https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSC4qCwmce0
In the Colorado vehicle registration database, both "O" and "0" are used
on license plates.
A man was repeatedly pulled over by police in one jurisdiction based on >alerts from Flock, which attempts to perform a hit on every single
license plate it sees. The alert was an arrest warrant for a missed
court appearance in another county. The man in question is not the
subject of the arrest warrant.
The man subject to the warrant was first arrested by state police. When
he missed his court date, the sheriff input the license two ways, using
both "O" and "0".
The man called called the sheriff but couldn't get him to remove the
plate. He said he needed to know the other man's name, which of course
he didn't know. Then the sheriff blamed state police because it was a
state case, but state police explained that the court gives instruction
to the sheriff when the warrant is issued, not state police. Clearly the >sheriff is lying.
This guy is totally fucked.
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> writes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSC4qCwmce0
[snip]
In the Colorado vehicle registration database, both "O" and "0" are used
on license plates.
A man was repeatedly pulled over by police in one jurisdiction based on >>alerts from Flock, which attempts to perform a hit on every single
license plate it sees. The alert was an arrest warrant for a missed
court appearance in another county. The man in question is not the
subject of the arrest warrant.
The man subject to the warrant was first arrested by state police. When
he missed his court date, the sheriff input the license two ways, using >>both "O" and "0".
The man called called the sheriff but couldn't get him to remove the
plate. He said he needed to know the other man's name, which of course
he didn't know. Then the sheriff blamed state police because it was a
state case, but state police explained that the court gives instruction
to the sheriff when the warrant is issued, not state police. Clearly the >>sheriff is lying.
This guy is totally fucked.
While Flock and this whole concept is James Bond
villain level EVIL, the simple solution to this
(as opposed to the "right" solution) is to get
a new plate.
danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> wrote:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> writes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSC4qCwmce0
[snip]
In the Colorado vehicle registration database, both "O" and "0" are used >>> on license plates.
A man was repeatedly pulled over by police in one jurisdiction based on
alerts from Flock, which attempts to perform a hit on every single
license plate it sees. The alert was an arrest warrant for a missed
court appearance in another county. The man in question is not the
subject of the arrest warrant.
The man subject to the warrant was first arrested by state police. When
he missed his court date, the sheriff input the license two ways, using
both "O" and "0".
The man called called the sheriff but couldn't get him to remove the
plate. He said he needed to know the other man's name, which of course
he didn't know. Then the sheriff blamed state police because it was a
state case, but state police explained that the court gives instruction
to the sheriff when the warrant is issued, not state police. Clearly the >>> sheriff is lying.
This guy is totally fucked.
While Flock and this whole concept is James Bond
villain level EVIL, the simple solution to this
(as opposed to the "right" solution) is to get
a new plate.
Someone suggested getting a plate with a new number with every annual
vehicle registration, to disrupt long-term data collection of vehicle movements in commercial databases.
While Flock and this whole concept is James Bond
villain level EVIL, the simple solution to this
(as opposed to the "right" solution) is to get
a new plate.
On Sun, 24 May 2026 22:50:52 -0000 (UTC), danny burstein
<dannyb@panix.com> wrote:
While Flock and this whole concept is James Bond
villain level EVIL, the simple solution to this
(as opposed to the "right" solution) is to get
a new plate.
That happened in BC where a person's vanity plate was issued then 2 or
3 years later was deemed offensive and they required him to get a new
plate BUT comped him the cost of a new vanity plate.
Wish I could remember the plate but it was the guy's surname. "Fokker"
or something like that. (Which you'll recall was the name of a well
known German producer of fighter aircraft in both world wars)
But some random Karen on the road saw it and thought it was a racist reference >to forcing the Indians in Canadia to assimilate into white culture and >complained to the Canadidian version of the DMV, who revoked his tag for being >racially offensive. They told him it didn't matter that the reference was to >something wholly innocent, if it offends someone, it has to be revoked.
| Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
|---|---|
| Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
| Users: | 14 |
| Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
| Uptime: | 176:15:08 |
| Calls: | 218 |
| Files: | 21,503 |
| Messages: | 81,788 |