If you see a map of the Department Of Agriculture's Supplemental
Nutrition program, you can see the trendy urban areas favored
by wealthy leftists receive no SNAP benefits. The SNAP benefits
are directed to areas that the progressive corporate world
contemptuously call "fly over country":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_federal_government_shutdown#/media/File:SNAP_recipients_by_County.png
If you see a map of the Department Of Agriculture's Supplemental
Nutrition program, you can see the trendy urban areas favored
by wealthy leftists receive no SNAP benefits. The SNAP benefits
are directed to areas that the progressive corporate world
contemptuously call "fly over country":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_federal_government_shutdown#/media/File:SNAP_recipients_by_County.png
On Nov 12, 2025 at 10:17:03 PM PST, "Pluted Pup" <plutedpup@outlook.com> >wrote:
If you see a map of the Department Of Agriculture's Supplemental
Nutrition program, you can see the trendy urban areas favored
by wealthy leftists receive no SNAP benefits. The SNAP benefits
are directed to areas that the progressive corporate world
contemptuously call "fly over country":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_federal_government_shutdown#/media/File:SNAP_recipients_by_County.png
The U.S. Department of Agriculture administers the SNAP program and proudly >boasts that it has more than 47 million regular subscribers that depend on it >for food.
On the other hand, the U.S. Department of Interior administers the national >parks, every one of which admonishes visitors not to feed the animals because >they will become dependent on the handouts and never learn to feed >themselves.
On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 20:38:08 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
On Nov 12, 2025 at 10:17:03 PM PST, "Pluted Pup" <plutedpup@outlook.com>
wrote:
If you see a map of the Department Of Agriculture's Supplemental
Nutrition program, you can see the trendy urban areas favored
by wealthy leftists receive no SNAP benefits. The SNAP benefits
are directed to areas that the progressive corporate world
contemptuously call "fly over country":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_federal_government_shutdown#/media/File:SNAP_recipients_by_County.png
The U.S. Department of Agriculture administers the SNAP program and proudly >> boasts that it has more than 47 million regular subscribers that depend on it
for food.
On the other hand, the U.S. Department of Interior administers the national >> parks, every one of which admonishes visitors not to feed the animals because
they will become dependent on the handouts and never learn to feed
themselves.
So children and the elderly, the majority of the people benefiting
from SNAP, are supposed to go out and get a job. Glad to see you truly
care.
On Nov 13, 2025 at 12:46:41 PM PST, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 20:38:08 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
On Nov 12, 2025 at 10:17:03 PM PST, "Pluted Pup" <plutedpup@outlook.com> >>> wrote:
If you see a map of the Department Of Agriculture's Supplemental
Nutrition program, you can see the trendy urban areas favored
by wealthy leftists receive no SNAP benefits. The SNAP benefits
are directed to areas that the progressive corporate world
contemptuously call "fly over country":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_federal_government_shutdown#/media/File:SNAP_recipients_by_County.png
The U.S. Department of Agriculture administers the SNAP program and proudly >>> boasts that it has more than 47 million regular subscribers that depend on it
for food.
On the other hand, the U.S. Department of Interior administers the national >>> parks, every one of which admonishes visitors not to feed the animals because
they will become dependent on the handouts and never learn to feed
themselves.
So children and the elderly, the majority of the people benefiting
from SNAP, are supposed to go out and get a job. Glad to see you truly
care.
Sorry, but SNAP is the most abused and defrauded welfare program in the nation's history. Do something about all the fraud and make the people who *can* work for their benefits (but won't because they'd rather sit around and let everyone else pay to feed them) get a job, and then I'll start to care.
Nov 12, 2025 at 10:17:03 PM PST, Pluted Pup <plutedpup@outlook.com> wrote:
If you see a map of the Department Of Agriculture's Supplemental
Nutrition program, you can see the trendy urban areas favored
by wealthy leftists receive no SNAP benefits. The SNAP benefits
are directed to areas that the progressive corporate world
contemptuously call "fly over country":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_federal_government_shutdown#/media/File:SNAP_recipients_by_County.png
The U.S. Department of Agriculture administers the SNAP program and proudly >boasts that it has more than 47 million regular subscribers that depend on it >for food.
