Would appreciate some feedback whether it be public or private by Friday, 17 March 2023, 20:00 UTC.
b) Want to encourage new innovation and help with their expertise, knowledge and history,
d) Represent an admirable fido citizen for their efforts,
This hobby is something that I think many want to keep alive, and many
want to progress it, while retaining the history that inspired them to
a) get back into it, or b) that they used to use back in the day.
I think there are realivately few new BBS nodes that werent nodes "back
in the day" (which IMHO is representative of a problem).
What is missing is a group of leaders that:
a) Want to inspire folks to use this technology,
b) Want to encourage new innovation and help with their expertise, knowledge and history,
c) Want to keep this hobby going,
d) Represent an admirable fido citizen for their efforts,
So I would suggest your cast your comment (and ultimately this regions vote) with that in mind, and determine if those users nominated will encourage that activity.
There really hasn't been anything new in a long time.... And the problem is so many systems are using older software, so they would be locked out of anything new.
People comming back or new people seam to get jumped on from a great height... They then go silent or shutup shop.
My only complaint with the FTSC is there should be an annual report of what has been done for the year even if it is little or nothing.
I appreciate that the FTSC function is only to document.
There are very few new Sysops for a number of reasons but the main one is younger people don't know what FTN is or have the inclination to use it. My sons are a classic example, they would prefer online gaming.
b) Want to encourage new innovation and help with their expertise,
knowledge and history,
There really hasn't been anything new in a long time.... And the problem is so many systems are using older software, so they would be locked out of anything new.
So I dont think much is done. My first tenure I dont recall anything
being done.
Not much to document, when nothing gets created right?
Yeah, I understand that. I've tried to get my son involved a little too
- and its not minecraft... :(
It's also interesting (and a bit unfortunate) almost every major
developer of FidoNet or BBS software at its peak left the scene only a
few years later, and more importantly never returned. Many of whom were incredibly talented and prolific coders.
[...]There really hasn't been anything new in a long time.... And the
problem is so many systems are using older software, so they would
be locked out of anything new.
Actually, this I dont agree with.
I created something new - not saying its great, nor do I want to boast
https://clrghouz.bbs.dege.au
And then there is Enimga written in javascript - it interacts with
binkp quite happily, the work that APAMs done, etc.
People comming back or new people seam to get jumped on from a
great height... They then go silent or shutup shop.
Yeah, this is the problem. Too many are shot down (I've seen a couple
in my short time back here).
b) Want to encourage new innovation and help with their
expertise, knowledge and history,
There really hasn't been anything new in a long time.... And the
problem is so many systems are using older software, so they
would be locked out of anything new.
This is really a FidoNet problem, or more widely a
BBSing-scene-in-general problem, not an FTSC problem.
Its scope is very limited compared to the imaginary power a handful of vocal people (especially in the past) seem to think it had.
For an even smaller number of folks a lot of the fun is to get a BBS
(or outside the BBS scene, a HTTP server) working on the oldest piece
of hardware they have, which is typically something from the 1980s or early '90s. I get that, though the fun can quickly wear off when the
old hardware finally dies and you can't easily get replacement parts!
I recall Ezycom and RemoteAccess were very popular but neither were
free.
At its peak FidoNet had around 40,000 nodes, so if we do an extremely rough calculation and assume each of those nodes had 100 regular
users, that's only 4 million people who ever used a FidoNet BBS, many
of whom would be oblivious or just disinterested in the Fido part of
it.
There was even a relatively successful Linux port of Maximus BBS made years ago. Oddly the guy who did 99% of the work disappeared from Fido
not long after he'd finished with it so I'm not even sure he used his
own creation "in anger".
It's also interesting (and a bit unfortunate) almost every major
developer of FidoNet or BBS software at its peak left the scene only a
few years later, and more importantly never returned. Many of whom
were incredibly talented and prolific coders.
Sysop: | Tetrazocine |
---|---|
Location: | Melbourne, VIC, Australia |
Users: | 7 |
Nodes: | 8 (0 / 8) |
Uptime: | 167:01:16 |
Calls: | 46 |
Files: | 21,492 |
Messages: | 65,689 |