• Talarico, Colbert Cry Censorship As CBS Sets The Record Straight

    From Ubiquitous@3:633/10 to All on Sat Feb 21 10:35:44 2026
    The big media controversy of the day comes courtesy of Texas Democratic
    Senate candidate James Talarico and late-night television host Stephen Colbert.

    Talarico insisted that CBS spiked his interview with Stephen Colbert, claiming, ?This is the interview Donald Trump didn?t want you to see.
    His FCC refused to air my interview with Stephen Colbert. Trump is
    worried we?re about to flip Texas.?

    This is the interview Donald Trump didn?t want you to see.

    His FCC refused to air my interview with Stephen Colbert.

    Trump is worried we?re about to flip Texas.
    pic.twitter.com/BCev5jZbKc

    ? James Talarico (@jamestalarico) February 17, 2026

    Talarico is the probable Senate nominee for the Democrats in Texas and
    has been highly touted by a wide variety of people across the political spectrum, including Joe Rogan, on whose show he appeared.

    But the reason CBS spiked the interview is because they?re afraid of
    the so-called Equal Time Rule. The FCC says that in a Senate primary,
    if you provide time to one candidate, you also have to provide equal
    time to the other candidates. CBS then said they didn?t want to provide
    equal time to Talarico?s rivals, including Democrat Rep. Jasmine
    Crockett or some other fringe candidate. Colbert then went on the air
    and ripped into CBS.

    At this point, Colbert is hoping that he is fired so he can be treated
    as a victim ? a victim of the Trump administration and their evil
    acolytes like Larry and David Ellison. Since that is his goal, he is
    actively attempting to militate for his own dismissal.

    That is what he is doing right now. So, after the interview, he went on
    the air and said:

    You might have heard of this thing called the Equal Time rule.
    Okay. It?s an old FCC rule that applies only to radio on
    broadcast television, not cable or streaming, that says if a
    show has a candidate on during an election, they have to have
    all that candidate?s opponents on as well. It?s the FCC?s most
    time honored rule right after no nipples at the Super Bowl.
    There?s long been an exception for this rule, an exception for
    news interviews and talk show interviews with politicians.

    Now that?s crucial. How else were voters supposed to know back
    in 92 that Bill Clinton sucked at saxophone? But on January 21
    of this year, a letter was released by FCC chairman and smug
    bowling pin Brendan Carr. In this letter, Carr said he was
    thinking about dropping the exception for talk shows because
    he said some of them were motivated by partisan purposes. Well,
    sir, you?re chairman of the FCC, so FCC you.

    Brendan Carr is correct. Colbert is obviously motivated by partisan
    purposes. When was the last time he had a major Republican guest? Can
    you name one? When has he invited a major Republican guest on his show
    and treated that person with the same sort of kid gloves with which he
    treats Democrats?

    Every episode of ?The Late Show with Stephen Colbert? is basically an
    ad for one Democrat or another. It is MS NOW with some bad jokes.

    CBS responded:

    THE LATE SHOW was not prohibited by CBS from broadcasting the
    interview with Rep. James Talarico. The show was provided legal
    guidance that the broadcast could trigger the FCC equal-time
    rule for two other candidates, including Rep. Jasmine Crockett,
    and presented options for how the equal time for other
    candidates could be fulfilled. THE LATE SHOW decided to present
    the interview through its YouTube channel with on-air promotion
    on the broadcast rather than potentially providing the equal-
    time options.

    First, Colbert and his team tried to retell the lie that the FCC had
    overtly banned CBS from airing the interview with Talarico. That was
    not true.

    Then, he tried to retell the lie that CBS banned the interview because
    they were afraid of Talarico. And if Colbert hosted Talarico, then
    presumably he would also have to host a Republican candidate in the
    Texas Senate race, like Sen. John Cornyn or Attorney General Ken
    Paxton.

    That is not what the equal time rule says. In the middle of the primary season, Colbert would have had to host another Democrat, Representative Jasmine Crockett. And the producers of ?The Late Show? decided not to
    promote the interview on the air because then they would have to do the
    same for other Democrats.

