• Re: How long before we see AI being used to make entire shows?

    From Rhino@3:633/10 to All on Tue Nov 18 13:02:34 2025
    On 2025-09-14 12:49 a.m., The Horny Goat wrote:
    On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 10:54:27 +1200, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
    wrote:

    The New Zealand government are jumping on the badwagon and has just
    announced a load of new subjects that will be offered in high school,
    including AI courses where students can learn how to use them, how they
    work, etc. :-\

    (One of the other new course is some stupidity called "Further
    Mathematics", whatever that means! There are already various
    mathematics courses.)

    As someone whose undergraduate degree is in math one has to wonder
    what that means. I know what my 4th year courses were like and I'm
    pretty sure that sort of thing won't be taught via an AI driven high
    school class.

    I wonder if "Further Mathematics" is that woke nonsense that says 1+1
    doesn't actually equal 2 because that's just a construct of the
    patriarchy. Or maybe it's the "other ways of knowing" that indigenous
    people are supposed to be endowed with?

    --
    Rhino

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Ubiquitous@3:633/10 to All on Thu Nov 20 04:34:20 2025
    thetruemelissa@gmail.com wrote:

    This is a horrible development. Stupid crap like this was a plague even
    when people had to learn something to do it. Now that they can just tell
    an AI to do it, it'll be everywhere. YouTube is already swimming in this >slop.

    Yeah, I recently encountered a series of YouTube vids featuring that famous Japanese-ish physicist talking about 3i/ATLAS that turned out to be an AI creation. I got suspicious because it looked like he was using a cheap web
    cam and I found it hard to believe he had gone "Neil DeGrass Tyson" on us,
    even though it seemed to be from something NASA adjacent.

    I ended up reporting them and they got yanked.

    --
    Not a joke! Don't jump!



    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.1
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Your Name@3:633/10 to All on Fri Nov 21 11:03:15 2025
    On 2025-11-20 06:34:52 +0000, Pluted Pup said:
    On 9/12/25 7:45 AM, The True Melissa wrote:
    Verily, in article <e3t6ck1qgelr1ea1rmuqgf0sgtssfasulb@4ax.com>, did
    nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com deliver unto us this message:
    So some friends of mine have been sending me these music videos being
    made via AI. While they are not perfect they are still not bad.


    This is a horrible development. Stupid crap like this was a plague even
    when people had to learn something to do it. Now that they can just tell
    an AI to do it, it'll be everywhere. YouTube is already swimming in this
    slop.

    I haven't found anywhere the parameters spelled out in any of the "made
    by AI" videos. If they were actually produced by AI anybody else who entered the same parameters would create the same video and would be
    free to change the video.

    AI basically only produces random crap. You could enter the same
    parameters a million times and get a million different results ... and
    all utter garbage.




    I suspect that public relations of the AI companies push these videos
    of unknown origin, perhaps fishing for investor dollars.

    With this, actors have no control over what they appear in. People have
    already made pornos with celebrities swapped in.

    Actors are supposed to have rights to their names and likenesses. If
    enough actors file strikes against this crap, maybe it'll help.

    What's really needed, though, is a technological solution.

    Counter-AI is like counter-surveillance, something completely ignored
    by the tech hypes.



    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.1
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)