On the other hand, the U.S. Department of Interior administers the national >parks, every one of which admonishes visitors not to feed the animals because >they will become dependent on the handouts and never learn to feed >themselves.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
"Pluted Pup" <plutedpup@outlook.com> wrote:
If you see a map of the Department Of Agriculture's Supplemental
Nutrition program, you can see the trendy urban areas favored
by wealthy leftists receive no SNAP benefits. The SNAP benefits
are directed to areas that the progressive corporate world
contemptuously call "fly over country":
The U.S. Department of Agriculture administers the SNAP program and proudly >>boasts that it has more than 47 million regular subscribers that depend on >>it for food.
On the other hand, the U.S. Department of Interior administers the national >>parks, every one of which admonishes visitors not to feed the animals >>because they will become dependent on the handouts and never learn to feed >>themselves.
So children and the elderly, the majority of the people benefiting
from SNAP, are supposed to go out and get a job. Glad to see you truly
care.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Nov 12, 2025 at 10:17:03 PM PST, Pluted Pup <plutedpup@outlook.com> wrote:
If you see a map of the Department Of Agriculture's Supplemental
Nutrition program, you can see the trendy urban areas favored
by wealthy leftists receive no SNAP benefits. The SNAP benefits
are directed to areas that the progressive corporate world
contemptuously call "fly over country":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_federal_government_shutdown#/media/File:SNAP_recipients_by_County.png
The U.S. Department of Agriculture administers the SNAP program and proudly >> boasts that it has more than 47 million regular subscribers that depend on it
for food.
On the other hand, the U.S. Department of Interior administers the national >> parks, every one of which admonishes visitors not to feed the animals because
they will become dependent on the handouts and never learn to feed
themselves.
The bears might steal pic-a-nic baskets.
On 11/13/2025 4:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Nov 13, 2025 at 12:46:41 PM PST, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 20:38:08 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
On Nov 12, 2025 at 10:17:03 PM PST, "Pluted Pup" <plutedpup@outlook.com> >>>> wrote:
If you see a map of the Department Of Agriculture's Supplemental
Nutrition program, you can see the trendy urban areas favored
by wealthy leftists receive no SNAP benefits. The SNAP benefits
are directed to areas that the progressive corporate world
contemptuously call "fly over country":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_federal_government_shutdown#/media/File:SNAP_recipients_by_County.png
The U.S. Department of Agriculture administers the SNAP program and proudly
boasts that it has more than 47 million regular subscribers that depend >>>> on it
for food.
On the other hand, the U.S. Department of Interior administers the national
parks, every one of which admonishes visitors not to feed the animals >>>> because
they will become dependent on the handouts and never learn to feed
themselves.
So children and the elderly, the majority of the people benefiting
from SNAP, are supposed to go out and get a job. Glad to see you truly
care.
Sorry, but SNAP is the most abused and defrauded welfare program in the
nation's history. Do something about all the fraud and make the people who >> *can* work for their benefits (but won't because they'd rather sit around >> and
let everyone else pay to feed them) get a job, and then I'll start to care.
The presence of fraud in a benefits program (there'll always be some)
seems a reason to address the fraud, not an excuse to axe the program.
On Nov 13, 2025 at 2:37:32 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 11/13/2025 4:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Nov 13, 2025 at 12:46:41 PM PST, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 20:38:08 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
On Nov 12, 2025 at 10:17:03 PM PST, "Pluted Pup" <plutedpup@outlook.com>
wrote:
If you see a map of the Department Of Agriculture's Supplemental >>>>>> Nutrition program, you can see the trendy urban areas favored
by wealthy leftists receive no SNAP benefits. The SNAP benefits >>>>>> are directed to areas that the progressive corporate world
contemptuously call "fly over country":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_federal_government_shutdown#/media/File:SNAP_recipients_by_County.png
The U.S. Department of Agriculture administers the SNAP program and proudly
boasts that it has more than 47 million regular subscribers that depend >>>>> on it
for food.
On the other hand, the U.S. Department of Interior administers the national
parks, every one of which admonishes visitors not to feed the animals >>>>> because
they will become dependent on the handouts and never learn to feed >>>>> themselves.
So children and the elderly, the majority of the people benefiting
from SNAP, are supposed to go out and get a job. Glad to see you truly >>>> care.