    For what it?s worth, Talarico is basically a straight Pete Buttigieg.
    That is his entire schtick, down to the Pastor Pete routine.

    If you can remember back that far, one of the most irritating facets of
    the ?Pete Buttigieg for President? campaign ? and what irritated me
    most ? is when he would suddenly turn into the world?s worst Sunday
    School teacher and cite the Bible to say completely non-Biblical
    things. He would try to explain that the Bible has nothing to say about
    issues ranging from same-sex marriage to abortion, and that it?s just a
    social justice document drafted by the Democratic National Committee.

    Now, Talarico is doing the same exact thing. He?s claiming that you?re
    a bad Christian if you believe that same-sex marriage is non-Biblical.

    For the record, same-sex marriage is non-Biblical. There are many books
    of the Bible that reference this, not least of which is Leviticus.

    Trying to do the Pastor Pete routine, Talarico declared:

    Jesus gave us two commandments: Love God and love neighbor.
    And there was no exception to that second commandment. Love
    thy neighbor, regardless of race or gender or sexual
    orientation or immigration status or religious affiliation.
    And it?s why I have fought so hard for the separation of
    church and state in the state capital in Texas.

    When Democrats try to reframe their own religiosity on the basis of
    ?Jesus was a post- religious figure who was in favor of secular
    humanism? ? I may not be a New Testament expert, but it seems to me
    that Jesus was, in his human form, a Jew growing up under Biblical law,
    and that Jesus as the creator of Christianity, proceeded to suggest
    that people ought to follow the precepts of Christianity rather
    exclusively.

    I think that?s a non-controversial take on the Bible.

    It?s amazing how far Democrats have moved in my lifetime. Democrats
    used to do this routine where they would say, Sure, the Bible says that abortion is bad, Christianity says abortion is bad. There is a long-
    standing, several thousand years old doctrine that abortion is not
    approved, that same-sex marriage is not approved, and that homosexual
    activity is a sin. These are long-standing religious traditions, but we
    have separation of church and state. In terms of public policy, I don?t believe in making public policy on the basis of Biblical law, because
    this is not a theocracy.

    That used to be the Democratic stance, which I think is weak when it
    comes to trying to make peace with Christians, but at least it is
    arguable. The new Democratic standards are that the Bible is somehow a document that greenlights same-sex marriage and encourages abortion,
    and if you truly were a Christian, you would be in favor of all these
    things.

    Talarico says, ?Love thy neighbor means love thy neighbor, regardless
    of immigration status or sexual orientation.?

    The Bible says you are supposed to love thy neighbor as thyself, but
    you are not supposed to love his sin. You?re not supposed to place a
    stumbling block in front of the blind. There?s the Biblical injunction,
    which is commonly presumed to mean that you are not supposed to allow
    your neighbor to go without redress. If he?s sinning, you?re supposed
    to warn him.

    So, back to CBS: What?s happening at CBS right now is an attempt to
    scuttle the ownership change at CBS and also target Bari Weiss at CBS
    News.

    It?s all about virtue signaling for the Democrats. It has nothing to do
    with reality.

    Democratic lawmakers, for their part, are suggesting they?re now going
    to investigate CBS. Representative Darren Soto of Florida wrote, ?FCC
    Chair Brendan Carr?s reign on unlawful censorship continues. This time
    he?s blocking Democratic candidates. @EnergyCommerce Dems will be investigating this outrage. A reckoning is coming.?

    FCC Chair Brendan Carr?s reign on unlawful censorship
    continues. This time he?s blocking Democratic
    candidates.@EnergyCommerce Dems will be investigating this
    outrage. A reckoning is coming? https://t.co/56MmbYdfIR

    ? Rep. Darren Soto (@RepDarrenSoto) February 17, 2026

    All of this shows you what Democrats are going to do with Congress if
    they happen to win in 2026, which is to shut everything down.

    --
    Democrats and the liberal media hate President Trump more than they
    love this country.


    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.11
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)