Goat said:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 15:52:56 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
I was seated for a case a couple of weeks ago involving a former Little
Caesar's employee who was accused of ripping the store off of $1,700,
we found her not guilty. Lots of in-store and bank video snippets but
not enough evidence for guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
She stood at the courthouse door and thanked the jury as they left the
building, never heard of anyone doing that before.
Are you talking about the accused or the judge? I've seen the latter,
never the former.
It was the defendant, I couldn't imagine a judge walking downstairs to
thank jurors as they exited even in my town.
moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 11/11/2025 4:52 PM, super70s wrote:
On 2025-11-10 19:40:52 +0000, BTR1701 said:
On Nov 10, 2025 at 7:21:06 AM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> >>>> wrote:
I've got jury duty again, this time in federal court. Trump has security >>>>> fencing around the courthouse but there were no protestors.
The pool is for both civil and criminal. When I was summoned for state >>>>> court, it was just criminal.
Tomorrow is a federal holiday. I think I'm on call for the rest of the >>>>> week.
Now that I'm retired, I wish they'd call me for jury duty. When you
have all
the time in the world, that's when they start ignoring you.
I happen to be in the pool for a local circuit court jury from Oct.-Dec. >>>
I was seated for a case a couple of weeks ago involving a former Little
Caesar's employee who was accused of ripping the store off of $1,700, we >>> found her not guilty. Lots of in-store and bank video snippets but not
enough evidence for guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
She stood at the courthouse door and thanked the jury as they left the
building, never heard of anyone doing that before.
$1700 ? I wonder whose cost-effective pursuit that was.
Probably their profit for a month
On 2025-11-12 12:02 a.m., super70s wrote:
On 2025-11-12 03:50:06 +0000, The Horny Goat said:On TV dramas, the judge always thanks the jurors right in the courtroom after they've rendered the verdict. Are you saying that doesn't happen
On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 15:52:56 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
I was seated for a case a couple of weeks ago involving a former Little >>>> Caesar's employee who was accused of ripping the store off of $1,700,
we found her not guilty. Lots of in-store and bank video snippets but
not enough evidence for guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
She stood at the courthouse door and thanked the jury as they left the >>>> building, never heard of anyone doing that before.
Are you talking about the accused or the judge? I've seen the latter,
never the former.
It was the defendant, I couldn't imagine a judge walking downstairs to
thank jurors as they exited even in my town.
in real life?
. . .
They said they don't usually empanel juries later in the week but told
us to call at the end of the day on Wednesday to see if we are on call
for Thursday.
Are you talking about the accused or the judge? I've seen the latter,
never the former.
It was the defendant, I couldn't imagine a judge walking downstairs to
thank jurors as they exited even in my town.
The three times since then that I've gotten the jury service summons,
I've sent in a request to be excused, which were all granted, so I
didn't have to bother going at all.
| Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
|---|---|
| Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
| Users: | 14 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 114:31:24 |
| Calls: | 184 |
| Files: | 21,502 |
| Messages: | 81,761 |