Sorry, but SNAP is the most abused and defrauded welfare program in the >>> nation's history. Do something about all the fraud and make the people who
*can* work for their benefits (but won't because they'd rather sit around >>> and
let everyone else pay to feed them) get a job, and then I'll start to care.
The presence of fraud in a benefits program (there'll always be some)
seems a reason to address the fraud, not an excuse to axe the program.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBh2YWp1dyA
(And with added bonus of Angela Rose, who has stolen the title of 'cutest conservative commentator' from Brett Cooper.)
On 11/14/2025 3:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Nov 13, 2025 at 2:37:32 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
On 11/13/2025 4:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Nov 13, 2025 at 12:46:41 PM PST, "shawn"
<nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 20:38:08 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> >>>>> wrote:
On Nov 12, 2025 at 10:17:03 PM PST, "Pluted Pup" <plutedpup@outlook.com>
wrote:
If you see a map of the Department Of Agriculture's Supplemental >>>>>>> Nutrition program, you can see the trendy urban areas favored >>>>>>> by wealthy leftists receive no SNAP benefits. The SNAP benefits >>>>>>> are directed to areas that the progressive corporate world
contemptuously call "fly over country":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_federal_government_shutdown#/media/File:SNAP_recipients_by_County.png
The U.S. Department of Agriculture administers the SNAP program and >>>>>> proudly
boasts that it has more than 47 million regular subscribers that depend
on it for food.
On the other hand, the U.S. Department of Interior administers the >>>>>> national
parks, every one of which admonishes visitors not to feed the animals >>>>>> because
they will become dependent on the handouts and never learn to feed >>>>>> themselves.
So children and the elderly, the majority of the people benefiting >>>>> from SNAP, are supposed to go out and get a job. Glad to see you truly >>>>> care.
Sorry, but SNAP is the most abused and defrauded welfare program in the >>>> nation's history. Do something about all the fraud and make the people who
*can* work for their benefits (but won't because they'd rather sit around
and let everyone else pay to feed them) get a job, and then I'll start to >>>> care.
The presence of fraud in a benefits program (there'll always be some)
seems a reason to address the fraud, not an excuse to axe the program.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBh2YWp1dyA
(And with added bonus of Angela Rose, who has stolen the title of 'cutest >> conservative commentator' from Brett Cooper.)
The proposal seems to be that welfare recipients be denied Coca-Cola...
On Nov 14, 2025 at 2:33:05 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 11/14/2025 3:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Nov 13, 2025 at 2:37:32 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
On 11/13/2025 4:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBh2YWp1dyA
On Nov 13, 2025 at 12:46:41 PM PST, "shawn"
<nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 20:38:08 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On Nov 12, 2025 at 10:17:03 PM PST, "Pluted Pup" <plutedpup@outlook.com>
wrote:
If you see a map of the Department Of Agriculture's Supplemental >>>>>>>> Nutrition program, you can see the trendy urban areas favored >>>>>>>> by wealthy leftists receive no SNAP benefits. The SNAP benefits >>>>>>>> are directed to areas that the progressive corporate world >>>>>>>> contemptuously call "fly over country":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_federal_government_shutdown#/media/File:SNAP_recipients_by_County.png
The U.S. Department of Agriculture administers the SNAP program and >>>>>>> proudly
boasts that it has more than 47 million regular subscribers that depend
on it for food.
On the other hand, the U.S. Department of Interior administers the >>>>>>> national
parks, every one of which admonishes visitors not to feed the animals
because
they will become dependent on the handouts and never learn to feed >>>>>>> themselves.
So children and the elderly, the majority of the people benefiting >>>>>> from SNAP, are supposed to go out and get a job. Glad to see you truly
care.
Sorry, but SNAP is the most abused and defrauded welfare program in the
nation's history. Do something about all the fraud and make the people who
*can* work for their benefits (but won't because they'd rather sit around
and let everyone else pay to feed them) get a job, and then I'll start to
care.
The presence of fraud in a benefits program (there'll always be some) >>>> seems a reason to address the fraud, not an excuse to axe the program. >>>
(And with added bonus of Angela Rose, who has stolen the title of 'cutest >>> conservative commentator' from Brett Cooper.)
