• Re: WHY Is Stephen Colbert Writing Lord Of The Rings?!

    From O. Sharp@3:633/10 to All on Tue Mar 31 16:38:39 2026
    A whole heap o' posts in what has been a very quiet newsgroup,
    among them this post by Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>:

    For some reason, Stephen Colbert has taken a break from tanking late
    night talk shows to trash Lord of the Rings instead, in one of the most
    [...]
    --
    Democrats and the liberal media hate President Trump more than they
    love this country.

    I've quoted your .sig because soooo many of the comments don't really
    address the proposed "movie" so much as appear to be anti-Colbert, anti-liberal screeds.

    I too think yet another movie to add to the franchise is probably a waste
    of time, and certainly doesn't help Professor Tolkien's legacy. But if
    a number of you are bashing the movie solely because someone involved has politics you don't agree with, maybe you're in the wrong newsgroup.

    I'd suggest alt.fan.ad-hominem.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    ohh@panix.com ...Hey! Is this the "cancel culture" I keep
    hearing about? :)

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.13
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@3:633/10 to All on Tue Mar 31 18:52:14 2026
    O. Sharp <ohh@panix.com> wrote:
    among them this post by Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>:

    For some reason, Stephen Colbert has taken a break from tanking late
    night talk shows to trash Lord of the Rings instead, in one of the most

    [...]

    --
    Democrats and the liberal media hate President Trump more than they
    love this country.

    I've quoted your .sig because soooo many of the comments don't really >address the proposed "movie" so much as appear to be anti-Colbert, >anti-liberal screeds.

    I too think yet another movie to add to the franchise is probably a waste
    of time, and certainly doesn't help Professor Tolkien's legacy. But if
    a number of you are bashing the movie solely because someone involved has >politics you don't agree with, maybe you're in the wrong newsgroup.

    I'd suggest alt.fan.ad-hominem.

    Whoosh

    Thanks ever so for making me defend Ubi. The implication is that he got
    the job due to Hollywood connections and promoting the right politics,
    not for having a successful record of adapting novels into movie
    screenplays. And no matter how much political shitposting he does, it
    doesn't prevent you from pay8ing for a movie ticket and seeing this in
    theater when it opens since you are determined to prove that politics
    won't make this unentertaining.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------- >ohh@panix.com ...Hey! Is this the "cancel culture" I keep
    hearing about? :)

    You may despise Ubi but at least he figured out how to use a .sig
    delimiter. Can you figure it out too?

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.13
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
  • From Paul S Person@3:633/10 to All on Wed Apr 1 08:26:21 2026
    On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 18:52:14 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
    <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    O. Sharp <ohh@panix.com> wrote:
    among them this post by Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>:

    For some reason, Stephen Colbert has taken a break from tanking late >>>night talk shows to trash Lord of the Rings instead, in one of the
    most

    [...]

    --
    Democrats and the liberal media hate President Trump more than they
    love this country.

    I've quoted your .sig because soooo many of the comments don't really >>address the proposed "movie" so much as appear to be anti-Colbert, >>anti-liberal screeds.

    I too think yet another movie to add to the franchise is probably a
    waste
    of time, and certainly doesn't help Professor Tolkien's legacy. But if
    a number of you are bashing the movie solely because someone involved
    has
    politics you don't agree with, maybe you're in the wrong newsgroup.

    I'd suggest alt.fan.ad-hominem.

    Whoosh

    Thanks ever so for making me defend Ubi. The implication is that he got
    the job due to Hollywood connections and promoting the right politics,
    not for having a successful record of adapting novels into movie
    screenplays. And no matter how much political shitposting he does, it
    doesn't prevent you from pay8ing for a movie ticket and seeing this in >theater when it opens since you are determined to prove that politics
    won't make this unentertaining.

    The idea that a /sig/ produces an implied meaning into a post is
    insane.

    It does, however, tell us something about the author.

    And what it says about the author is that he is incapable of
    separating political and non-political topics.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------- >>ohh@panix.com ...Hey! Is this the "cancel culture" I keep
    hearing about? :)

    You may despise Ubi but at least he figured out how to use a .sig
    delimiter. Can you figure it out too?

    This, however, is a valid criticism, under the circumstances.

    (I confirmed that Agent, at least, will nor recognize it as a sig and
    omit it from a response.)
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.13
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)