The proposal seems to be that welfare recipients be denied Coca-Cola...
Among other things.
On 11/14/2025 5:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Nov 14, 2025 at 2:33:05 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
On 11/14/2025 3:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Nov 13, 2025 at 2:37:32 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 11/13/2025 4:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBh2YWp1dyA
On Nov 13, 2025 at 12:46:41 PM PST, "shawn"
<nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 20:38:08 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
On Nov 12, 2025 at 10:17:03 PM PST, "Pluted Pup" <plutedpup@outlook.com>
wrote:
If you see a map of the Department Of Agriculture's Supplemental
Nutrition program, you can see the trendy urban areas favored >>>>>>>>> by wealthy leftists receive no SNAP benefits. The SNAP benefits
are directed to areas that the progressive corporate world >>>>>>>>> contemptuously call "fly over country":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_federal_government_shutdown#/media/File:SNAP_recipients_by_County.png
The U.S. Department of Agriculture administers the SNAP program and
proudly
boasts that it has more than 47 million regular subscribers that depend
on it for food.
On the other hand, the U.S. Department of Interior administers the
national
parks, every one of which admonishes visitors not to feed the animals
because
they will become dependent on the handouts and never learn to feed
themselves.
So children and the elderly, the majority of the people benefiting >>>>>>> from SNAP, are supposed to go out and get a job. Glad to see you truly
care.
Sorry, but SNAP is the most abused and defrauded welfare program in the
nation's history. Do something about all the fraud and make the >>>>>> people who
*can* work for their benefits (but won't because they'd rather sit >>>>>> around
and let everyone else pay to feed them) get a job, and then I'll start to
care.
The presence of fraud in a benefits program (there'll always be some) >>>>> seems a reason to address the fraud, not an excuse to axe the program. >>>>
(And with added bonus of Angela Rose, who has stolen the title of 'cutest
conservative commentator' from Brett Cooper.)
The proposal seems to be that welfare recipients be denied Coca-Cola...
Among other things.
Let's settle for the one, as we try to call poor diet a luxury...
On Nov 14, 2025 at 3:00:11 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 11/14/2025 5:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Nov 14, 2025 at 2:33:05 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
On 11/14/2025 3:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Among other things.
On Nov 13, 2025 at 2:37:32 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 11/13/2025 4:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Nov 13, 2025 at 12:46:41 PM PST, "shawn"
<nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 20:38:08 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
On Nov 12, 2025 at 10:17:03 PM PST, "Pluted Pup" <plutedpup@outlook.com>
wrote:
If you see a map of the Department Of Agriculture's Supplemental
Nutrition program, you can see the trendy urban areas favored
by wealthy leftists receive no SNAP benefits. The SNAP benefits
are directed to areas that the progressive corporate world >>>>>>>>>> contemptuously call "fly over country":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_federal_government_shutdown#/media/File:SNAP_recipients_by_County.png
The U.S. Department of Agriculture administers the SNAP program and
proudly
boasts that it has more than 47 million regular subscribers that depend
on it for food.
On the other hand, the U.S. Department of Interior administers the
national
parks, every one of which admonishes visitors not to feed the animals
because
they will become dependent on the handouts and never learn to feed
themselves.
So children and the elderly, the majority of the people benefiting
from SNAP, are supposed to go out and get a job. Glad to see you truly
care.
Sorry, but SNAP is the most abused and defrauded welfare program in the
nation's history. Do something about all the fraud and make the >>>>>>> people who
*can* work for their benefits (but won't because they'd rather sit
around
and let everyone else pay to feed them) get a job, and then I'll start to
care.
The presence of fraud in a benefits program (there'll always be some)
seems a reason to address the fraud, not an excuse to axe the program.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBh2YWp1dyA
(And with added bonus of Angela Rose, who has stolen the title of 'cutest
conservative commentator' from Brett Cooper.)
The proposal seems to be that welfare recipients be denied Coca-Cola... >>>
Let's settle for the one, as we try to call poor diet a luxury...
I could just do without the gleeful dancing and entitled laughing over shopping carts loaded with thousands of dollars of food paid for by other people. Maybe a humble thank you? Is that too much to ask?
(And if you can twerk your way down the grocery aisle with glee over your EBT benefits, you're obviously able-bodied enough to get a damn job.)
On 11/14/2025 6:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Nov 14, 2025 at 3:00:11 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 11/14/2025 5:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Nov 14, 2025 at 2:33:05 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 11/14/2025 3:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Among other things.
On Nov 13, 2025 at 2:37:32 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 11/13/2025 4:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Nov 13, 2025 at 12:46:41 PM PST, "shawn"
<nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 20:38:08 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
On Nov 12, 2025 at 10:17:03 PM PST, "Pluted Pup" <plutedpup@outlook.com>
wrote:
If you see a map of the Department Of Agriculture's Supplemental
Nutrition program, you can see the trendy urban areas favored
by wealthy leftists receive no SNAP benefits. The SNAP benefits
are directed to areas that the progressive corporate world >>>>>>>>>>> contemptuously call "fly over country":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_federal_government_shutdown#/media/File:SNAP_recipients_by_County.png
The U.S. Department of Agriculture administers the SNAP program and
proudly
boasts that it has more than 47 million regular subscribers that depend
on it for food.
On the other hand, the U.S. Department of Interior administers the
national
parks, every one of which admonishes visitors not to feed the animals
because
they will become dependent on the handouts and never learn to feed
themselves.
So children and the elderly, the majority of the people benefiting
from SNAP, are supposed to go out and get a job. Glad to see you truly
care.
Sorry, but SNAP is the most abused and defrauded welfare program in the
nation's history. Do something about all the fraud and make the >>>>>>>> people who
*can* work for their benefits (but won't because they'd rather sit
around
and let everyone else pay to feed them) get a job, and then I'll start to
care.
The presence of fraud in a benefits program (there'll always be some)
seems a reason to address the fraud, not an excuse to axe the program.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBh2YWp1dyA
(And with added bonus of Angela Rose, who has stolen the title of 'cutest
conservative commentator' from Brett Cooper.)
The proposal seems to be that welfare recipients be denied Coca-Cola... >>>>
Let's settle for the one, as we try to call poor diet a luxury...
I could just do without the gleeful dancing and entitled laughing over
shopping carts loaded with thousands of dollars of food paid for by other
people. Maybe a humble thank you? Is that too much to ask?
(And if you can twerk your way down the grocery aisle with glee over your EBT
benefits, you're obviously able-bodied enough to get a damn job.)
Those people (welfare queens, etc.) exist, no doubt ...and they make
great clickbait. But neither do I doubt that somebody could compile a >compelling compendium of, say, kids and elderly kept alive by EBT.
. . .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBh2YWp1dyA
(And with added bonus of Angela Rose, who has stolen the title of 'cutest >conservative commentator' from Brett Cooper.)
(And with added bonus of Angela Rose, who has stolen the title of 'cutest >conservative commentator' from Brett Cooper.)
On 11/14/2025 6:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Nov 14, 2025 at 3:00:11 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
On 11/14/2025 5:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Nov 14, 2025 at 2:33:05 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 11/14/2025 3:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Nov 13, 2025 at 2:37:32 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>> wrote:
The presence of fraud in a benefits program (there'll always be some)
seems a reason to address the fraud, not an excuse to axe the program.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBh2YWp1dyA
(And with added bonus of Angela Rose, who has stolen the title of >>>>>> 'cutest
conservative commentator' from Brett Cooper.)
The proposal seems to be that welfare recipients be denied Coca-Cola...
Among other things.
Let's settle for the one, as we try to call poor diet a luxury...
I could just do without the gleeful dancing and entitled laughing over
shopping carts loaded with thousands of dollars of food paid for by other >> people. Maybe a humble thank you? Is that too much to ask?
(And if you can twerk your way down the grocery aisle with glee over your >> EBT
benefits, you're obviously able-bodied enough to get a damn job.)
Those people (welfare queens, etc.) exist, no doubt ...and they make
great clickbait. But neither do I doubt that somebody could compile a compelling compendium of, say, kids and elderly kept alive by EBT.
| Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
|---|---|
| Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
| Users: | 14 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 114:32:27 |
| Calls: | 184 |
| Files: | 21,502 |
| Messages: | 81,761 |
